what are you guys getting? and how far off is it from a manual? like .5 secs? my car has 37,500 miles and i taped the speedo and tac and then timed it by reviewing the footage with a stop watch. i get a low 9... doesnt sound good, but i had my 200lbs and my g/fs 115lbs too, plus the mileage so idk... lets hear what some of u got

 

in my 2.2 ive had someone use a stop watch and its a upper 7 second range at the best

 

9 is waaaaaaaaay slow

 

no kidding, i did say that. ive done it by using a stop watch and have gotten between upper 7s and low 8s, but how do u know if it was tripped off at the right time? thats why i video taped it so i can do it more accuratley and i get anywhere from a 8.8 to 9.2 depending when i hit the button. gotta remember too it isnt a 10 mile off the show room car either plus an extra person in the vehicle plus my 9000ft elevation. i dont live by the bay like u smilin boy

 

It's not a racecar. 9 seconds is about right, unfortunately.

 

absolutley, and atleast im honest on what i got. i could have said 6.8 or something far off like that. there are too many factors and racing ecoboxes is a bit lame anyway.

 

Stopwatches and whatnot can easily be off a second or more.

 

9000ft in pa? wowzer

 

yep im by elk mountain

 

Damn 9000 ft elevation, that explains a lot haha. I live at a nice 5 feet above sea level according to the town sign. We are so gonna be under water in a few years

 

A stock 2.2 at sea level with normal running weight should be at 8.5 seconds.

 

i mean 900ft*

 

is that a GN in ur sig?

 

I think the OP has a 2.4... if so that's somewhat bad.

 

997 to be exact lol

monte carlo ss. its gone sadly

 

i coulda maybe pulled a high 5 low 6

 

i have no clue what my stock automatic 0-60 was. I'll let you know tomorrow what my 0-60 is w/ my turbo since I'm also getting it dyno'd tomorrow

 

ok, thats better
had me wondering for a minute
highest point in Summit county over here is 1320'..1/4mile..lol

 

i think C&D got the 2.4 auto at 7.5 sec and manual at 7.1 sec

i'll clock mine with my interceptor when i get the chance

 

yeah they always seem to get "super human" like times. they seem to have the lowest numbers of any magazine

 

That is one fine looking monte in your sig. I used to have a 79 Malibu Nuttin Runs like an A/G body Perfect combo of shitty handeling and if done right gobs of torque and HP

 

correct

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test

on anoter note--stip watch is a bad way to time your car---not precise at all.

and whoever posted 9 secs...that was funny!

 

the dyno didnt measure my 0-60 but it did measure my whp @ 242

 

hows that funny after u just stated how unscientific it was?

 

Unscientific? Like I said before he mean unacurate.