2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

Running 91 octane instead of 87

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2012 | 01:44 AM
  #1  
mrp0pp3r's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-27-12
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Running 91 octane instead of 87

I have a 2.4L engine and i just recently found out that the engine is recommended to run on 91 octane. I was just wondering if i switch to 91 from now on will it help my engine? i have 50,000km currently on my car.
Old 07-16-2012 | 01:47 AM
  #2  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,935
Likes: 93
From: Texas
I switched from 87 to 93 and I didn't gain anything. Lost mileage. I'm switching back to 87. If ur not having any issues using 87 then ur fine
Old 07-16-2012 | 02:01 AM
  #3  
Twoozofjuice's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 12-19-11
Posts: 8,105
Likes: 4
From: Pharr
go 91 or 93 imo. car felt better and got better mileage with it
Old 07-16-2012 | 02:28 AM
  #4  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,935
Likes: 93
From: Texas
Oh shut up Abraham jk
Old 07-16-2012 | 02:31 AM
  #5  
Twoozofjuice's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 12-19-11
Posts: 8,105
Likes: 4
From: Pharr
Originally Posted by chevygirl2006
Oh shut up Abraham jk
that stuffs condifential wtf! cant be saying my name everywhere
Old 07-16-2012 | 02:35 AM
  #6  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,935
Likes: 93
From: Texas
Omg
Old 07-16-2012 | 03:00 AM
  #7  
mtbrent's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-11-07
Posts: 568
Likes: 1
From: Albany, NY
More octane, more resistance to detonation. More resistance to detonation, more timing advanced by ecu. More timing advance , more power and better mpg. Run 91+!
Old 07-16-2012 | 03:03 AM
  #8  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,935
Likes: 93
From: Texas
My mpg went down

And I don't think it will make a big difference in power on a n/a cobalt.

Last edited by chevygirl2006; 07-16-2012 at 03:03 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 07-16-2012 | 03:08 AM
  #9  
mtbrent's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-11-07
Posts: 568
Likes: 1
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by chevygirl2006
My mpg went down

And I don't think it will make a big difference in power on a n/a cobalt.
Big no, noticeable yes. If you have a car that will adjust timing automatically to take advantage of higher octane, an octane it was designed to run on, there were other outside influences that made your mpg go down when you switched.
Old 07-16-2012 | 03:11 AM
  #10  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,935
Likes: 93
From: Texas
Well I'm switching back to 87. It ran great and got better mileage. I got like 26mpg city on 87 and now it's at 21mpg on 93.
Old 07-16-2012 | 03:23 AM
  #11  
mtbrent's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-11-07
Posts: 568
Likes: 1
From: Albany, NY
According to your sig, you have a tune. Your results are null, tune changes everything. Could be tuned for the lower octane for all we know
Old 07-16-2012 | 03:28 AM
  #12  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,935
Likes: 93
From: Texas
No I was specifically got retuned for 93 gas
Old 07-16-2012 | 03:32 AM
  #13  
mtbrent's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-11-07
Posts: 568
Likes: 1
From: Albany, NY
May want to have that tune redone, lol
Old 07-16-2012 | 03:33 AM
  #14  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,935
Likes: 93
From: Texas
That's what I plan on doing. Cuz now my car is running bad
Old 07-16-2012 | 06:38 AM
  #15  
jp1600's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 05-18-12
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
91 octane, there is a reason it costs more, because its better, realistically I can't believe this is a question, and even more so I can't believe people would say no
Old 07-16-2012 | 08:33 AM
  #16  
Gelladuga69's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-11
Posts: 6,904
Likes: 0
From: YAMOMS
I get 26mpg City on 93 on my LSJ.
Old 07-16-2012 | 08:33 AM
  #17  
noorj's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: 09-03-10
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: motor city
Originally Posted by mtbrent
More octane, more resistance to detonation. More resistance to detonation, more timing advanced by ecu. More timing advance , more power and better mpg. Run 91+!
This
Old 07-16-2012 | 08:59 AM
  #18  
RoadconeTuning's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-10-10
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 2
From: Upstate, SC
my dads solstice has the 2.4 and anything less than 91 gets 100% miserable gas mileage... like a 30% hit... and it drives like hell...
Old 07-16-2012 | 09:12 AM
  #19  
hhrfreek's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 07-24-11
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 2
From: WI
I data logged with hpt a while back to see what the difference would be for higher and lower octanes. Your pcm will pull timing all day if you run 87. I was getting bumped down to the low octane table a lot. Any medium to high loads and the pcm picked up kr every time. That was half a tank of 87. Then I topped it off with 93 and got ZERO KR. And that was obviously not even full on 93. Anyone who thinks their car runs better on 87 is a tool bag.

FWIW the low octane table is about 10 degrees of timing loss in some areas and more than 5 at wot...so yes it does make a noticeable difference.

Its going to take a couple fill ups before the octane is all the way up to what you want it at as well since the couple gallons of 87 you have left will bump the octane down a bit so that could be part of the reason its hard to tell on the first fill up.
Old 07-16-2012 | 09:23 AM
  #20  
turbosmart4's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 12,277
Likes: 1
From: Alaska
93 ftw!
Old 07-16-2012 | 10:22 AM
  #21  
mrp0pp3r's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-27-12
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
I will start running 91 now, should i disconnect my battery to let the computer adjust for 91?
Old 07-16-2012 | 10:32 AM
  #22  
hhrfreek's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 07-24-11
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 2
From: WI
No. The computer will not sense any further kr and will start using the high octane table automatically.
Old 07-16-2012 | 01:24 PM
  #23  
Mindrot's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-16-09
Posts: 3,207
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Originally Posted by mtbrent
More octane, more resistance to detonation. More resistance to detonation, more timing advanced by ecu. More timing advance , more power and better mpg. Run 91+!
That
Old 07-16-2012 | 01:30 PM
  #24  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,935
Likes: 93
From: Texas
The only reason I want to switch back to 87 is because my mpg went down a lot. And my car is messing up. Ever since I got tuned for 93 the car runs bad now.
Old 07-16-2012 | 01:32 PM
  #25  
Gelladuga69's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-11
Posts: 6,904
Likes: 0
From: YAMOMS
How many tanks of 93 did you go through?


Quick Reply: Running 91 octane instead of 87



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 AM.