2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

How much HP for Fully bolted N/A ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2009 | 04:37 PM
  #76  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,687
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
The correct answer to the question is about 212hp. IMO the most hp you can possibly hope to ever make with a fully bolted and aggressively tuned LE5 is 212. Beyond that youre gonna need internal work or serious custom fabbed parts.
Old 12-09-2009 | 04:53 PM
  #77  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Maven
The correct answer to the question is about 212hp. IMO the most hp you can possibly hope to ever make with a fully bolted and aggressively tuned LE5 is 212. Beyond that youre gonna need internal work or serious custom fabbed parts.
thats an unusually specific number there maven...
Old 12-09-2009 | 05:10 PM
  #78  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
thats an unusually specific number there maven...
got to agree. Got some experiance there maven?
Old 12-09-2009 | 05:52 PM
  #79  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,687
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
No comment, thats just my input
Old 12-09-2009 | 10:00 PM
  #80  
dtabbs's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 11-11-06
Posts: 232
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, Fl
I see according to this thread "Official Dyno Numbers" that I am still in at number 2 after two years of doing nothing to my car as well as Mike (REDFOCZ) who no longer has his. So the number would be 186whp or mine at 181whp.

That is with full bolt on's only, NO cams or head work.
Old 12-09-2009 | 10:55 PM
  #81  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by dtabbs
I see according to this thread "Official Dyno Numbers" that I am still in at number 2 after two years of doing nothing to my car as well as Mike (REDFOCZ) who no longer has his. So the number would be 186whp or mine at 181whp.

That is with full bolt on's only, NO cams or head work.
So you had throttle body,header,downpipe,catback,crank pulley,cold air intake and a tune? not doubting just seriously asking your mods. Also what year and transmission (guessing a 5 spd..)
Old 12-10-2009 | 06:43 AM
  #82  
RedBalt44's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 05-18-09
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Fort Leonard Wood, MO
wow this thread is still going. anyway my final decision is to get a zzp supercharger kit when it comes out. N/A is just not enough.
Old 12-13-2009 | 11:53 PM
  #83  
rtullos808's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-22-09
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
fixxed
Wow, we finally agree. Another typo though. "The 2.0 is considered the superior car because it has more torgue, but the fact that car has more horsepower isnt gonna make the car top out at any speed higher than a 2.4." The word "horsepower" in the previous sentence was supposed to be "torque". Damn, up too late at night. I realize sustained torgue begins at the crank, I used "drivetrain" collectively, my opinion being the crankshaft is considered part of the drivetrain. Some don't, I do.

Last edited by rtullos808; 12-13-2009 at 11:56 PM. Reason: Typos
Old 12-14-2009 | 12:59 AM
  #84  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
im confused how you're saying we finally agree when i contradicted everything you said..?
Old 12-14-2009 | 01:58 AM
  #85  
rtullos808's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-22-09
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Are you serious? It didnt seem like that to me.

"When changing gears, you sacrifice speed for torque, or vice versa."
You actually added information, not a disagreement.

"Thats also horsepower... theyre effectively the same, being one is a derivative of the other."
This too is more added information. Maybe this is where you thought we disagreed. Yes they
are derivative of each other. NO, they are NOT effectively the same. That is an opinion.

You may think they are effectively the same, I disagree. But we could both be right. Oh by the way,
I'm going to check out your pics. Wanna see if you have the strut bar still.

hmmm, no pics. its cool. how much was the strut bar 9dc sport)?

hmmm, no pics. its cool. how much was the strut bar (dc sport)?

damnit. sorry for the doubleposts

Last edited by rtullos808; 12-14-2009 at 01:58 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 12-14-2009 | 02:21 AM
  #86  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
they are the same because you cannot take just a cars HP number or a cars TQ number. it depends completely on the RPM. a car that makes more torque than horsepower is effectively just saying its HP curve is flatter than if it werent. You say "thats torque" as if you are explaining the difference between torque and horsepower, when they are effectively both just ratings of how fast the car will go. one is just the other times the current RPM.

