2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

Hahn Racecraft Cobalt SS 2.4 Turbo Prototype!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-2006 | 04:37 PM
  #176  
GTP's Avatar
GTP
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-28-06
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: Greensburg (PA)
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
We don't have solid 1/4 mile results yet on Cobalt, but as comparison...

Our Cavalier/Sunfire systems, when operated at similar power levels as this Stage II 2.4 kit, have resulted in mid-to-high 12's.
Our Solstice 2.4 car has gone 12.77 on street radials using a stock 2.4.
Our Sunfire 2.2, at Stage V power (but same turbosystem configuration as what we have here), with slicks and piston/rod upgrades has run low 11's @ 125 MPH.

Bill this was on the 20g right that you offer with your kit? I don't know the cost of the turbo (20g) but this new turbo, the RR500 from Helix, seems to kick the crap out of the 20g on the mid range, spool just as fast and offer almost "green" like top end.

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=1066413

Also is a ton cheaper than a comparable 20g. May be something to include in your kit to keep costs down. I have been following this from my subaru days.

Also what are you using for boost controller? It this part of the overall kit price as well?

Thanks Bill...we wait anxiously for the final product.
Old 08-17-2006 | 10:26 PM
  #177  
Shanman's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 06-21-06
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: NM
sooo iguess that means faster than 140 right? would that break our needles or would we just have to approximate after 140? iguees theres a new tach on our shopping list also
Old 08-18-2006 | 10:11 AM
  #178  
Hahn RaceCraft's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 07-07-06
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by GTP
Bill this was on the 20g right that you offer with your kit? I don't know the cost of the turbo (20g) but this new turbo, the RR500 from Helix, seems to kick the crap out of the 20g on the mid range, spool just as fast and offer almost "green" like top end.

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=1066413

Also is a ton cheaper than a comparable 20g. May be something to include in your kit to keep costs down. I have been following this from my subaru days.

Also what are you using for boost controller? It this part of the overall kit price as well?

Thanks Bill...we wait anxiously for the final product.
Yes, all these performances were with 20G. We love these units! Thanks for the input.

No boost controller needed...the turbocharger makes the boost pressure we designate.

Last edited by Hahn RaceCraft; 08-18-2006 at 02:36 PM.
Old 08-18-2006 | 01:38 PM
  #179  
GTP's Avatar
GTP
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-28-06
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: Greensburg (PA)
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
Yes, all these performances were with 20G. Thanks for the input. We love these units!

No boost controller needed...the turbocharger makes the boost pressure we designate.

Thanks Bill. Are you guys using the stock 2.4 MAP sensor? Or a Gm 3 bar sensor?
Old 08-18-2006 | 02:36 PM
  #180  
Hahn RaceCraft's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 07-07-06
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by GTP
Thanks Bill. Are you guys using the stock 2.4 MAP sensor? Or a Gm 3 bar sensor?
In the Stage II, standard 2.4 sensor.
Old 08-18-2006 | 02:40 PM
  #181  
GTP's Avatar
GTP
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-28-06
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: Greensburg (PA)
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
In the Stage II, standard 2.4 sensor.

Thanks again Sir. I assume then that Stage III and IV uses an LSJ or GM 3 bar? (You can PM me if you don't want to reveal proprietary info) just curious.
Old 08-19-2006 | 05:10 AM
  #182  
bigworm's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-06
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: Oakland, Ca
Bill,

One thing that really bothers me about those dynos is that i drive on the freeway at 3K, that would be hitting full boost all the times... from those dynos its looks like drivablity and gas milage will suffer greatly. This also plays into powerband, with such small increases at higher rpms, this will have everyone short shifting like a ****.

What i would really like to see (and maybe people will disagree) is boost moved back to 3200-3500rpm (slower spool?) and full boost around 5k, that way the huge flat spot in the power band would be around 6k (more around where we would shift). example: stock 2.4L SRT-4

this would allow our cars to still be streetable around 2k-3k with stock-ish EPA numbers
Old 08-19-2006 | 05:15 AM
  #183  
g5mike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-17-06
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
From: Moncton Newbrunswick Can.
Originally Posted by bigworm
Bill,

One thing that really bothers me about those dynos is that i drive on the freeway at 3K, that would be hitting full boost all the times... from those dynos its looks like drivablity and gas milage will suffer greatly. This also plays into powerband, with such small increases at higher rpms, this will have everyone short shifting like a ****.

