2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

SS/NA: is 172.680 mph adequate?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2006 | 03:08 PM
  #1  
LewiSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-17-06
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
From: Denver Metro
SS/NA: is 172.680 mph adequate?

Check it out:

http://www.seriouswheels.com/top-200...Salt-Flats.htm

A new record: 156.073 mph on E85, 172.680 mph with nitrous added. WITHOUT turbo- or super-charging. And with "only" a 2.0!

So, should we be able to get the 2.4 NA to run? Maybe if we had the 3 college girls that built this car we could!

In the pics, the SS/NA is the G/FCC car with the corn paint job (for the E85 bio-fuel it ran on).
Old 09-06-2006 | 04:58 PM
  #2  
sushidog's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-09-06
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
From: Abita Springs, Louisiana
Did you notice the 4 hoodpins on a 156mph vehicle?

I guess they didn't want their hood to come up.
Old 09-06-2006 | 05:45 PM
  #3  
savior's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-06
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
tell you what... if you build it... ill drive it
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RaginChopsuey
War Stories
16
10-27-2015 01:27 PM
InfraRedline
Drag Racing
35
09-29-2015 02:09 PM
dieGone
Complete Cars
4
09-23-2015 10:20 AM
Builttss
War Stories
5
09-22-2015 12:42 AM



Quick Reply: SS/NA: is 172.680 mph adequate?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:36 AM.