2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

2.4 supercharger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2006 | 04:50 PM
  #26  
jaslowyota's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-18-06
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville fl
i wish someone could come out with an nice tune or stand alone because it seems like the lsj setup would fit so easily on our motors
Old 07-04-2006 | 07:57 AM
  #27  
JerseyJay's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 11-19-05
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, NJ
Originally Posted by jaslowyota
i wish someone could come out with an nice tune or stand alone because it seems like the lsj setup would fit so easily on our motors
the LSJ setup should fit directly to a 2.4 motor just as it fits directly to a 2.2. As stated, the key is tuning, but i believe HPT supports the 2.4 now. The good news? Your rods are made of the same material as the LSJ rods, so your bottom end should be good to well over 300 hp. With the more aggressive cams, higher compression, extra displacement, and vvt, the 2.4 should be able to come up with 300 whp on the same 2.7" pulley setup that the 2.0's only see 270 or so hp out of.

The only thing I'd really be worried about is since the 2.7 pulley is at the edge of the M62's efficiency, it will be pushing hot air, which will make tuning to avoid detonation more difficult. Using the SS/SC's aftercooler, and preferably a bigger heat exchanger and reservoir, will probably be a must.

Head porting and cams would probably bring even further gains.
Old 07-08-2006 | 01:24 AM
  #28  
JohnnySasakiMGS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-30-06
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 1
From: Upstate NY
I'm waiting for Hahn Racecraft to come out with the Turbo Kit. I saw a review for it in a mag. Said about 244 whp. The supercharger mentioned above only adds 60! But hahn isnt even done tweaking it yet.
Old 07-08-2006 | 06:26 PM
  #29  
JerseyJay's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 11-19-05
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, NJ
Originally Posted by JohnnySasakiMGS
I'm waiting for Hahn Racecraft to come out with the Turbo Kit. I saw a review for it in a mag. Said about 244 whp. The supercharger mentioned above only adds 60! But hahn isnt even done tweaking it yet.
RSM's charger doesn't add jack, because its a leaky piece of **** with a reflash thats total BS. If you like seeing 6-8 psi on a totally stock computer/fuel system, go with RSM by all means. They're a bunch of thieving snakes.
Old 07-10-2006 | 11:49 AM
  #30  
4drssmikekc's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 05-30-06
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: gardner kansas
Jerseyjay elaborate for us on that. How do you know this?
Old 07-10-2006 | 11:57 AM
  #31  
SSCobalt~SSZ24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-17-06
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
From: Columbus,Ohio
i have a gm supercharger on my z24 cavi
Old 08-27-2006 | 08:45 PM
  #32  
Loner05's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-24-06
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Dunn, NC
just thought i would revive this thread to see if there has been any progress with getting a s/c on the 2.4. and who has tunes to support this?
Old 08-27-2006 | 11:38 PM
  #33  
shortyheldberg's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-03-06
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach Ca.
Our vvt is kind of a problem. Not to get off the subject but my car mas been at K&N also at AEM and for alot longer than normal to get the intake to work properly, with the vvt, it just takes a bit more work to get it perfect. I know my car is at K&N as I speak and they needed it a few more days to get this out and to give us gains they would like to put out on the market
Old 08-28-2006 | 12:10 AM
  #34  
CobaltSonOfS.A.M.'s Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-25-06
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
All f/i applications can bennifit from a lower compression ratio, lower c/r = more boost, more boost= more power. Point blank!
Old 08-28-2006 | 12:21 AM
  #35  
avro206's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-17-04
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta Canada
Originally Posted by CobaltSonOfS.A.M.
All f/i applications can bennifit from a lower compression ratio, lower c/r = more boost, more boost= more power. Point blank!
I am not going to really argue that----but virtually every modern production F/I induction engine runs way more compression then they did in the past. Powerful computers and sensors to dected detonation and direct injection make this possible.

The high CR keeps the engine very responsive I beleive and helps combat the lag on a turbo
Old 08-28-2006 | 12:34 AM
  #36  
CobaltSonOfS.A.M.'s Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-25-06
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
yes it does, but with advances in turbo technology (ie the dual-scroll turbo in the Solstice GXP, and the veriable geometry turbo's in the 911 turbo) They can nearly eliminate turbo-lag, all higher comperssion really does is hinders our progress when we are trying to make our cars faster for the least amount of time and money. Changing pistons for some low compression ones isn't cheep labor.
Old 08-28-2006 | 02:11 AM
  #37  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
ummm... is it just me, or does that supercharger really look like a turbo?


centrifugal sc. Basically a turbo modified to run off the crank pulley.
Old 08-28-2006 | 02:12 AM
  #38  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
Originally Posted by avro206
I am not going to really argue that----but virtually every modern production F/I induction engine runs way more compression then they did in the past. Powerful computers and sensors to dected detonation and direct injection make this possible.

The high CR keeps the engine very responsive I beleive and helps combat the lag on a turbo

actually, more compression with the same boost will make more power. That's a fact. It is not as safe to run high compression, but im just letting you know for future reference more compression, more power. ALWAYS.
Old 08-28-2006 | 02:23 AM
  #39  
charged_sunfire's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 03-19-06
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: MD
mine as well post mine up even though its for the 2.4 TC, m45



fins!
Old 08-28-2006 | 02:39 AM
  #40  
CobaltSonOfS.A.M.'s Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-25-06
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro
actually, more compression with the same boost will make more power. That's a fact. It is not as safe to run high compression, but im just letting you know for future reference more compression, more power. ALWAYS.
Yes that is true, but say you have a hypothetical 4 cylender engine with 10:1 compression and it makes 155hp, you add f/i (doesn't mater what kind) say 8psi, and that nets you, oh 220hp, and you up the compression, to say 11.8:1 and keep boost the same, and that nets you say 270hp, but you have reached the limit of how much boost you can push. BUT if you lower compression to say 8.5:1 and Keep the same boost you get, oh 170hp, turn up the boost to say 20psi, and that nets you, oh 290psi, and you still haven't reached your boost limit. LOWER compression allows for more boost, n/a engines can only get so powerful off compression alone, but if you add boost to a high compression engine you can only push a very small amount of boost before you brake something, but thie lower you go with your c/r, the more boost you can push. Boost will ALWAYS get you more power than with high c/r, so to allow higher boost levels you HAVE to lower your compression, unless you like breaking things. Yes your engine will loose power if you lower your c/r, but you can more than make up for that loss in boost, like 3-4 times at least.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
05-28-2022 03:47 AM
RaginChopsuey
War Stories
16
10-27-2015 01:27 PM
brandon04
Problems/Service/Maintenance
46
10-21-2015 07:04 AM
patooyee
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
50
10-15-2015 05:11 PM
z28addiction
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
09-28-2015 12:03 AM



Quick Reply: 2.4 supercharger?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24 AM.