different bumpers...v6 has single exhaust (not reliable tho as many people go duals as first mod), gt has big cow eye fog lights while the 6 has none or small ones surrounded in chrome like my car does, the v6 has black side skirts while the gt has body color ones...

 

There's only one way to beat him fairly.

Put a gallon of gas in each car and race him to a city 30 miles away.

Just be comforted by the fact that he took 40% more displacement, 50% more cylinders and F/I to beat you.

Just have him pull off 2 plug wires and race him. Then It would be fair

I don't consider any car that gets less than 30mpg hwy in my "class."

 

actually with equal drivers he would more than likely have beaten him stock...LOL. you're right tho they are not in the same class at all.

 

simply wait for some thousand miles, and when his FORD falls apart, just pass next to him and give him the ricer fly-by...

 

there are more than a few rangers with the same engine that have well over 150,000 miles. next.

 

What year Mustang GT ???? you never specified , and what year is his v6 that would also help

he might be talking about an 04 v6

like i said we still dont know what year the v6 is
i call bullshit unless it was auto and he was asleep at the wheel

yeah too bad were not talking about a supercharged GT were talking supercharged v6 Reading >You BIG TIME

and as for you i dont take anything you say seriously your like 16 and a soph in high school , is the v6 mustang your first car???

 

Yep i'm 16 and a junior in high school, i paid for more than half of my car, and the greatest part is I probably know more about your car than you do.

Oh and it's YOU'RE not YOUR. Grammar > you.

oh and 2.4...

05=2005. We know what year it is.

 

u wont win ever sry to tell u

inless u bolt up a s/c or turbo

 

not true at all...rygen on the mustang forums ran 12.4's with about those numbers in an automatic. you are forgetting how much harder a rwd car can launch and that those numbers are at the wheels...that would put him around 400 ft lbs at the crank with linear power delivery on a 3300 lb car....that can for sure run those times...maybe not on street tires, but on dr's it is definately doable. most drivers run low 15's in a stock 4.0, it is rare that you will see anything like a 15.5 or higher...mostly 15.0's to 15.3's a few slower a few faster. again, thread starter, do you know what kinda blower it is? i can tell you alot about wether or not he is telling the truth by knowing what blower it is at what boost with what other mods (just need a general idea of what else he has.)


edit: i actually think rygen lives in maryland....this isn't a black stang with red stripes is it? if this is rygens car, you are probably never going to be able to catch up as he was running mid-low 12's on pretty low boost on the stock motor (i beleive 9.5/10?) and he just had a built block put it and will be running close to 20 psi....that is gonna be a low 11/high ten second car LOL.

 

The only way to beat him is to develop more HP and TQ than him. Start saving your money now for a complete engine build and a power adder. And by the time you do all that, he will have even more done than he does now.

 

hahahahahaha i dont even want to start with you, you dont know more about my car than i do your about as dumb as the corvette driver that wanted to race me from a dig last night when it was wet outside o yeah he was in high school also

 

once again it's YOU'RE or YOU ARE. Don't start **** with me unless you plan on proving you are right...everytime i have called you out on **** you have just dissapeared from the thread. Why does it matter that i am in high school? do you really care that much about me being in high school? It's pretty sad that you are this immature even though you are out of high school.

 

everytime you call me out about what??? You called me out about me putting stage 2 and not putting a comma between that an the airbox mod wow congratulations , sorry kid you dont know more about MY car than i do

i leave and disappear from the thread bc i think your COMPLETELY IMMATURE for saying that you know more about my car than me, YOU NOT EVEN WORTH MY TIME WITH YOUR STUPID STATEMENTS

 

with 335rwhp an 06 stang can run mid 12's with minor suspension work and either 3.73 or 4.10 gears and he has to be a good driver. Not that rare.

 

Thats funny considering a 300hp 05+ Stang GT cant break 13's unless its a pro driving. And its stick. And your running slicks. And higher than a 3.55 rear end. Well, hell, I dont know what/why im arguing, I dont even tay that much appention to Fords anyhoo.

And someone said something about linear power delivery? What is linear about a front engine rear wheel drive Mustangs differential? The reason it can launch harder is because all that torque loads the drive wheels. (hence, wheelstands) Unlike a Cobalt where the weight is shifted off the drive wheels (hence an SRT4's massive wheelhop/spin).

And to end my mini-novel, everyone needs to quit beating up on Mustangs, its not their fault that Ford tried to build a muscle car that needs to double as a grocery getter.

Get a Z28 and walk all over that SC V6 with nothing more than a stall, gears, and slicks.

 

well considering almost all of the members on the mustang forums that own an s197 gt have 13 second timeslips for their cars bone stock down to the rubber and a few have run as low as 13.3's stock, i'd say your first paragraph was retarded. oh and just to add to that, these mid-high 13 sec gt's make 300 CRANK horsepower, while this guy is making 335 at the wheels which is closer to 370+ at the crank, plus the v6 is almost 200 pounds lighter and has better weight distribution.

now for the second one...linear power delivery= a very flat torque curve.

You really have no idea what you are talking about do you?

 

turbo kit w/ I,H,E and nitrous would beat him
or trade ur car in get a v6 supercahrge mustang and beat him and say u gots the driver mod haha

 

ROFL Some mustang guys I have met get their feelings hurt real quick.

Just put Jason Wheitfeilds car up on the track. How much hp is that anyways? 1200 or something on a v-4 turbo cobalt...

 

v4???? that would be a very funny looking motor..... lol funny looking headers for it too haa

 

why do you think Evos and STi's are so fast...v4 motors!

 

Thanks everyone,

I have officially given up on trying to race this guy.......

For those asking It is a 2005 v6 running a Vortech @10 PSI, LCA's, Detroit differential lock, custom headers and exhaust and UDP's.

I have brushed my knowledge on the new s197 (that's tyhe new mustangs).

Eco_Junk those figures are crank horses, 8cd03gro you are absolutely correct on your statements....... as I have come to find out.

Thanks everyone!!!

 

STi is not a v4 they are a boxer style engine. And Lancer Evos have I4's

 

not gonna flame you.. but just go ahead and stop because you do not know as much as you think you do about mustangs..

 

no such thing as a v4.....

 

well, that's not true, but the cars he listed do not have v4's.

The sti has a boxer, 2 banks of 2, but the 2 banks are 180 degrees apart, so it is not a boxer. I am unaware of any V-4's in any automotive application, but I have seen theme numerous times in marine applications (outboard motors typically)