2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

Installed a K&N intake, and LOST 2whp...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2010 | 12:05 AM
  #1  
2008G5GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 09-10-08
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC
Installed a K&N intake, and LOST 2whp...

So, I have an '08 2.L Auto.

I had my car dynoed on November 21st:



77*F, 16% humidity, 87 octane.

Then I installed a K&N Short Ram and ran it for a month.

I had it dynoed again today:



44*F, 29% humidity, 93 octane.

How the **** did I lose 2whp? My AFR drops like a rock. Seriously, 10:1 AFR on an N/A car?!?!

Help...
Old 01-10-2010 | 12:11 AM
  #2  
Edubs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-01-06
Posts: 4,976
Likes: 2
From: West Coast, FL
Why are you running 93 octane? That's your problem right there. No need for it and you won't gain a thing w/o tuning for it. Also, don't even compare dyno runs from separate months. If you want to do a comparison to see how much power a mod makes, do a base run and then install the mod and dyno again that very same day.

There is nothing to compare at this point. There are so many variables it's not even funny...
Old 01-10-2010 | 12:14 AM
  #3  
2008G5GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 09-10-08
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC
Originally Posted by Edubs
Why are you running 93 octane? That's your problem right there. No need for it and you won't gain a thing w/o tuning for it. Also, don't even compare dyno runs from separate months. If you want to do a comparison to see how much power a mod makes, do a base run and then install the mod that very same day.

There is nothing to compare at this point.
From what everyone says, 91 or higher is best for the 2.4L.

There was a base XFE there that put down 145whp. Same AFRs though.

That's what's concerning me. That's really low.
Old 01-10-2010 | 12:29 AM
  #4  
OriGinaL Condo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-27-08
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Linden, New Jersey
Originally Posted by 2008G5GT
From what everyone says, 91 or higher is best for the 2.4L.

There was a base XFE there that put down 145whp. Same AFRs though.

That's what's concerning me. That's really low.
91 is fine but I wouldn't run 93 unless you were boosted or tuned for it. As far as numbers go, there are a ridiculous number of variables involved here so don't sweat it. You won't gain much from just an intake anyway so the numbers should be right around stock regardless.
Old 01-10-2010 | 12:31 AM
  #5  
Edubs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-01-06
Posts: 4,976
Likes: 2
From: West Coast, FL
91 is what the vehicle is recommended to run from the factory, iirc. Use that, and don't bother w/ 93 unless you are going to tune for it as there is no reason for it. Post up a pic of your full stock dyno sheet. What was the AFR on that?
Old 01-10-2010 | 12:36 AM
  #6  
silver187666's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-25-08
Posts: 7,155
Likes: 0
From: Yulee, Florida
im sorry but, with the way cars need to be tuned now, dosent the adding of that much more air need to be added in a tune.

and yah dont waste money on the high octane enless your boosted
Old 01-10-2010 | 01:28 AM
  #7  
kevinj4891's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-12-08
Posts: 989
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, CA
from dynoing my car, i think 2.4's run really rich. thats why tuning gives it so much of a difference. plus, it may be like the headers i put on.... it may decrease the low end HP, but raise torque, which is better
Old 01-10-2010 | 03:18 AM
  #8  
NewLS22's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-12-07
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
send your dyno sheet to k&n. It would be interesting to know what they have to say considering all their products are "dyno tested"
Old 01-10-2010 | 03:21 AM
  #9  
OriGinaL Condo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-27-08
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Linden, New Jersey
Originally Posted by silver187666
im sorry but, with the way cars need to be tuned now, dosent the adding of that much more air need to be added in a tune.
That much more air? He added an intake...that is almost nothing by itself

Originally Posted by NewLS22
send your dyno sheet to k&n. It would be interesting to know what they have to say considering all their products are "dyno tested"
They won't give 2 *****. The dyno conditions have way too many variables to be even considered. Like someone earlier said, if you're going to do a comparison dyno you gotta get on a dyno, install, get back on.
Old 01-10-2010 | 04:12 AM
  #10  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
The temp differences alone are enough.
Muchless the different fuel.

hell the dyno operator could of just strapped your car down tighter

Too many variables. If it still feels faster then theres a good chance it is.



I have an 08 sport 2.4L auto which is the same as your car and trust me back to back with my families stock 2.4L auto theres a good difference in performance.

Me:
91-93 (depending on whats available) jet stage 2 chip (requires premium) and the Injen CAI (being ran as an SRI)
Family
Stock on 89 octane.

