Hahn Racecraft Cobalt SS 2.4 Turbo Prototype!
#176
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
We don't have solid 1/4 mile results yet on Cobalt, but as comparison...
Our Cavalier/Sunfire systems, when operated at similar power levels as this Stage II 2.4 kit, have resulted in mid-to-high 12's.
Our Solstice 2.4 car has gone 12.77 on street radials using a stock 2.4.
Our Sunfire 2.2, at Stage V power (but same turbosystem configuration as what we have here), with slicks and piston/rod upgrades has run low 11's @ 125 MPH.
Our Cavalier/Sunfire systems, when operated at similar power levels as this Stage II 2.4 kit, have resulted in mid-to-high 12's.
Our Solstice 2.4 car has gone 12.77 on street radials using a stock 2.4.
Our Sunfire 2.2, at Stage V power (but same turbosystem configuration as what we have here), with slicks and piston/rod upgrades has run low 11's @ 125 MPH.
Bill this was on the 20g right that you offer with your kit? I don't know the cost of the turbo (20g) but this new turbo, the RR500 from Helix, seems to kick the crap out of the 20g on the mid range, spool just as fast and offer almost "green" like top end.
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=1066413
Also is a ton cheaper than a comparable 20g. May be something to include in your kit to keep costs down. I have been following this from my subaru days.
Also what are you using for boost controller? It this part of the overall kit price as well?
Thanks Bill...we wait anxiously for the final product.
#178
Originally Posted by GTP
Bill this was on the 20g right that you offer with your kit? I don't know the cost of the turbo (20g) but this new turbo, the RR500 from Helix, seems to kick the crap out of the 20g on the mid range, spool just as fast and offer almost "green" like top end.
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=1066413
Also is a ton cheaper than a comparable 20g. May be something to include in your kit to keep costs down. I have been following this from my subaru days.
Also what are you using for boost controller? It this part of the overall kit price as well?
Thanks Bill...we wait anxiously for the final product.
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=1066413
Also is a ton cheaper than a comparable 20g. May be something to include in your kit to keep costs down. I have been following this from my subaru days.
Also what are you using for boost controller? It this part of the overall kit price as well?
Thanks Bill...we wait anxiously for the final product.
No boost controller needed...the turbocharger makes the boost pressure we designate.
Last edited by Hahn RaceCraft; 08-18-2006 at 02:36 PM.
#179
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
Yes, all these performances were with 20G. Thanks for the input. We love these units!
No boost controller needed...the turbocharger makes the boost pressure we designate.
No boost controller needed...the turbocharger makes the boost pressure we designate.
Thanks Bill. Are you guys using the stock 2.4 MAP sensor? Or a Gm 3 bar sensor?
#181
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
In the Stage II, standard 2.4 sensor.
Thanks again Sir. I assume then that Stage III and IV uses an LSJ or GM 3 bar? (You can PM me if you don't want to reveal proprietary info) just curious.
#182
Bill,
One thing that really bothers me about those dynos is that i drive on the freeway at 3K, that would be hitting full boost all the times... from those dynos its looks like drivablity and gas milage will suffer greatly. This also plays into powerband, with such small increases at higher rpms, this will have everyone short shifting like a ****.
What i would really like to see (and maybe people will disagree) is boost moved back to 3200-3500rpm (slower spool?) and full boost around 5k, that way the huge flat spot in the power band would be around 6k (more around where we would shift). example: stock 2.4L SRT-4
this would allow our cars to still be streetable around 2k-3k with stock-ish EPA numbers
One thing that really bothers me about those dynos is that i drive on the freeway at 3K, that would be hitting full boost all the times... from those dynos its looks like drivablity and gas milage will suffer greatly. This also plays into powerband, with such small increases at higher rpms, this will have everyone short shifting like a ****.
What i would really like to see (and maybe people will disagree) is boost moved back to 3200-3500rpm (slower spool?) and full boost around 5k, that way the huge flat spot in the power band would be around 6k (more around where we would shift). example: stock 2.4L SRT-4
this would allow our cars to still be streetable around 2k-3k with stock-ish EPA numbers
#183
Originally Posted by bigworm
Bill,
One thing that really bothers me about those dynos is that i drive on the freeway at 3K, that would be hitting full boost all the times... from those dynos its looks like drivablity and gas milage will suffer greatly. This also plays into powerband, with such small increases at higher rpms, this will have everyone short shifting like a ****.
