2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

To turbo or not to turbo...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2013 | 10:57 PM
  #26  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,935
Likes: 93
From: Texas
Ya I just read on a few different websites that the pistons and rods are forged on the 2006 models and early 2007 models. The 2008 models are a lot weaker.
Old 08-03-2013 | 10:58 PM
  #27  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,935
Likes: 93
From: Texas
Zzp even says it.
Old 08-03-2013 | 10:59 PM
  #28  
Spawne32's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-24-08
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Found this with a quick search, LNF seems to have a rod limit of about 400.

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/5328471-post22.html

Originally Posted by chevygirl2006
Zzp even says it.
Link?

Last edited by Spawne32; 08-03-2013 at 10:59 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 08-03-2013 | 11:01 PM
  #29  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,935
Likes: 93
From: Texas
It says it when you click in the zzp 2.2/2.4 turbo kit.
Old 08-03-2013 | 11:03 PM
  #30  
Spawne32's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-24-08
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
found this in another forum post

2006-2007: 12596088 A 2.4-B/P (LE5), (1ST DES) ROD, CONN (FORGED STEEL W/ROUNDED EDGES ON CAP AND MFG TRIM MARK AROUND OUTER PERIMETER) (FOR 2ND DES SEE 12611360)

2008+ 12598216 A 2.4-B/P (LE5), (2ND DES) ROD, CONN (POWDER METAL W/SMOOTH SURFACE CAP AND SINGLE RIDGE ACROSS CAP, W/O MFG TRIM MARK AROUND OUTER PERIMETER) (FOR 1ST DES SEE 12596088)

dunno where he got the description from, dont have a GM parts catalog in front of me
Old 08-03-2013 | 11:03 PM
  #31  
nhanson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 6,428
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota
They took a stock valve springed LE5 to over 400whp.
Old 08-03-2013 | 11:06 PM
  #32  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,935
Likes: 93
From: Texas
Well there your answer. They are forged so that means they are stronger than the newer model 2.4. Zzp says that...08+ 2.2 and 2.4 have weaker rods and we do not recommend going passed 260whp with stock internals.
Old 08-03-2013 | 11:07 PM
  #33  
Spawne32's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-24-08
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
heres what i was looking for!

GM Media Online: English

GM Media Online: English
Old 08-03-2013 | 11:14 PM
  #34  
Spawne32's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-24-08
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
The 2.4L (2008) VVT uses forged C70 steel connecting rods that are shorter than those in the 2.2L with a stroked cast nodular iron crankshaft.

So apparently both use forged rods, perhaps the rods are just smaller then on the newer models since the 08+ were supposed to be lighter.
Old 08-03-2013 | 11:33 PM
  #35  
Spawne32's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-24-08
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Actually alot of good reads about all the parts on there, including the 4T45E and how its been improved over the original 4T40E i had in my cavalier. lol
Old 08-03-2013 | 11:38 PM
  #36  
ranviper's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 01-02-13
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: NY


Either way I'll upgrade my internals for the turbo. Better safe than sorry I suppose.
Old 08-03-2013 | 11:40 PM
  #37  
chevygirl2006's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 10,935
Likes: 93
From: Texas
The 2008 2.4 is weaker. That's all that needs to be known lol. It can't handle as much power as the earlier models.

Originally Posted by ranviper


Either way I'll upgrade my internals for the turbo. Better safe than sorry I suppose.
True. You will have to if you want over 300whp.

Last edited by chevygirl2006; 08-03-2013 at 11:40 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 08-03-2013 | 11:44 PM
  #38  
Spawne32's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-24-08
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
I thought he has a 06 though.
Old 08-04-2013 | 12:19 AM
  #39  
noorj's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: 09-03-10
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: motor city
you don't need internals for a reliable 300 whp


and no 08+ uses powdered metal rods NOT forged rods
Old 08-04-2013 | 12:34 AM
  #40  
Jacob4ta's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-09-13
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: Antelope Valley, CA
Shoot I'm going SC in a couple weeks for my LE5. I got everything lined up and I'm pumped to get it running.

I haven't even thought about internals, or clutch or any of that yet. Just excited to be able to make it up steep hills with cruise control on haha.
Old 08-04-2013 | 07:57 AM
  #41  
noorj's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: 09-03-10
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: motor city
Originally Posted by Jacob4ta
Shoot I'm going SC in a couple weeks for my LE5. I got everything lined up and I'm pumped to get it running.

