How would win?
#76
here are the top dyno numbers that have been verified on this site.
2.4L - Naturally Aspirated
1. noorjariri, 201whp 188wtq, Verified Mustang Dyno, I,F,H,DP,E,T,TB Graph1,Graph2
2. newt 193whp 179wtq,Verified Dynojet, I,F,H,T,42s,TB,PH,C,CO Graph
3. Hotpursuit 170whp, 174wtq Verified Dynojet, I,Fr,H,DP,E,T,DR,CD,CO Graph
4. steddy2112 167 whp, 166 wtq Verified I, E Graph
ok now that you see that do you still think you will make your 215 whp? no. the top spot was on a dyno that according to many members is a number happy dyno but it did have graphs so nothing we can do about that. not taking anything away from him.
also those cars are manual cars and yours is auto which also robs more power out of the car. if you happened to keep up with the gtp while having 3 passengers in your car then that gtp needs a seriouuus driver mod. either he was ******* with you or he just fell asleep at the wheel. there is absolutely no reason you should have been anywhere close to him with the amount of weight you had in the car and the amount of modifications done to both of your cars.
I didnt want to start saying stuff but this just got way too stupid for me to stay quiet lol. You said you are going to dyno in 2-3 weeks. Well thats cool but i already know we arent going to see any graphs. Either you aren't actually going to dyno, or you will dyno then be embarrassed by the numbers you put down and never post the graph on this website.
2.4L - Naturally Aspirated
1. noorjariri, 201whp 188wtq, Verified Mustang Dyno, I,F,H,DP,E,T,TB Graph1,Graph2
2. newt 193whp 179wtq,Verified Dynojet, I,F,H,T,42s,TB,PH,C,CO Graph
3. Hotpursuit 170whp, 174wtq Verified Dynojet, I,Fr,H,DP,E,T,DR,CD,CO Graph
4. steddy2112 167 whp, 166 wtq Verified I, E Graph
ok now that you see that do you still think you will make your 215 whp? no. the top spot was on a dyno that according to many members is a number happy dyno but it did have graphs so nothing we can do about that. not taking anything away from him.
also those cars are manual cars and yours is auto which also robs more power out of the car. if you happened to keep up with the gtp while having 3 passengers in your car then that gtp needs a seriouuus driver mod. either he was ******* with you or he just fell asleep at the wheel. there is absolutely no reason you should have been anywhere close to him with the amount of weight you had in the car and the amount of modifications done to both of your cars.
I didnt want to start saying stuff but this just got way too stupid for me to stay quiet lol. You said you are going to dyno in 2-3 weeks. Well thats cool but i already know we arent going to see any graphs. Either you aren't actually going to dyno, or you will dyno then be embarrassed by the numbers you put down and never post the graph on this website.
#77
Those grand prix are not fast. and just because you beat someone on the street doesnt mean you will at the drag strip. I beat a 2011 v6 camaro on the street and they run 14s at the track. so there for it would win.
and @ twooz-he's just basing his info from the internet and phone apps lmao. I did that once and it said I'd run a 16 sec 1/4 and i had 120-140hp lol.
and @ twooz-he's just basing his info from the internet and phone apps lmao. I did that once and it said I'd run a 16 sec 1/4 and i had 120-140hp lol.
#83
So what you're telling me (is that) even though my car (stock) is 171 horsepower and runs a 7.1 (ish) second 0-60, and a 15.6 second Quarter mile SOURCES: []Chevrolet Cobalt SS - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, and [http://www.zeroto60times.com/Chevrol...ph-Times.html] (And yes, I'm aware the Cobalt S is listed for zeroto60times.com, that even after just having maintenance, and modding what I did, that I would end up with less horsepower than stock, run slower 0-60 and 1/4 mile times, and that (according to you) that I didn't notice a gain from my res delete/cat delete + Magnaflow Muffler?
Honestly I'm about to dyno (hopefully) within the next 2-3 weeks. And to you "not trying to be a dick", you can lick my butt hole..
Honestly I'm about to dyno (hopefully) within the next 2-3 weeks. And to you "not trying to be a dick", you can lick my butt hole..
#84
#85
Is he deleting comments or something because it looks like chevygirl is just continually posting lol either way this guy is gonna get laughed off the forum or cry when he actually gets dynoed and sees where he is actually at
#91
My times are proven at the track lol.
Can't base things off what you read on the Internet. Stock ss/sc aren't even running 14.4s
And there's no way a ss 2.4 can have 215 hp while being na. You will need cams at least and slicks. You have an intake,muffler,header and a tune. I'd say around 165whp. And plus you are an auto. That kills a lot of power.
Can't base things off what you read on the Internet. Stock ss/sc aren't even running 14.4s
And there's no way a ss 2.4 can have 215 hp while being na. You will need cams at least and slicks. You have an intake,muffler,header and a tune. I'd say around 165whp. And plus you are an auto. That kills a lot of power.
#94
You can't be serious.. so what I'm getting from your post is that the GM site and any other site with specs that say there's 171hp going through my car are actually lying? And 8.2 is for the 2.2L Even at the top of every thread in this forum section for 2.4 it clearly states: "171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque" and an 8.3 second 0-60 is not accurate. You don't lose 1.2 seconds with the automatic version.. I'd be glad to send pics of my numbers if/when I hit the track and dyno. Glad to..
Please do post pics of your numbers when you hit the track and dyno. I'm sure we would all appreciate some good laughing material.
#95
thats what hes saying. no one here measures crank horsepower which is stupid to be thinking in those terms. **** gets measured in what you actually put down on the ground which is whp not what the engine itself puts out.
#96
You can't be serious.. so what I'm getting from your post is that the GM site and any other site with specs that say there's 171hp going through my car are actually lying? And 8.2 is for the 2.2L Even at the top of every thread in this forum section for 2.4 it clearly states: "171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque" and an 8.3 second 0-60 is not accurate. You don't lose 1.2 seconds with the automatic version.. I'd be glad to send pics of my numbers if/when I hit the track and dyno. Glad to..
yup my car is slow but racing is still fun
Last edited by chevygirl2006; 09-26-2012 at 04:40 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#97
You can't be serious.. so what I'm getting from your post is that the GM site and any other site with specs that say there's 171hp going through my car are actually lying? And 8.2 is for the 2.2L Even at the top of every thread in this forum section for 2.4 it clearly states: "171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque" and an 8.3 second 0-60 is not accurate. You don't lose 1.2 seconds with the automatic version.. I'd be glad to send pics of my numbers if/when I hit the track and dyno. Glad to..
ZZPerformance - 2.2/2.4L Bolt on Supercharger Kit #ZZ-2224SCKT
The dyno sheet on that page shows that a stock auto 2.4 put down 145. Supercharged it put down 225. So 215 with an intake, exhaust, and tune on your car won't get you remotely close to 215. Even 215 at the crank is very unlikely, and nobody reads horsepower from the crank except for the manufacturers anyway
#100