2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

Did I just buy a Terd?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2007 | 06:44 PM
  #26  
jeweler54's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-24-06
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: arkansas
50 shot N20 and your there
Old 05-24-2007 | 10:36 PM
  #27  
2.4SlowassBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-08-07
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, Florida
Originally Posted by SSBalt
Hey everyone. Virgin poster here. Just purchased a new SS 2.4 coupe 5 spd. Being shipped from another dealer so I have to wait for delivery..sigh.. There are no 5 spd's within distance to test drive so I settled for a run in a 4 door auto SS. To be honest it felt like accelerating in a Taurus SE. Granted the dealer had the A/C blowin which I didn't object to since my pits were already sweatin...but I was still a little dissapointed. Obviously I don't expect a 12 sec. car but do the 5 spd's have a noticeable zip factor over the autos stock? The grip was excellent by the way. To the auto guys. My track time experience has shown that a properly modded auto will CONSISTENTLY outrun a manual anyday (duh). So Im not flaming bashing or any of that crap. Just lookin for a ohh...im going 40 and a civic pulled up next to me.. and downshift...blam..feel that rush..yay i won. BTW heres my other cars in order.

95 Wrangler S 5spd (reliable but scary slow)
92 Mustang Gt 5 spd (heavy mods including Zex nitrous / Vortech S-trim)
98 Cavalier 5spd (good car just kinda boring)
92 Mustang lx 5.0 5 spd (medium bolt ons)
87 Mustang Gt 5 spd (minor bolt ons)
91 Camaro z28 Conv. auto (stock)
78 caprice classic auto (big red)
looks like a FORD was the car you did the most with so im glad to see you got a chevy

oh cars pretty cool though....

just the other night i was ridin down a main road in my town and pulled beside some truck/jeep and he got on it so naturally so did i, then i pulled on him got in front of him and we got caught at a red light and her said "what the **** you got in that thing, i got a v8 and you were pullin on me the whole time." so im guessin the car is decently quick for the car it is.
Old 05-24-2007 | 10:36 PM
  #28  
Saintcyanide's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 11-09-06
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by LewiSS
The Taurus SE has a good sized V6, so that's a compliment, actually. I drive a 4-door auto, and it's no dog, just a bit slower off the line than the 5-speed. Also, they probably had regular gas it it. Mine is noticeably more sluggish with regular, since the computer compensates for the lack of octane by backing off timing. Also, the auto feels much better if driven in the "I" position rather than "D".

Anyway, enjoy your 5-speed when it arrives. The FE3 suspension is a great compromise, the Cobalt is noticably quieter inside than much of the competition, and I love the steering feel in spite of all the mags bashing the electric power steering. If you evern want more handling, springs are like $225 and make a big difference, plus there are numerous sway bars available.
What does the "I" position do?
Old 05-25-2007 | 09:59 AM
  #29  
SSBalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-07
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Blandon, PA
Got my Cobalt yesterday. What a blast to drive! The owners manual says no no to going over 5k rpms -until 500 mile break in, but I let one slip. And wouldn't you know it..the lil monster took off. Now I know why I thought the sedan/auto was slow. I really didn't get on it hard enough (dealer being with me and all). Im so used to those torque v8's that I ignored the happy revving 4's rule of thumb. Hopefully my sportlines will be here by this weekend. I'll do the before and after pic thing for you guys.
Old 05-25-2007 | 12:15 PM
  #30  
avro206's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-17-04
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Alberta Canada
Originally Posted by SSBalt
Got my Cobalt yesterday. What a blast to drive! The owners manual says no no to going over 5k rpms -until 500 mile break in, but I let one slip. And wouldn't you know it..the lil monster took off. Now I know why I thought the sedan/auto was slow. I really didn't get on it hard enough (dealer being with me and all). Im so used to those torque v8's that I ignored the happy revving 4's rule of thumb. Hopefully my sportlines will be here by this weekend. I'll do the before and after pic thing for you guys.
congrats! I knew you'd like the 5 speed
Old 05-25-2007 | 12:59 PM
  #31  
WhiteSSBalt's Avatar
Not a Sebring
 
Joined: 02-22-07
Posts: 12,863
Likes: 2
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by LewiSS
The Taurus SE has a good sized V6, so that's a compliment, actually. I drive a 4-door auto, and it's no dog, just a bit slower off the line than the 5-speed. Also, they probably had regular gas it it. Mine is noticeably more sluggish with regular, since the computer compensates for the lack of octane by backing off timing. Also, the auto feels much better if driven in the "I" position rather than "D".