I haven't even thought about internals, or clutch or any of that yet. Just excited to be able to make it up steep hills with cruise control on haha.
You won't need internals, IDK where this all this misinformation came from. But you should def start looking at a clutch lol, my stocker **** the bed while I was still NA but I think it was from all the autox.

I love my KY stage 3 I have in now but the KY stage 1 I had before was also a really good clutch
Old 08-04-2013 | 08:11 AM
  #42  
ranviper's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 01-02-13
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: NY
What about my clutch? Anyone know what the stock is rated for?
Old 08-04-2013 | 08:25 AM
  #43  
noorj's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: 09-03-10
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: motor city
They're all different because it depends on how good/bad it has been treated. I beat the **** out of mine so it started slipping fully bolted+tuned after a few thousand miles. Some people have SC'ed and made low 200's whp on the stock clutch, after some time though it will slip
Old 08-04-2013 | 08:36 AM
  #44  
ranviper's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 01-02-13
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by noorjariri
They're all different because it depends on how good/bad it has been treated. I beat the **** out of mine so it started slipping fully bolted+tuned after a few thousand miles. Some people have SC'ed and made low 200's whp on the stock clutch, after some time though it will slip
Figured at much. I'll probably upgrade that before I even get the kit anyways. I'm thinking Stage 3

ZZPerformance - South Bend Stage Clutches #SB-STGCL

Any recommendations?
Old 08-04-2013 | 08:50 AM
  #45  
noorj's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: 09-03-10
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: motor city
I really like KY, there customer service is great and their clutches are quality. I know a guy that had the ZZP/southbend stage 3 on his SC'd HHR, he liked it a lot more than his exedy setup.
Old 08-06-2013 | 08:06 AM
  #46  
ranviper's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 01-02-13
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: NY
QQ - How does this kit compare to the zzp supercharge kit for the 2.4, and what kind of power per $ so to speak can you get out of it compared to the turbo kit?
Old 08-06-2013 | 08:17 AM
  #47  
noorj's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: 09-03-10
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: motor city
you mean how does the zzp turbo compare to the zzp sc kit?

turbo will get you more power, way easier. it does cost more money though, but ZZP's sc kit is way overpriced. you can piece together an sc kit for $1500 easily and there are plenty of write-ups/instructions on how to do it. getting a lot of power with the SC would cost a lot more, where with the turbo you turn up the boost (assuming tune+injectors are good for it) and make more power.

really depends on the kind of power you want to make, and what the car's used for. remember though with more power comes decreased reliability
Old 08-06-2013 | 10:20 AM
  #48  
i944scania's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-21-11
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
Originally Posted by noorjariri
you mean how does the zzp turbo compare to the zzp sc kit?

turbo will get you more power, way easier. it does cost more money though, but ZZP's sc kit is way overpriced. you can piece together an sc kit for $1500 easily and there are plenty of write-ups/instructions on how to do it. getting a lot of power with the SC would cost a lot more, where with the turbo you turn up the boost (assuming tune+injectors are good for it) and make more power.

really depends on the kind of power you want to make, and what the car's used for. remember though with more power comes decreased reliability
agreed, but turbos have boost limitation too depending on specs
Old 08-06-2013 | 12:18 PM
  #49  
noorj's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: 09-03-10
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: motor city
Originally Posted by i944scania
agreed, but turbos have boost limitation too depending on specs
I was speaking solely in reference to our application. These motors can really only handle about 15psi max in stock form, and no turbo has a surge line that low. ZZP's kit starts at 7-8 psi and can easily be turned up from there.

And where these motors sit on any compressor map, boost=power
Old 08-06-2013 | 11:15 PM
  #50  
ranviper's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 01-02-13
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: NY
Well, it's my daily driver, about 40 miles to work and another 40 back (yeah I know...ugh) - so I want reliability, but I also don't wanna sink 6-7k into it, because with 6 or 7k I'd be making a down payment on an evo IIX. lol. But, I can see 3.5k or even 4k to get some boost behind the pedals, cuz as much as I love my car, we all know the na just isn't fast. lol.

I want reliable, relatively inexpensive, boosted fun for my daily driver.


Quick Reply: To turbo or not to turbo...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 AM.