Forged rods and pistons for the 2.4l
#26
Originally Posted by mike25
well i was kiding about that level of boost..maybe 20's- to 30's possibly...and for NA you could prob get the highest compression pistons you could find and put them in there...with all the proper "alowances", you should see somewhat moderate gains from this...but i will say that the engines life will most likely be dramatically lowered
He won't find any already in production, he would have to get them custom made.
Compression would all be up to you basically. There is no right or wrong, it's all in what you think is what you need and then maintaining it from there.
#27
Originally Posted by savior
thanks mike, but i really wanna keep my car N.A - so whats the highest compression ratio for a Naturally Aspirated car? and what gains would i see?
Also, Wednesday I'm getting the flash done so if you want, anyday after that you can come down and I'll give you a ride in the turbo beast
#29
Originally Posted by NJHK
I retract my previous statement about 40+ PSI...even still 20-30 PSI is alot.
He won't find any already in production, he would have to get them custom made.
Compression would all be up to you basically. There is no right or wrong, it's all in what you think is what you need and then maintaining it from there.
He won't find any already in production, he would have to get them custom made.
Compression would all be up to you basically. There is no right or wrong, it's all in what you think is what you need and then maintaining it from there.
#31
Originally Posted by savior
would replacing the cams and pistons make my car sound grumbly... like... LS1 grumbly?
#32
cute because i love the noise of the LS1
for my car (which will remain N.A) i am gonna make it breath better (i.e intake, header, exhaust) - also add a ECM tune and some new cams/piston heads
by then ill be satisfied with my car- regardless of my boostless 2.4
for my car (which will remain N.A) i am gonna make it breath better (i.e intake, header, exhaust) - also add a ECM tune and some new cams/piston heads
by then ill be satisfied with my car- regardless of my boostless 2.4
#33
Originally Posted by mike25
yea after i posted that...i started thinking about the boost levels(20-30) and pretty much decided that would most likely still be to high...if not too high it would pretty much be a time bomb waiting to go off and a whole world of mechanical problems...ye i was j/k bout the 45-50..lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post