So I mean there should be a difference but theirs feels so lifeless after 50-60mph its not even funny. And theirs was faster than mine when we both had them stock on 87 (what the dealer filled us up with)


Also a few other things to think about. Your an auto. that xfe is a 5 spd which has less drivetrain loss. Also a stock 08 5spd will put down about 155-160hp. Automatics have higher drivetrain loss.
Just some food for thought.
Old 01-10-2010 | 11:58 AM
  #11  
2008G5GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 09-10-08
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC
I'm perfectly aware of the parasitic loss of an automatic transmission.

I'm pissed off because, it seems like I've wasted $300.

The colder weather, theoretically, should help the numbers.

I'm dropping back to 87 octane. Hopefully that will help to lean it out a bit.
Old 01-10-2010 | 03:43 PM
  #12  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
For one we are in WINTER GAS now.... which will drop all performance.

2ndly you won't get a full gain out of those without getting a tune with it.

I would imagine most of the drop is due to the **** gas we have now
Old 01-10-2010 | 03:54 PM
  #13  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC
For one we are in WINTER GAS now.... which will drop all performance.

2ndly you won't get a full gain out of those without getting a tune with it.

I would imagine most of the drop is due to the **** gas we have now
This man has another point. Winter gas will produce lower horsepower #'s. My gas mileage does also fall off during the winter.

So I wouldnt say you wasted money on the intake. On the dyno yeah.
Old 01-10-2010 | 03:55 PM
  #14  
riko540's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-08
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 1
From: South Jersey
There are too many variable like everyone is saying. Around here its hard to find 91 Octane. All the gas stations here have 87(regular), 89(plus), or 93(premium). Some of the gas stations sell 91 but I'm not going to hunt around for it
Old 01-10-2010 | 03:59 PM
  #15  
glen229's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 06-20-08
Posts: 6,173
Likes: 1
From: S. Easton, Ma
retune
Old 01-10-2010 | 04:01 PM
  #16  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by riko540
There are too many variable like everyone is saying. Around here its hard to find 91 Octane. All the gas stations here have 87(regular), 89(plus), or 93(premium). Some of the gas stations sell 91 but I'm not going to hunt around for it
thats amusing you have to hunt some for 93 around here

I end up running 93 but the jet module calls for premium anyway and the 91 stations are actually further away oddly enough but the car still feels a bit peppier on 91 than 93.
Old 01-10-2010 | 04:26 PM
  #17  
2008G5GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 09-10-08
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC
Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC
For one we are in WINTER GAS now.... which will drop all performance.

2ndly you won't get a full gain out of those without getting a tune with it.

I would imagine most of the drop is due to the **** gas we have now
I never even thought of that.

The only thing that hurt more yesterday, was the bone stock XFE putting down 143whp.

You're a tuner, what would you recommend tune wise? I need something stealth.
Old 01-10-2010 | 04:36 PM
  #18  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by 2008G5GT
I never even thought of that.

The only thing that hurt more yesterday, was the bone stock XFE putting down 143whp.

You're a tuner, what would you recommend tune wise? I need something stealth.
Not many options for 08s.

LS2Edit
Trifecta
or Jet
Old 01-10-2010 | 04:38 PM
  #19  
2008G5GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 09-10-08
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC
Originally Posted by CordiaDOHC
Not many options for 08s.

LS2Edit
Trifecta
or Jet
What about HPTuners?
Old 01-10-2010 | 04:38 PM
  #20  
blackbolt89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-28-08
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
From: New Milford, NJ
its the winter gas mix and the difference in time as other gurus have said.

also how did you guys manage to get a dyno run with an auto to go down accurately?
Old 01-10-2010 | 04:40 PM
  #21  
2008G5GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 09-10-08
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC
Originally Posted by blackbolt89
its the winter gas mix and the difference in time as other gurus have said.

also how did you guys manage to get a dyno run with an auto to go down accurately?
Just got it into 3rd and feathered into it.
Old 01-10-2010 | 04:46 PM
  #22  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by 2008G5GT
What about HPTuners?
No hptuners sadly.... Trust me I would been long since tuned if that was the case I got a great deal on the jet modules and went with them. they are better than nothing but thats about it.
Old 01-10-2010 | 06:21 PM
  #23  
2008G5GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 09-10-08
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC
Wouldn't I have been on winter gas back in November?
Old 01-10-2010 | 06:23 PM
  #24  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by 2008G5GT
Wouldn't I have been on winter gas back in November?
maybe maybe not. All depends on the station and area. Hell for that matter you couldve gotten a bad batch of gas or couldve gotten gas from a different station. Just too many variables.
Old 01-10-2010 | 07:10 PM
  #25  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
I wish I could tune you... unfortunately I can't.

Trifecta prolly your best bet. But you need to look at the other variables.


Quick Reply: Installed a K&N intake, and LOST 2whp...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 AM.