What i would really like to see (and maybe people will disagree) is boost moved back to 3200-3500rpm (slower spool?) and full boost around 5k, that way the huge flat spot in the power band would be around 6k (more around where we would shift). example: stock 2.4L SRT-4
this would allow our cars to still be streetable around 2k-3k with stock-ish EPA numbers
One thing that really bothers me about those dynos is that i drive on the freeway at 3K, that would be hitting full boost all the times... from those dynos its looks like drivablity and gas milage will suffer greatly. This also plays into powerband, with such small increases at higher rpms, this will have everyone short shifting like a ****.
What i would really like to see (and maybe people will disagree) is boost moved back to 3200-3500rpm (slower spool?) and full boost around 5k, that way the huge flat spot in the power band would be around 6k (more around where we would shift). example: stock 2.4L SRT-4
this would allow our cars to still be streetable around 2k-3k with stock-ish EPA numbers
#185
Cruise is NOT wide open throttle!
Gentlemen! Unless you plan to cruise at wide open throttle, full boost, what you see on the dyno graphs has nothing at all to do with daily use at cruise and otherwise!
This is the true promise of turbocharging....a docile, economical engine at low throttle openings, and all the power you need at full throttle, with a nearly infinite selection of power levels at your command in between. We like to call it 'power on demand'...it's like having an infinitely variable supercharger, controlled by your right foot!
You might be surprised to find that much smaller turbos (such as seen on SRT-4) actually produce even less mileage than one of our systems, for those diminutive stock turbos just spool too quickly. We have testimonials from customers whose mileage has INCREASED when they fit one of our larger turbos!
As a final note, we've been getting numerous reports from our Solstice customers that their mileage has increased since the installation of our turbosystem. Efficiency seems to be the reason here...the turbo is recovering otherwise wasted energy, and they just don't need to use so much throttle for acceleration as they did before the turbo.
This is the true promise of turbocharging....a docile, economical engine at low throttle openings, and all the power you need at full throttle, with a nearly infinite selection of power levels at your command in between. We like to call it 'power on demand'...it's like having an infinitely variable supercharger, controlled by your right foot!
You might be surprised to find that much smaller turbos (such as seen on SRT-4) actually produce even less mileage than one of our systems, for those diminutive stock turbos just spool too quickly. We have testimonials from customers whose mileage has INCREASED when they fit one of our larger turbos!
As a final note, we've been getting numerous reports from our Solstice customers that their mileage has increased since the installation of our turbosystem. Efficiency seems to be the reason here...the turbo is recovering otherwise wasted energy, and they just don't need to use so much throttle for acceleration as they did before the turbo.
Last edited by Hahn RaceCraft; 08-19-2006 at 04:25 PM.
#186
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
Gentlemen! Unless you plan to cruise at wide open throttle, full boost, what you see on the dyno graphs has nothing at all to do with daily use at cruise and otherwise!
This is the true promise of turbocharging....a docile, economical engine at low throttle openings, and all the power you need at full throttle, with a nearly infinite selection of power levels at your command in between. We like to call it 'power on demand'...it's like having an infinitely variable supercharger, controlled by your right foot!
You might be surprised to find that much smaller turbos (such as seen on SRT-4) actually produce even less mileage than one of our systems, for those diminutive stock turbos just spool too quickly. We have testimonials from customers whose mileage has INREASED when they fit one of our larger turbos!
As a final note, we've been getting numerous reports from our Solstice customers that their mileage has increased since the installation of our turbosystem. Efficiency seems to be the reason here...the turbo is recovering otherwise wasted energy, and they just don't need to use so much throttle for acceleration as they did before the turbo.
This is the true promise of turbocharging....a docile, economical engine at low throttle openings, and all the power you need at full throttle, with a nearly infinite selection of power levels at your command in between. We like to call it 'power on demand'...it's like having an infinitely variable supercharger, controlled by your right foot!