Anyway, enjoy your 5-speed when it arrives. The FE3 suspension is a great compromise, the Cobalt is noticably quieter inside than much of the competition, and I love the steering feel in spite of all the mags bashing the electric power steering. If you evern want more handling, springs are like $225 and make a big difference, plus there are numerous sway bars available.
Noticeable quieter? lol, boy are those days gone for my 'balt. Im lucky if I can even hear myself think when I drive my car.

On the contrary, a 5-speed coupe version of the 2.4SS is a tad bit quicker, as its slightly lighter, and as with any auto, you lose some extra poines through the transmission. But in any case, I would never call the 2.4SS a "turd", as its the 2nd fastest car under 20k as someone already pointed out.

and just for the record, Taurus's are horrible, ugly rental cars that Ford should have never brought back. The only way i'd ever drive a Taurus is if it was one of the ones used in Robo Cop. Then i'd roll around pulling people over and proceeding to act like a robot.
Old 05-25-2007 | 01:13 PM
  #32  
TheDriver!'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-30-05
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
This is the reply I was waiting for .. Ya you'll find its got power just a matter of finding it and def over 3000rpm.. It took me awhile to find that torque etc myself but once I did I found your impressed. REMEMBER people, these are sport compacts! Not sport cars etc etc.. How many of us are trying to run 12's and stuff when the majority of the time we drive like regular folks just trying to get to point A and then B. I don't know what this obsession is with running this many seconds?? Anyways SSBalt enjoy
Originally Posted by SSBalt
Got my Cobalt yesterday. What a blast to drive! The owners manual says no no to going over 5k rpms -until 500 mile break in, but I let one slip. And wouldn't you know it..the lil monster took off. Now I know why I thought the sedan/auto was slow. I really didn't get on it hard enough (dealer being with me and all). Im so used to those torque v8's that I ignored the happy revving 4's rule of thumb. Hopefully my sportlines will be here by this weekend. I'll do the before and after pic thing for you guys.
Old 05-25-2007 | 06:02 PM
  #33  
BlackBaltSSNA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-08-07
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, NC
Originally Posted by SSBalt
Got my Cobalt yesterday. What a blast to drive! The owners manual says no no to going over 5k rpms -until 500 mile break in, but I let one slip. And wouldn't you know it..the lil monster took off. Now I know why I thought the sedan/auto was slow. I really didn't get on it hard enough (dealer being with me and all). Im so used to those torque v8's that I ignored the happy revving 4's rule of thumb. Hopefully my sportlines will be here by this weekend. I'll do the before and after pic thing for you guys.
i told you so lol, well enjoy your new car!
Old 05-26-2007 | 12:26 AM
  #34  
rlinden86's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: Elyria/Ohio
well for insurance i pay for just by itself for my car starting a new plan would be 191 per month. its 2.4 manual coupe ss. but i have 2 cars so i get multi car discount so that goes down to 188permonth i also have 2 reckless opps in one year so thats gonna be over 200 lol.

ryan.
Old 05-26-2007 | 12:40 AM
  #35  
NJHK's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-05-06
Posts: 10,877
Likes: 2
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Is the terd "S-Shaped"?
Old 05-26-2007 | 01:01 AM
  #36  
LewiSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-17-06
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
From: Denver Metro
Originally Posted by Saintcyanide
What does the "I" position do?
It stands for "intense" and is a different shift program built right in. It will shift at higher RPM and shift harder (not higher at WOT, since it shifts at redline anyway, but at part throttle). It also doesn't go into overdrive (top gear). One thing I like about it here in the Colorado mountains is it will hold a gear like a manual as you get on and off the throttle on twisty roads, not shifting up until 4K, and then shifting back down almost like a manual at 2K. It never jumps into hi, and lets you compression brake as you back off for corners.
Old 05-26-2007 | 07:56 AM
  #37  
Jackalope's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-06
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 1
From: here
In-tents? I thought it was "improved"
Old 05-26-2007 | 08:12 AM
  #38  
Saintcyanide's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 11-09-06
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by LewiSS
It stands for "intense" and is a different shift program built right in. It will shift at higher RPM and shift harder (not higher at WOT, since it shifts at redline anyway, but at part throttle). It also doesn't go into overdrive (top gear). One thing I like about it here in the Colorado mountains is it will hold a gear like a manual as you get on and off the throttle on twisty roads, not shifting up until 4K, and then shifting back down almost like a manual at 2K. It never jumps into hi, and lets you compression brake as you back off for corners.
Ahh Ok. Thank you
Old 05-26-2007 | 10:41 PM
  #39  
panblackrose's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-11-06
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, Va
Hehe, well it depends... If you are a honda guy, then yeah, the cobalt is a joke and a turd. If you're a cobalt owner, then you know they eat hondas with little to no modification. Granted a tiny hatchback with a big motor swap will put you in your place, there are plenty of cars you can go head to head with. I took on an 07 Mustang GT, easily kill Tiburon GT V6's, and outrun TC's, most hondas, and even catch SS/SC's off the line, but of course once they hit 3rd, its over for me... Thats why Im looking into the rear mount STS turbosystem. They did it for the 2.2L with great success so i figured, why not.

