2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

gmmp exhuast

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2008 | 01:11 AM
  #1  
_UnLiMiTeD_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-15-08
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
From: Maple Ridge, B.C Canada
gmpp exhuast

i was just curious, for those of you who bought the gmmp catback, why didnt you just get the muffler?

it uses the same size piping as the cobalt has stock anyways, so wouldnt just getting a muffler show the same results? Wondering if there is any other major difference, getting an exhuast in the spring

nobody..

Last edited by _UnLiMiTeD_; 08-28-2008 at 01:11 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 08-28-2008 | 01:17 AM
  #2  
ssbalt06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-09-07
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
dude go vibrant.... i did and fell in love. end of story...since i couldnt get the ark lol
Old 08-28-2008 | 01:19 AM
  #3  
_UnLiMiTeD_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-15-08
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
From: Maple Ridge, B.C Canada
Originally Posted by ssbalt06
dude go vibrant.... i did and fell in love. end of story...since i couldnt get the ark lol
one at a time, im just curious as to why people buy the catback for this particular exhuast when it uses the same size piping. I was under my car a few weeks back and its not like the factory stuff is crush bent crap piping.
Old 08-28-2008 | 01:21 AM
  #4  
deuce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-21-07
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: WestCO STL
i got mine for xmas, hehe
Old 08-28-2008 | 01:25 AM
  #5  
EceSSiveMod's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-07-07
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 0
From: akron, ohio
the gmpp kit downsizes to 2.25in. correct me if im wrong...
Old 08-28-2008 | 01:34 AM
  #6  
_UnLiMiTeD_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-15-08
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
From: Maple Ridge, B.C Canada
we have 2.5 then one portion is 2.25.
Old 08-28-2008 | 01:41 AM
  #7  
EceSSiveMod's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-07-07
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 0
From: akron, ohio
thats retarded...catbacks are pointless anyways all you pay for is the name. You can get a muffler and replace the part of the exhaust that goes down to 2.25 begining at the rear tire with 2.5 for less than half the price of a 600 dolar catback
Old 08-28-2008 | 01:48 AM
  #8  
_UnLiMiTeD_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-15-08
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
From: Maple Ridge, B.C Canada
yup lol
Old 08-28-2008 | 01:50 AM
  #9  
EceSSiveMod's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-07-07
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 0
From: akron, ohio
ive been trying to preach this to everyone haha
Old 08-28-2008 | 03:26 AM
  #10  
Projekt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 24,280
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
well here is the thing

cat-backs are generally engineered (SP) and tuned accordingly to how a company wants their product to sound

putting a muffler, some pipe and a resenator together will not always give you the wanted sound

yes, a custom muffler+resenator combo is cheaper, and yes, gives you the same performance resaults, but the problem is the factor that you have no idea what sound your getting.

heres a easy way to look at it

Aftermarket Cat-back:
Pros:
Sound Tuned
Cons: Costs more money

Custom Cat-back
Pros:
Cheap
Cons:
Not Tuned Sound, Unknown resaults.

thats pretty much it in a nutshell for anyone wondering.
Old 08-28-2008 | 09:07 AM
  #11  
joeyblaze's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-15-06
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jerz
People need to relise its just not about the size of the pipe when dealing with exhuast, there this lil thing called flow. The the GMPP cat backs flow much better then the stock exhuast. they have high flowing mufs and mendal bent pipes. they sounds great also
Old 08-28-2008 | 04:53 PM
  #12  
PenguinPIE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 02-02-05
Posts: 4,147
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
i thought someone got it dynoed with the gmpp exhaust and got 1whp gain for the 2.4 because of the smaller piping

i know the 2.0L can get 12whp gain but thats because its F/I.

does anyone else have dyno for 2.4?
Old 08-29-2008 | 07:22 AM
  #13  
brickerenator's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-08-08
Posts: 7,576
Likes: 0
From: Thurmont, MD
read the thread "gmpp and mods" (i know there's a million) for claimed dyno gains
Guy said with that and intake he got 12-14 whp
Old 08-29-2008 | 08:48 AM
  #14  
nutsandboldts05's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-15-08
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
From: Cuba, New York
Originally Posted by joeyblaze
...relise...exhuast.....mendal

Realize Exhaust Mandrel

Originally Posted by Projekt
Not Tuned Sound, Unknown resaults.
Results


But I agree with Joey here, the GMPP cat-back is mandrel bent where the stock exhaust isn't = better flow.
Old 08-29-2008 | 08:50 AM
  #15  
SuperchargedSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-07-05
Posts: 3,533
Likes: 0
From: Canada
GMPP is cheap, and you get what you pay for. My buddies is rusting pretty bad
Old 08-29-2008 | 10:47 AM
  #16  
joeyblaze's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-15-06
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jerz
Originally Posted by nutsandboldts05
Realize Exhaust Mandrel



Results


But I agree with Joey here, the GMPP cat-back is mandrel bent where the stock exhaust isn't = better flow.

wow lol spelling>me ................lmao
Old 08-29-2008 | 10:56 AM
  #17  
Mss26's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 02-17-08
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
From: Stuttgart
**** **** ****

It's about FLOW god damnit. Not piping size.

The GMPP mandrel bent piping flows better than the stock piping.

CRUSH bent...
See how it narrows? Screws up flow...

Mandrel Bent. SMOOTH LIKE MY ASS

Last edited by Mss26; 08-29-2008 at 10:56 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 08-29-2008 | 11:53 AM
  #18  
joeyblaze's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-15-06
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jerz
Originally Posted by Mss26
**** **** ****

It's about FLOW god damnit. Not piping size.

The GMPP mandrel bent piping flows better than the stock piping.

CRUSH bent...
See how it narrows? Screws up flow...

Mandrel Bent. SMOOTH LIKE MY ASS
x2..
Old 08-29-2008 | 02:39 PM
  #19  
nutsandboldts05's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-15-08
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
From: Cuba, New York
Originally Posted by joeyblaze
wow lol spelling>me ................lmao
My bad bro... was just pointing out a few

Originally Posted by Mss26
**** **** ****

It's about FLOW god damnit. Not piping size.

The GMPP mandrel bent piping flows better than the stock piping.

CRUSH bent...
See how it narrows? Screws up flow...

Mandrel Bent. SMOOTH LIKE MY ASS
LMAO, I love your post.
Old 08-29-2008 | 02:48 PM
  #20  
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-08-06
Posts: 15,732
Likes: 410
From: Fort Worth, TX
GMPP flows 10x better than the stock piping. And it sounds a hell of a lot better than just chopping off the muffler and welding up a new muffler.

And the GMPP cat-back is made by Borla...
Old 08-29-2008 | 06:22 PM
  #21  
Le5speed's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-01-08
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: ohio
Originally Posted by Mss26
**** **** ****

It's about FLOW god damnit. Not piping size.

The GMPP mandrel bent piping flows better than the stock piping.

CRUSH bent...
See how it narrows? Screws up flow...

Mandrel Bent. SMOOTH LIKE MY ASS
im not much into the noise of a fourbanger so will simply replacing the piping with mandrel bent stainless do.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmelton327
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
13
09-25-2015 09:44 AM
Jroy326
Problems/Service/Maintenance
4
09-01-2015 07:37 PM
Switt23
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
5
02-13-2007 12:21 AM
bhowman1980
Parts
1
08-12-2006 12:42 PM
juststickit124
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
30
08-03-2006 12:33 AM



Quick Reply: gmmp exhuast



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:24 AM.