G.M. tech says Sc for 2.4
#29
Originally Posted by Cobalt_Supercharged
HP Tuner software allows you to adjust the timing aswell as fuel maps. This would be your best bet I think.
#31
Originally Posted by snobird
so when and how can we get the sc for the 2.4 and i fgiuriging it will be warranty
#34
Originally Posted by snobird
hmm i really cant wait till sc comes out 7 psi will be fine gm if your listening i am wating
#35
Originally Posted by NJHK
Unless GM makes a kit for the 2.4, it won't be warrantied. GM will warranty their work, say if you give them a supercharger and tell them to put it on but they won't warranty the actual parts or your motor if it blows.
or is it the fact that you can have warranty work done and not have to worry about them bitching about your supercharger?
#36
Originally Posted by IonNinja
whats so special about that though? don't all companies have some type of warranty on their parts?
or is it the fact that you can have warranty work done and not have to worry about them bitching about your supercharger?
or is it the fact that you can have warranty work done and not have to worry about them bitching about your supercharger?
#37
Originally Posted by IonNinja
whats so special about that though? don't all companies have some type of warranty on their parts?
or is it the fact that you can have warranty work done and not have to worry about them bitching about your supercharger?
or is it the fact that you can have warranty work done and not have to worry about them bitching about your supercharger?
A company like hahn waranties individual parts...their manifold has a certain warranty, their turbo has a certain warranty. Now if you piece your own kit, same thing MIGHT apply. I have a friend who bought a Garrett turbo and didn't install it for months later...1200 miles on it and it went bad...had a warranty but it was only 30 days. Just stuff like that you gotta look out for.
#38
check this scenario..with a supercharger runnin say 8 psi of boost on stock internals...say you went and bought forged internals or just some type of internals that would handle a **** load more power...once you install those..couldnt you crank up the boost level a bit...also if you did this wouldnt it definately be cable of making more poewr than a 2.0...that would most likely make the 2.4 a more powerful engine..just not as reliable..wouldnt it?
#39
Originally Posted by mike25
check this scenario..with a supercharger runnin say 8 psi of boost on stock internals...say you went and bought forged internals or just some type of internals that would handle a **** load more power...once you install those..couldnt you crank up the boost level a bit...also if you did this wouldnt it definately be cable of making more poewr than a 2.0...that would most likely make the 2.4 a more powerful engine..just not as reliable..wouldnt it?
#40
Originally Posted by mike25
check this scenario..with a supercharger runnin say 8 psi of boost on stock internals...say you went and bought forged internals or just some type of internals that would handle a **** load more power...once you install those..couldnt you crank up the boost level a bit...also if you did this wouldnt it definately be cable of making more poewr than a 2.0...that would most likely make the 2.4 a more powerful engine..just not as reliable..wouldnt it?
#41
sorry to hijack the thread, but will GM be producing a S/C for the 2.2L? With all this talk of one for the 2.4L, i'm hoping one will be produced for the 2.2 as well. The reason I'm not going with an aftermarket brand is because of the warranty. I know I can probably get more power out of an aftermarket, but if GM produces one i'm sure i'll be able to make enough power to make me happy and keep my warranty!
#42
Originally Posted by NJHK
If you have pistons that are lower in compression and are of high quality forge, than yes, you could turn it up ALOT actually. Wiseco pistons are rated around 500 HP. It all depends on tuning though...can't just crank up the boost.
#43
Originally Posted by dead_black_balt667
sorry to hijack the thread, but will GM be producing a S/C for the 2.2L? With all this talk of one for the 2.4L, i'm hoping one will be produced for the 2.2 as well. The reason I'm not going with an aftermarket brand is because of the warranty. I know I can probably get more power out of an aftermarket, but if GM produces one i'm sure i'll be able to make enough power to make me happy and keep my warranty!
#45
Originally Posted by Woody
I don't have any inside info, but I tend to agree with Brandon. I can not recall GM doing a turbo on any production car. Maybe they have, but I can not think of any. But supercharged - yup. Did supercharged in the past, and obviously doing it now.
- w
- w
I do not see GM ever offering any type of forced induction for the 2.2 or 2.4 Ecotecs. The tranny is only rated to take slightly more than stock power and GM can't sell you something and then deny warranty for using it.
#46
Originally Posted by 06G5GT
Sunbird GT had a turbo until 1991 model year.
I do not see GM ever offering any type of forced induction for the 2.2 or 2.4 Ecotecs. The tranny is only rated to take slightly more than stock power and GM can't sell you something and then deny warranty for using it.
I do not see GM ever offering any type of forced induction for the 2.2 or 2.4 Ecotecs. The tranny is only rated to take slightly more than stock power and GM can't sell you something and then deny warranty for using it.
I don't know where people are getting this "the transmissions are weak" thing from.
