HPtuners Tune for 2.4
#26
The Stock duty cycle I saw on SSFamily Wagons Car was 98% in second gear, I can't imagine higher gears. We got the IDC down to 76% Max at top of third (Automatic), with the SS/SC injectors.
The Lean code is a serious condition. Make sure that you are using only Premium fuel all the time, because if you don't it will set off the lean code as well. The Premium takes longer to burn, thus making the car less lean, and lower cylinder temps.
The Lean code is a serious condition. Make sure that you are using only Premium fuel all the time, because if you don't it will set off the lean code as well. The Premium takes longer to burn, thus making the car less lean, and lower cylinder temps.
#27
My CEL was on and off when I had only my AEM cai. But when I got my XTC de-cat downpipe, it came on.......and never went off. I had a Weapon-R CEL eliminator, but clearence issues kept it from tightening in all the way, and it ended up getting ripped off by something on the road. Needless to say, I put only the O2 sensor back in after that incident. With the CEL eliminator on, it ran noticeably better. Some people say that CEL's dont hinder performance, but I beg to differ. And with me probally having multiple CEL's from multiple performance parts, I know my is a far cry from correct performance.
#29
yeah, but every car is different. And my mods differ from yours. I'd really like a tune directly for my car. However, I could use one of his tunes to give to Doc when I meet up w/ him on the 27th, and Doc could use it as a base to go off of.
#30
Tuned PCM's
I think it would be pretty cool if we had a section on this site for nothing but tuned files that people have uploaded and have the specs of the car and mods that have been done.Even with the hp numbers so everyone can download them and compare their tunes with the others.We could have a library of pretuned pcm files!
#31
I think it would be pretty cool if we had a section on this site for nothing but tuned files that people have uploaded and have the specs of the car and mods that have been done.Even with the hp numbers so everyone can download them and compare their tunes with the others.We could have a library of pretuned pcm files!
#32
I'd do it..I told you I wouldn't charge you.
#34
#35
Well i'm still coming on the 27th, so hopefully you'll have time to fit the lone 2.4 of the group in, lol. Nah man, I can't let you do it for free though. If your there devoting your time to helping someone else, especially considering your taking the day off to be there helping everyone, then I gotta give ya something. At least like $25-$50 or something.
#38
#39
Ahh ethics. This is how I see it.
Why is it illegal to "share" music files made by professional musicians? Because they have thousands of hours in practice, exceptional talent and a large sum of money invested in creating and producing their work which is legally their "intelectual property". They therefore deserve to get paid. The price they charge is set by the free market ie. supply vs. demand.
A professional or even an ameteur tuner's "intelectual property" could be similarly classed.
I see no ethical problems with someone being compensated for their work. I paid $400 for a Wester's tune (plus shipping) - mainly because hp tuners for the 2.4 was not available at the time, and Westers has a great reputation, customer support and stands behind their product 100%.
I would have certainly paid a fair price for a tune done by a private individual or a small company that delivers similar results.
If you want to give your work away for free, I see no problem with that either. Some people place no value on their work, or believe it has no commercial value. Some are wealthy and give their work away as an act of charity to those less fortunate - an altruistic choice.
If however, like most of us, you need to earn a profit to: feed and clothe your family, and pay for your expenses involved with creating the tune ie. the cost of hp tuners, dyno testing, and data logging (tickets?) to further improve your tune, you need to charge something for your work. If not, you won't be able to afford to improve your tune, so no one will benefit from your talents. IMHO
Why is it illegal to "share" music files made by professional musicians? Because they have thousands of hours in practice, exceptional talent and a large sum of money invested in creating and producing their work which is legally their "intelectual property". They therefore deserve to get paid. The price they charge is set by the free market ie. supply vs. demand.
A professional or even an ameteur tuner's "intelectual property" could be similarly classed.
I see no ethical problems with someone being compensated for their work. I paid $400 for a Wester's tune (plus shipping) - mainly because hp tuners for the 2.4 was not available at the time, and Westers has a great reputation, customer support and stands behind their product 100%.
I would have certainly paid a fair price for a tune done by a private individual or a small company that delivers similar results.
If you want to give your work away for free, I see no problem with that either. Some people place no value on their work, or believe it has no commercial value. Some are wealthy and give their work away as an act of charity to those less fortunate - an altruistic choice.
If however, like most of us, you need to earn a profit to: feed and clothe your family, and pay for your expenses involved with creating the tune ie. the cost of hp tuners, dyno testing, and data logging (tickets?) to further improve your tune, you need to charge something for your work. If not, you won't be able to afford to improve your tune, so no one will benefit from your talents. IMHO
#40
Im looking into both HPT and Vector for tuning, just not sure which one to choose. Im willing to learn HPT, but I dont have access to a dyno. Vector would be the easy choice, but Im going to upgrade to he 34# injectors soon. Anybody have advice on which tune would be the better choice?
p.s. Not trying to hack the thread, I believe this is pretty relevant
p.s. Not trying to hack the thread, I believe this is pretty relevant
#41
Exactly. I got a $445 ticket for scanning my car with HPTuners while only going 12 over the speed limit. The HPTuners classified it as a Criminal activity. Because of junk like that there are costs and risks associated with these tunes.
Your Comment is very relevant. Buy HPTuners for the extra $100, and then you can flash my tune to it for the 34#'s, or someone elses tune for that matter, and then use the HPT for making money on the side once you figure out what you are doing.
Im looking into both HPT and Vector for tuning, just not sure which one to choose. Im willing to learn HPT, but I dont have access to a dyno. Vector would be the easy choice, but Im going to upgrade to he 34# injectors soon. Anybody have advice on which tune would be the better choice?
p.s. Not trying to hack the thread, I believe this is pretty relevant
p.s. Not trying to hack the thread, I believe this is pretty relevant
Last edited by Psykostevo; 03-20-2007 at 01:33 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#43
#44
How to Tune and Modify Engine Management Systems - Hartman (ISBN 0-7603-1582-5)
Haynes High-performance tuning - Engine Management - Walker (ISBN 1-85960-835-3)
Engine Builders Handbook - Monroe (ISBN 1-55788-245-2)
HPBooks Auto Math Handbook - Lawlor (ISBN 1-55788-020-4)
If you want to learn more, come to the meet on the 7th in Frederick and I'll give you a run down.
#48
I see nothing wrong with giving tunes away, and I see nothing wrong with charging for it. I have always been fair and reasonable with my pricing, and I have yet to hear someone complain. Nothing in life is free, you will pay for it in someway.
#49
I still haven't had a chance to upload them onto my desktop, I gotta work on Marc's car tonight so I don't know if I"ll have time. Want to wait on that cause I wanted to try some new stuff first.