You also said top speed remains the same...i corrected you and said top speed lowers

The "thats EXACTLY what it means" comment should be self explanatory

and powertrain =/= drivetrain the drivetrain is part of the powertrain, but not necessarily the other way around

and it was sold a while back. lemme update my thread
Old 01-16-2010 | 01:56 PM
  #87  
wesg631's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-09-09
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
ok i'm doing full bolt ons now and gonna get it tuned and dynoed and finally put this to rest mods i have K&N intake, i have a magnaflow catback, just bought a cti header and dp, i have an lsj throttle body gonna buy the adapter plate next pay day maybe sooner then save up for a tune unless someone around oklahoma will give me one for cheap, then get track times and dyno numbers, i plan on doing head work cams later on i plan on having a 250 whp na cobalt ohh yea its an 07 auto
Old 01-16-2010 | 05:58 PM
  #88  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by wesg631
ok i'm doing full bolt ons now and gonna get it tuned and dynoed and finally put this to rest mods i have K&N intake, i have a magnaflow catback, just bought a cti header and dp, i have an lsj throttle body gonna buy the adapter plate next pay day maybe sooner then save up for a tune unless someone around oklahoma will give me one for cheap, then get track times and dyno numbers, i plan on doing head work cams later on i plan on having a 250 whp na cobalt ohh yea its an 07 auto
Im going to say goodluck. Especially with the auto... I cant see cams and head work getting you 70-80whp. Not to mention the aggressive cams you would require for that kind of gain would also require a new higher stall torque converter. Now 170whp should be pretty easy.
Old 01-16-2010 | 06:04 PM
  #89  
wesg631's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-09-09
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
Well I gonna try to do whatever to get that 200 with just bolt ons I kow 250 is high for na but if I could get into the 14's with a na buils I would be very happy
Old 01-16-2010 | 06:10 PM
  #90  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by wesg631
Well I gonna try to do whatever to get that 200 with just bolt ons I kow 250 is high for na but if I could get into the 14's with a na buils I would be very happy
from what ive felt with my car I believe a high 14 is possible for a full bolt on 2.4 auto. Red07SSNA got a 14.5 ouy of his 5 spd. typical rule of thumb is autos are a half second slower. So it seems possible but not easy.
Old 01-17-2010 | 04:45 PM
  #91  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by wesg631
Well I gonna try to do whatever to get that 200 with just bolt ons I kow 250 is high for na but if I could get into the 14's with a na buils I would be very happy
a set of DRs, a couple bolt ons, and a great driver can get 14's with a 2.4. Its getting into the low 14's thats a real challenge
Old 01-17-2010 | 05:16 PM
  #92  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
heres some inspiration for ya. But hes a 5spd.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHHO51LfHGk
Old 01-17-2010 | 05:25 PM
  #93  
wesg631's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-09-09
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
What all bolt ons did he have I think I'm gonna try an beat that even though he is a 5 speed
Old 01-17-2010 | 05:38 PM
  #94  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by wesg631
What all bolt ons did he have I think I'm gonna try an beat that even though he is a 5 speed
lol not sure but hes on here. But I think he pretty much had all that you can have
Old 01-17-2010 | 09:12 PM
  #95  
wesg631's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-09-09
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
Damn hopefully I have a factory freak then
Old 01-17-2010 | 09:35 PM
  #96  
seekNdestroy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-10-08
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale fla
Originally Posted by rtullos808

Torgue is when your 305 Hp 5.0 gets an upgrade from a worn out 7.5 inch rear end to a fresh 9 inch Dana LSD. Top speed remains the same but the time it takes to get to that top speed increases. Which my result in the entire back half of your car being ripped apart.

.


taht would be traction, not torque
Old 01-19-2010 | 02:47 PM
  #97  
wesg631's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-09-09
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
If that video is of 07RedSSNA then there is hope for me because he was an auto I just searched his threads and he was the one that found out that the lsj down pipe needs modification to fit on an auto 2.2l or 2.4l awesome
Old 01-19-2010 | 03:00 PM
  #98  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by wesg631
If that video is of 07RedSSNA then there is hope for me because he was an auto I just searched his threads and he was the one that found out that the lsj down pipe needs modification to fit on an auto 2.2l or 2.4l awesome
I messed up on the member name.

It was just RedSSna

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/members/redssna-14549/



Sorry 07RedSSNA is who I bought my jet modules from!
Old 01-19-2010 | 03:54 PM
  #99  
wesg631's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-09-09
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
Oh did those jet modules do anything for you?
Old 01-19-2010 | 06:27 PM
  #100  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by wesg631
Oh did those jet modules do anything for you?
Heres my review of them.
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-4l-le5-performance-tech-46/jet-module-stage-2-review-198146/


Quick Reply: How much HP for Fully bolted N/A ?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:19 AM.