#47
Originally Posted by dnbguy86
If anything, it will make more power due to its compression ratio, granted it will have to run a higher octane fuel. And as far as the getrag being maxed out, nonsense,i've personally seen getrag's handle 250whp with nothing more but a slight clutch upgrade. The reason the ss/sc runs more boost is because its compression ratio is lower than that of the 2.2/2.4, so it must run more boost to compensate for the lack of compression. The final drive ratio really doesn't have so much an affect on who'd, but more of the ratio's of all the gears in the tranny. Not trying to butt heads or anything, just trying to show its capable of beating an ss/sc not saying it would though.
GM lowered the compression on the 2.0L to reduce engine stress. Running a higher compression ratio on forced induction engines would increase the chanches of engine failure due to components being overstressed. Compression ratio does not affect how much boost your supercharger throws. The higher the compression ration, the more mechanical energy your engine can produce from the air/fuel mixture! It is the ratio of the volume of the cylinder at the bottom of a stroke in relation to the volume of air at the top of its stroke( i.e. a 10:1 ration compresses the air in the cylinder by 10X during a stroke). Boost is how much air you are adding to your air/fuel mixture by way of forced induction. A 2.0L engine with a 10:1 compression would make more power than a 2.0L engine running a 9:1 compression ratio if both were boosted with 10 Psi! Compression ration would make more power, not more boost!
That is exactly why the 2.4L won't make more power than the 2.0L supercharged. There is no way they can pump as much as 12.5 Psi into that engine and still offer a warranty. Also, it has no intercooler, so it will be recieving a hotter air mix as compared to the LSJ! At most I would expect GM to not offer more than 6 Psi. That combined with no intercooler (or aftercooler to be more precise) will not yield as much of a power gain as you expect! A 2.4L running 12.5 Psi of boost won't last very long compared to a 2.0L running 12.5 Psi of boost. Gm will not sell a supercharger kit that destroys 2.4L engines.
And how long has that getrag lasted for running 250 whp??? Just because it takes it for a few thousand miles doesn't mean it is going to last 20,000 miles! A clutch doesn't relieve stress on the transmission either! The transmission still has the same amount of power going through it whether it runs a carbon-ceramic clutch plate or a bannana-peel!
#48
Originally Posted by IonNinja
Actually the higher compression would probably be of more benefit than not. Since it takes power to make power a stronger NA engine would help with supercharger gains. Not to mention a larger displacement engine means it will be taking in more air than a 2.0 would, which means more power.
The only problem the 10.4 compression generates is the worry of detonation but you wouldn't necessarily need to run 14lbs of boost if you were at 10.4 compression and a 2.4 liter engine.
I'm not sure where you get your info from but I'm willing to bet that any of the other boosted Ecotec engines will outperform the LSJ in terms of speed. The only advantage to the LSJ is that it can run a higher amount of psi.
The only problem the 10.4 compression generates is the worry of detonation but you wouldn't necessarily need to run 14lbs of boost if you were at 10.4 compression and a 2.4 liter engine.
I'm not sure where you get your info from but I'm willing to bet that any of the other boosted Ecotec engines will outperform the LSJ in terms of speed. The only advantage to the LSJ is that it can run a higher amount of psi.
I totally agree that a 2.4L running the same boost as us would make way more power (maybe 220-230 HP). GM will not offer 12.5 Psi of boost, nor will it have our aftercooler. As a result, power will not be much more, if any higher than an SS/SC! Read what I said!
Also, why would GM sell a supercharger kit that would make it cheaper to buy a 2.4L and add on the supercharger and result in a faster car than the more expensive SS/SC???? That would hurt SS/SC sales! That would be like GM offering the LS7 as a $5,000 crate motor, so you could build your garden variety Corvette into a Z06 for $10,000 less than buying a Z06! It is not going to happen.
And if I am wrong about any of this, than I will eat my words! GM is in financial sh#t right now. The last thing they need is to market an unreliable upgrade that is going to cost them lots of money!
The advantage to the LSJ is that unlike the 2.2L or 2.4L, it can reliably run 10-20 Psi of boost with no concerns of failure! That is why they lowered the compression ratio!
#49
Originally Posted by mi6_
No. You don't understand what compression ratio is!
GM lowered the compression on the 2.0L to reduce engine stress. Running a higher compression ratio on forced induction engines would increase the chanches of engine failure due to components being overstressed. Compression ratio does not affect how much boost your supercharger throws. The higher the compression ration, the more mechanical energy your engine can produce from the air/fuel mixture! It is the ratio of the volume of the cylinder at the bottom of a stroke in relation to the volume of air at the top of its stroke( i.e. a 10:1 ration compresses the air in the cylinder by 10X during a stroke). Boost is how much air you are adding to your air/fuel mixture by way of forced induction. A 2.0L engine with a 10:1 compression would make more power than a 2.0L engine running a 9:1 compression ratio if both were boosted with 10 Psi! Compression ration would make more power, not more boost!