What i would really like to see (and maybe people will disagree) is boost moved back to 3200-3500rpm (slower spool?) and full boost around 5k, that way the huge flat spot in the power band would be around 6k (more around where we would shift). example: stock 2.4L SRT-4

this would allow our cars to still be streetable around 2k-3k with stock-ish EPA numbers
Great insight,alot of peaple will for sure want to keep the everyday driability of their car
Old 08-19-2006 | 02:50 PM
  #184  
savior's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-06
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
yeah i dont wanna keep hearing my BOV when i am pulling into my gf driveway or when i am driving up to a nice restaurant lol..
Old 08-19-2006 | 02:50 PM
  #185  
Hahn RaceCraft's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 07-07-06
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Cruise is NOT wide open throttle!

Gentlemen! Unless you plan to cruise at wide open throttle, full boost, what you see on the dyno graphs has nothing at all to do with daily use at cruise and otherwise!

This is the true promise of turbocharging....a docile, economical engine at low throttle openings, and all the power you need at full throttle, with a nearly infinite selection of power levels at your command in between. We like to call it 'power on demand'...it's like having an infinitely variable supercharger, controlled by your right foot!

You might be surprised to find that much smaller turbos (such as seen on SRT-4) actually produce even less mileage than one of our systems, for those diminutive stock turbos just spool too quickly. We have testimonials from customers whose mileage has INCREASED when they fit one of our larger turbos!

As a final note, we've been getting numerous reports from our Solstice customers that their mileage has increased since the installation of our turbosystem. Efficiency seems to be the reason here...the turbo is recovering otherwise wasted energy, and they just don't need to use so much throttle for acceleration as they did before the turbo.

Last edited by Hahn RaceCraft; 08-19-2006 at 04:25 PM.
Old 08-19-2006 | 03:03 PM
  #186  
g5mike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-17-06
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
From: Moncton Newbrunswick Can.
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
Gentlemen! Unless you plan to cruise at wide open throttle, full boost, what you see on the dyno graphs has nothing at all to do with daily use at cruise and otherwise!

This is the true promise of turbocharging....a docile, economical engine at low throttle openings, and all the power you need at full throttle, with a nearly infinite selection of power levels at your command in between. We like to call it 'power on demand'...it's like having an infinitely variable supercharger, controlled by your right foot!

You might be surprised to find that much smaller turbos (such as seen on SRT-4) actually produce even less mileage than one of our systems, for those diminutive stock turbos just spool too quickly. We have testimonials from customers whose mileage has INREASED when they fit one of our larger turbos!

As a final note, we've been getting numerous reports from our Solstice customers that their mileage has increased since the installation of our turbosystem. Efficiency seems to be the reason here...the turbo is recovering otherwise wasted energy, and they just don't need to use so much throttle for acceleration as they did before the turbo.
actually on the soltice forums I seen som of them did get better gas milage
Old 08-19-2006 | 04:14 PM
  #187  
JohnnySasakiMGS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-30-06
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 1
From: Upstate NY
OMG COME ON! ENOUGH FOREPLAY! My ***** are getting blue here SOMEONE GET DARKLORD A VIDEO CAMERA!
Old 08-19-2006 | 04:24 PM
  #188  
g5mike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-17-06
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
From: Moncton Newbrunswick Can.
Originally Posted by JohnnySasakiMGS
OMG COME ON! ENOUGH FOREPLAY! My ***** are getting blue here SOMEONE GET DARKLORD A VIDEO CAMERA!
Old 08-19-2006 | 05:09 PM
  #189  
b00st3d's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-16-06
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Poinciana, FL
So maybe half of my question was answered by a post saying that they did a 2.2 sunfire but will a 2.2 cobalt kit be available?
Old 08-19-2006 | 05:11 PM
  #190  
b00st3d's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-16-06
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Poinciana, FL
well I just went to the web site it looks like one is in progress
Old 08-20-2006 | 12:52 AM
  #191  
savior's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-06
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
you've mentioned everything in the stage 2 turbo