As for being a turd. Some things need work, but overall, they are good cars based on a killer engine platform. Hope you are enjoying!
Old 05-27-2007 | 02:04 PM
  #40  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
Originally Posted by SSBOOST
Here's the deal. Stock 2.4SS dynoed whp at 150 for me. The magazines tell you its 173 but thats flywheel. For the supercharged they more or less took the whp dyno and put that in the specs instead of the flywheel. Most supercharged Cobalts are at about 200whp and that calculates to being at about 250 flywheel horsepower. I know this because my original intentions were buying the 2.4 SS and modding it to be as fast as a supercharged and I'm having a SUPER hard time. So far spent about $1000 including intake, catback, and tune and I went from about 150 to 165whp. To sum it up there is about a 70ish horsepower difference between the two.
well there is no doubt that the ss/sc's are under-rated, but they may not be as under-rated as people think. There is no 1:1 gear with the ss/sc, so on a dynojet, the results may be a bit skewed. In all likelihood, a PROPERLY CALIBRATED mustang dyno would show probably around 195ish whp. That still leaves the ss/sc at about 225chp, and vastly underrated, but i drove the ss/sc before i bought my car and it definately did not feel like it was making 225whp like some people are getting on the dynojets. I'd say 225-230chp is very realistic though...considering the weight of the car and the gearing, that would seem just about right for the times people are putting down.

for the topic starter, if you are looking for ss/sc performance in the cobalt, the cheapest way to do it is to just buy an ss/sc...a 2.4 won't do it without f/i, nitrous, or possibly head/cam work. If you are really tight for money and want this kind of performance in a four door though, i hate to say it, but look at the srt-4's...You can get used ones in great condition for under 15-16k

Originally Posted by panblackrose
Hehe, well it depends... If you are a honda guy, then yeah, the cobalt is a joke and a turd. If you're a cobalt owner, then you know they eat hondas with little to no modification. Granted a tiny hatchback with a big motor swap will put you in your place, there are plenty of cars you can go head to head with. I took on an 07 Mustang GT, easily kill Tiburon GT V6's, and outrun TC's, most hondas, and even catch SS/SC's off the line, but of course once they hit 3rd, its over for me... Thats why Im looking into the rear mount STS turbosystem. They did it for the 2.2L with great success so i figured, why not.

As for being a turd. Some things need work, but overall, they are good cars based on a killer engine platform. Hope you are enjoying!
wait so you took down a mid 13 second car in your mid-low 15 second car?

Last edited by 8cd03gro; 05-27-2007 at 02:06 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 05-28-2007 | 10:53 PM
  #41  
SilverSurfer's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-11-07
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: pa
I actually stands for "intermidiate" according to the manual.
Old 06-04-2007 | 07:38 PM
  #42  
SredS's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-31-07
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: IL
my 2.4L coupe Auto picks up just fine

plus the difference between reg grade and premium is a big difference

it even says in the manual that any lower grade than premium will cause your car to accelerate slower
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dennis69
Appearance
9
10-20-2015 04:49 PM
patooyee
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
50
10-15-2015 05:11 PM
OrangeCoba
Suspension
1
10-01-2015 10:00 PM
Iceberg
New Members Check In!!
8
09-29-2015 12:33 PM
Iceberg
Drivetrain
1
09-28-2015 01:31 PM



Quick Reply: Did I just buy a Terd?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 AM.