Good News 2.4l!!!!
#26
ryan.
#28
yeah thats pretty good for a mustang dyno. yeah i had a dynojet run 3 times its on myspace but thats not a baseline run. thats with all bolt ons but my afrs where screwy i got them fixed and should be alittle higher.
ryan.
ryan.
#29
#30
yes this was done on a dyno jet so i dont know what numbers he would make on a mustang ....will know for sure next friday
#31
why does everyone automatically assume a dynojet always reads higher than a mustang dyno? if the md is properly calibrated it should read very close to the dynojet. MD's can read higher, lower, or the same as dj's, so please nobody start the "subtract/add 10%!" bull ****. These are some nice numbers and i would be very happy with them, but if you get the dyno sheet post it up...id be weary of his a/f ratio. i beleive it, but like everyone else would be interested to see numbers from a different dyno, just because 15whp doesn't come from "dual e-rams" im sorry it just doesn't and everyone else with these kinda mods are makin 15-20whp less...maybe it's a real aggressive/good tune though, so who knows, congrats to your friend.
#32
why does everyone automatically assume a dynojet always reads higher than a mustang dyno? if the md is properly calibrated it should read very close to the dynojet. MD's can read higher, lower, or the same as dj's, so please nobody start the "subtract/add 10%!" bull ****. These are some nice numbers and i would be very happy with them, but if you get the dyno sheet post it up...id be weary of his a/f ratio. i beleive it, but like everyone else would be interested to see numbers from a different dyno, just because 15whp doesn't come from "dual e-rams" im sorry it just doesn't and everyone else with these kinda mods are makin 15-20whp less...maybe it's a real aggressive/good tune though, so who knows, congrats to your friend.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post