whats included for the stage 1

a student like me cannot afford a stg2 right now, however i'd like the power for a stg1.. any pricing ideas
Old 08-20-2006 | 02:08 AM
  #192  
k2kwj's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-14-06
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, Fl
Originally Posted by savior
yeah i dont wanna keep hearing my BOV when i am pulling into my gf driveway or when i am driving up to a nice restaurant lol..
let me get this straight you dont like the sound of a blow off valve? or do you have an automatic and dont want that to be obvious. cause i never get tired of hearing badass sounds on my car. lol
Old 08-20-2006 | 02:12 AM
  #193  
Dragonsfire12345's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio,TX
Originally Posted by savior
you've mentioned everything in the stage 2 turbo

whats included for the stage 1

a student like me cannot afford a stg2 right now, however i'd like the power for a stg1.. any pricing ideas

good question!
Old 08-20-2006 | 08:17 AM
  #194  
g5mike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-17-06
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
From: Moncton Newbrunswick Can.
Originally Posted by savior
you've mentioned everything in the stage 2 turbo

whats included for the stage 1

a student like me cannot afford a stg2 right now, however i'd like the power for a stg1.. any pricing ideas
Stage 1 intriques me, due to what I want and affordability
Old 08-20-2006 | 08:41 AM
  #195  
bigworm's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-06
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: Oakland, Ca
Originally Posted by EcoBoost
Gentlemen! Unless you plan to cruise at wide open throttle, full boost, what you see on the dyno graphs has nothing at all to do with daily use at cruise and otherwise!
You've never driven in oakland before.

Bill, i've been reading about your works in mags for years so please understand that this newb doesnt mean any bit of offence. That said, can you comment on the powerband question? It seems like the most gains are in the pre-4k range, this is the same issue we have without the turbo, we have nice power on the low-end, we suffer on the top-end. It doesnt look like this turbo kit will help that just add higher numbers. What i mean by moving the spool/boost back was if the turbo "kicked in" later, we'd keep the same traction levels we have now at lower rpms, and have more power at the top without the "table top" effect at shift. Maybe you have a stage with a tubine swap that better suits what im looking for?

Also on the gas milage, maybe the prototype guy can do some runs for us at different speeds? (65@~2.5k?/ 80@~3k?) and give us numbers?
Old 08-20-2006 | 01:29 PM
  #196  
savior's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-06
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
also, not only am i curious about stage 1 (along with the other members) but what post-turbo developement can we expect.

i know its early because you've only just completed the turbo, but at there going to be any extras such as the Stg2,3,4,5 that are available for the SC?

the bottom line is that i dont wanna get a turbo and be stuck at 240hp which the s/c are hitting 294 (highest hp rating as of a few days ago- check out the 2.0 section)
Old 08-20-2006 | 02:48 PM
  #197  
mike25's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-07-06
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 1
From: west virginia
there are numerous people on here questioning what stage 1 will be like...and i dont think there is a stage 1 ...from what ive taken in its starts off at stage 2....not many cars have "stage 1" upgrades.....i would assume stage 2 meant it was the stock version with turbo.....dunno though thats just my thought.,..itd be cool if there was a stage 1 though....cheaper and a nice starting point...
Old 08-20-2006 | 02:50 PM
  #198  
mike25's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-07-06
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 1
From: west virginia
Originally Posted by Shanman
sooo iguess that means faster than 140 right? would that break our needles or would we just have to approximate after 140? iguees theres a new tach on our shopping list also
no adding the turbo will not make it go faster than 140....in terms it could.....but the car isnt aerodynamically designed to go faster than 140....maybe just a bit but it would be pushing it....the limiter will more than likely be kept at 140.....
Old 08-20-2006 | 02:53 PM
  #199  
savior's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-06
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
ummm... mike... our car is the same design as the ss s/c and it goes faster than 140
Old 08-20-2006 | 02:55 PM
  #200  
savior's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-06
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
and if there isnt a stg 1, it'd just be smarter to exchange your 2.4 in for a 2.0 and then use the remaining 1500 dollars to buy stage upgrades for the 2.0, resulting in numbers near 300..

therefore, i cannot see how hanh will make a profit by pricing their turbo this high.. it just doesnt make any sense that way

plus not only would you get a 2.0 sc, you'd also get bigger rims, better suspension and struts, and a body kit..


Quick Reply: Hahn Racecraft Cobalt SS 2.4 Turbo Prototype!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 AM.