That is exactly why the 2.4L won't make more power than the 2.0L supercharged. There is no way they can pump as much as 12.5 Psi into that engine and still offer a warranty. Also, it has no intercooler, so it will be recieving a hotter air mix as compared to the LSJ! At most I would expect GM to not offer more than 6 Psi. That combined with no intercooler (or aftercooler to be more precise) will not yield as much of a power gain as you expect! A 2.4L running 12.5 Psi of boost won't last very long compared to a 2.0L running 12.5 Psi of boost. Gm will not sell a supercharger kit that destroys 2.4L engines.
And how long has that getrag lasted for running 250 whp??? Just because it takes it for a few thousand miles doesn't mean it is going to last 20,000 miles! A clutch doesn't relieve stress on the transmission either! The transmission still has the same amount of power going through it whether it runs a carbon-ceramic clutch plate or a bannana-peel!
GM lowered the compression on the 2.0L to reduce engine stress. Running a higher compression ratio on forced induction engines would increase the chanches of engine failure due to components being overstressed. Compression ratio does not affect how much boost your supercharger throws. The higher the compression ration, the more mechanical energy your engine can produce from the air/fuel mixture! It is the ratio of the volume of the cylinder at the bottom of a stroke in relation to the volume of air at the top of its stroke( i.e. a 10:1 ration compresses the air in the cylinder by 10X during a stroke). Boost is how much air you are adding to your air/fuel mixture by way of forced induction. A 2.0L engine with a 10:1 compression would make more power than a 2.0L engine running a 9:1 compression ratio if both were boosted with 10 Psi! Compression ration would make more power, not more boost!
That is exactly why the 2.4L won't make more power than the 2.0L supercharged. There is no way they can pump as much as 12.5 Psi into that engine and still offer a warranty. Also, it has no intercooler, so it will be recieving a hotter air mix as compared to the LSJ! At most I would expect GM to not offer more than 6 Psi. That combined with no intercooler (or aftercooler to be more precise) will not yield as much of a power gain as you expect! A 2.4L running 12.5 Psi of boost won't last very long compared to a 2.0L running 12.5 Psi of boost. Gm will not sell a supercharger kit that destroys 2.4L engines.
And how long has that getrag lasted for running 250 whp??? Just because it takes it for a few thousand miles doesn't mean it is going to last 20,000 miles! A clutch doesn't relieve stress on the transmission either! The transmission still has the same amount of power going through it whether it runs a carbon-ceramic clutch plate or a bannana-peel!
I could never get a straight answer about the transmission issue but what is so different between the transmissions in the 2.4 and the 2.0?
#50
Originally Posted by mi6_
Yeah exactly. So is GM going to offer 12.5 lbs of boost on an engine with a 10.4:1 compression ratio???? No, because they will have to buy new engines for half of the people who buy the kit within a year!
I totally agree that a 2.4L running the same boost as us would make way more power (maybe 220-230 HP). GM will not offer 12.5 Psi of boost, nor will it have our aftercooler. As a result, power will not be much more, if any higher than an SS/SC! Read what I said!
Also, why would GM sell a supercharger kit that would make it cheaper to buy a 2.4L and add on the supercharger and result in a faster car than the more expensive SS/SC???? That would hurt SS/SC sales! That would be like GM offering the LS7 as a $5,000 crate motor, so you could build your garden variety Corvette into a Z06 for $10,000 less than buying a Z06! It is not going to happen.
And if I am wrong about any of this, than I will eat my words! GM is in financial sh#t right now. The last thing they need is to market an unreliable upgrade that is going to cost them lots of money!
The advantage to the LSJ is that unlike the 2.2L or 2.4L, it can reliably run 10-20 Psi of boost with no concerns of failure! That is why they lowered the compression ratio!
I totally agree that a 2.4L running the same boost as us would make way more power (maybe 220-230 HP). GM will not offer 12.5 Psi of boost, nor will it have our aftercooler. As a result, power will not be much more, if any higher than an SS/SC! Read what I said!
Also, why would GM sell a supercharger kit that would make it cheaper to buy a 2.4L and add on the supercharger and result in a faster car than the more expensive SS/SC???? That would hurt SS/SC sales! That would be like GM offering the LS7 as a $5,000 crate motor, so you could build your garden variety Corvette into a Z06 for $10,000 less than buying a Z06! It is not going to happen.
And if I am wrong about any of this, than I will eat my words! GM is in financial sh#t right now. The last thing they need is to market an unreliable upgrade that is going to cost them lots of money!
The advantage to the LSJ is that unlike the 2.2L or 2.4L, it can reliably run 10-20 Psi of boost with no concerns of failure! That is why they lowered the compression ratio!
Of course this is talking about a totally different platform but I would say that they are still somewhat in competition as far as power wise if you're just all about going straight-line fast and not accessories and turning ability. Cobalt wise, I doubt they would ever do anything like that. Their answer to a s/c kit for the 2.2 or 2.4 would be "buy an SS/SC".