2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

Good News 2.4l!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2007 | 11:31 PM
  #26  
rlinden86's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: Elyria/Ohio
Originally Posted by HackAbuse
171 hp is what is stock at the crank, add drivetrain loss and you get about 160-155whp stock, i dont see where he's getting the extra 35-40hp from
actually stock 5spd 2.4 is about 140 145whp. with full exhaust intake and injector swap im pushin 173whp. and just under 200 crank hp

ryan.
Old 06-09-2007 | 11:34 PM
  #27  
REDFOCZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-22-06
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Yep I put down 146 HP stock on a mustang dyno. So if he was on a dynojet 200 should not be to hard to reach with full bolt on's.

My dyno is in my garage.
Old 06-09-2007 | 11:37 PM
  #28  
rlinden86's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: Elyria/Ohio
yeah thats pretty good for a mustang dyno. yeah i had a dynojet run 3 times its on myspace but thats not a baseline run. thats with all bolt ons but my afrs where screwy i got them fixed and should be alittle higher.

ryan.
Old 06-09-2007 | 11:49 PM
  #29  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,911
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
Originally Posted by thekingsSS
Id rather hear the whine of a procharger...... but thats just me
+1 to this... man i can't wait for it ....

so he's not exactly "n/a" anymore... but seriously... take out the erams and he's still at 190 or so... thats still awesome...
Old 06-10-2007 | 12:29 AM
  #30  
Cloudio's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 11-12-06
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Nevada
Originally Posted by REDFOCZ
Yep I put down 146 HP stock on a mustang dyno. So if he was on a dynojet 200 should not be to hard to reach with full bolt on's.

My dyno is in my garage.
yes this was done on a dyno jet so i dont know what numbers he would make on a mustang ....will know for sure next friday
Old 06-10-2007 | 03:23 PM
  #31  
8cd03gro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-09-06
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: .
Originally Posted by Cloudio
yes this was done on a dyno jet so i dont know what numbers he would make on a mustang ....will know for sure next friday

why does everyone automatically assume a dynojet always reads higher than a mustang dyno? if the md is properly calibrated it should read very close to the dynojet. MD's can read higher, lower, or the same as dj's, so please nobody start the "subtract/add 10%!" bull ****. These are some nice numbers and i would be very happy with them, but if you get the dyno sheet post it up...id be weary of his a/f ratio. i beleive it, but like everyone else would be interested to see numbers from a different dyno, just because 15whp doesn't come from "dual e-rams" im sorry it just doesn't and everyone else with these kinda mods are makin 15-20whp less...maybe it's a real aggressive/good tune though, so who knows, congrats to your friend.
Old 06-10-2007 | 07:25 PM
  #32  
Cloudio's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 11-12-06
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Nevada
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro
why does everyone automatically assume a dynojet always reads higher than a mustang dyno? if the md is properly calibrated it should read very close to the dynojet. MD's can read higher, lower, or the same as dj's, so please nobody start the "subtract/add 10%!" bull ****. These are some nice numbers and i would be very happy with them, but if you get the dyno sheet post it up...id be weary of his a/f ratio. i beleive it, but like everyone else would be interested to see numbers from a different dyno, just because 15whp doesn't come from "dual e-rams" im sorry it just doesn't and everyone else with these kinda mods are makin 15-20whp less...maybe it's a real aggressive/good tune though, so who knows, congrats to your friend.
Ya no i understand Iam curious myself lol Ill see what i can do
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hacadacalopolis
Parts
8
10-28-2015 06:09 PM
patooyee
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
50
10-15-2015 05:11 PM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
09-26-2015 06:44 PM
jas09ss
Drivetrain
2
09-26-2015 01:06 PM



Quick Reply: Good News 2.4l!!!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:39 AM.