You might be surprised to find that much smaller turbos (such as seen on SRT-4) actually produce even less mileage than one of our systems, for those diminutive stock turbos just spool too quickly. We have testimonials from customers whose mileage has INREASED when they fit one of our larger turbos!
As a final note, we've been getting numerous reports from our Solstice customers that their mileage has increased since the installation of our turbosystem. Efficiency seems to be the reason here...the turbo is recovering otherwise wasted energy, and they just don't need to use so much throttle for acceleration as they did before the turbo.
#192
Originally Posted by savior
yeah i dont wanna keep hearing my BOV when i am pulling into my gf driveway or when i am driving up to a nice restaurant lol..
#193
Originally Posted by savior
you've mentioned everything in the stage 2 turbo
whats included for the stage 1
a student like me cannot afford a stg2 right now, however i'd like the power for a stg1.. any pricing ideas
whats included for the stage 1
a student like me cannot afford a stg2 right now, however i'd like the power for a stg1.. any pricing ideas
good question!
#194
Originally Posted by savior
you've mentioned everything in the stage 2 turbo
whats included for the stage 1
a student like me cannot afford a stg2 right now, however i'd like the power for a stg1.. any pricing ideas
whats included for the stage 1
a student like me cannot afford a stg2 right now, however i'd like the power for a stg1.. any pricing ideas
#195
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
Gentlemen! Unless you plan to cruise at wide open throttle, full boost, what you see on the dyno graphs has nothing at all to do with daily use at cruise and otherwise!
Bill, i've been reading about your works in mags for years so please understand that this newb doesnt mean any bit of offence. That said, can you comment on the powerband question? It seems like the most gains are in the pre-4k range, this is the same issue we have without the turbo, we have nice power on the low-end, we suffer on the top-end. It doesnt look like this turbo kit will help that just add higher numbers. What i mean by moving the spool/boost back was if the turbo "kicked in" later, we'd keep the same traction levels we have now at lower rpms, and have more power at the top without the "table top" effect at shift. Maybe you have a stage with a tubine swap that better suits what im looking for?
Also on the gas milage, maybe the prototype guy can do some runs for us at different speeds? (65@~2.5k?/ 80@~3k?) and give us numbers?
#196
also, not only am i curious about stage 1 (along with the other members) but what post-turbo developement can we expect.
i know its early because you've only just completed the turbo, but at there going to be any extras such as the Stg2,3,4,5 that are available for the SC?
the bottom line is that i dont wanna get a turbo and be stuck at 240hp which the s/c are hitting 294 (highest hp rating as of a few days ago- check out the 2.0 section)
i know its early because you've only just completed the turbo, but at there going to be any extras such as the Stg2,3,4,5 that are available for the SC?
the bottom line is that i dont wanna get a turbo and be stuck at 240hp which the s/c are hitting 294 (highest hp rating as of a few days ago- check out the 2.0 section)
#197
there are numerous people on here questioning what stage 1 will be like...and i dont think there is a stage 1 ...from what ive taken in its starts off at stage 2....not many cars have "stage 1" upgrades.....i would assume stage 2 meant it was the stock version with turbo.....dunno though thats just my thought.,..itd be cool if there was a stage 1 though....cheaper and a nice starting point...
#198
Originally Posted by Shanman
sooo iguess that means faster than 140 right? would that break our needles or would we just have to approximate after 140? iguees theres a new tach on our shopping list also
#200
and if there isnt a stg 1, it'd just be smarter to exchange your 2.4 in for a 2.0 and then use the remaining 1500 dollars to buy stage upgrades for the 2.0, resulting in numbers near 300..
therefore, i cannot see how hanh will make a profit by pricing their turbo this high.. it just doesnt make any sense that way
plus not only would you get a 2.0 sc, you'd also get bigger rims, better suspension and struts, and a body kit..
therefore, i cannot see how hanh will make a profit by pricing their turbo this high.. it just doesnt make any sense that way
plus not only would you get a 2.0 sc, you'd also get bigger rims, better suspension and struts, and a body kit..