2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

Turbo Ready? 2.4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2006 | 09:57 PM
  #1  
kadumel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 03-31-06
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Turbo Ready? 2.4

Ok, with the June release of the Turbo expected, I am going to get my car ready.

Plans for orders include the following...

Engine, Tranny mounts / bushings.
Spec 2 Clutch - This may not be a correct name for it...
Intercooler cry02 spray...

What else can you guys offer as advice? I run a 2.4 with only intake and minor look mods...
Old 04-21-2006 | 10:27 PM
  #2  
Dragonsfire12345's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio,TX
I'm thinking just saving up and getting the turbo set up from Hahns, racing flywheel, racing torque converter, possibly the racing intake manifold from GM. My friend who has been turboing ecotec's ever since they came out said for a better response to get the racing flywheel and torque converter.
Old 04-21-2006 | 10:36 PM
  #3  
kadumel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 03-31-06
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by Dragonsfire12345
I'm thinking just saving up and getting the turbo set up from Hahns, racing flywheel, racing torque converter, possibly the racing intake manifold from GM. My friend who has been turboing ecotec's ever since they came out said for a better response to get the racing flywheel and torque converter.
I heard the aluminum flywheels are cheap tho... Should we buy like 2 of them to have one backup?
Old 04-21-2006 | 10:46 PM
  #4  
Cams's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-23-06
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
I wouldnt say that they are cheap. They are just lighter and free up power. Also you get inserts for them that wear out because aluminum is not as strong as steel or iron. The only problem I have ever had with an aluminum flywheel is that its easier to stall the car. I doubt your gonna break it. Especially with a 2.4 in front of it.
Old 04-21-2006 | 11:28 PM
  #5  
kadumel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 03-31-06
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by Cams
I wouldnt say that they are cheap. They are just lighter and free up power. Also you get inserts for them that wear out because aluminum is not as strong as steel or iron. The only problem I have ever had with an aluminum flywheel is that its easier to stall the car. I doubt your gonna break it. Especially with a 2.4 in front of it.
Hmm break it I am not sure of. I am stil in the learning process I am just posting my feelings on it. someone else pitch inplease let me know
Old 04-21-2006 | 11:51 PM
  #6  
ablankforthemix's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-22-06
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, Wa
i havent found any upgrades for the tranny under hte 2.4l, maybe im not looking hard enough but i plan to beef the crap out of my tranny before any sort of engine stuff... i wanna stage three clutch kit... i mean go big or go home eh? and another thing, with the turbo, why would you get a whole new engine?
Old 04-22-2006 | 12:28 AM
  #7  
Red2.4SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-06
Posts: 16,982
Likes: 0
From: SK
No need for new engine if done right, just can't run a lot of boost >8psi
I already have a turbo on my 2.4L Ecotec. Running 6-7psi. Still working out a few small bugs. But should be safe to run at that level without damage. I think that is about where the kit turbos will be set at when they come out.

As for the light weight flywheel, I never liked the one I had on my Sunfire. The engine reved faster, but it lost noticable torque. I could no longer climb hills in 5th that I used to be able to.
Old 04-22-2006 | 12:31 AM
  #8  
kadumel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 03-31-06
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by Red2.4SS
No need for new engine if done right, just can't run a lot of boost >8psi
I already have a turbo on my 2.4L Ecotec. Running 6-7psi. Still working out a few small bugs. But should be safe to run at that level without damage. I think that is about where the kit turbos will be set at when they come out.

As for the light weight flywheel, I never liked the one I had on my Sunfire. The engine reved faster, but it lost noticable torque. I could no longer climb hills in 5th that I used to be able to.
Can I see pics of your turbo? I would really appreciate this...
Old 04-22-2006 | 12:34 AM
  #9  
Beck's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 03-17-06
Posts: 5,170
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area, Cali
Originally Posted by Red2.4SS
No need for new engine if done right, just can't run a lot of boost >8psi
I already have a turbo on my 2.4L Ecotec. Running 6-7psi. Still working out a few small bugs. But should be safe to run at that level without damage. I think that is about where the kit turbos will be set at when they come out.

As for the light weight flywheel, I never liked the one I had on my Sunfire. The engine reved faster, but it lost noticable torque. I could no longer climb hills in 5th that I used to be able to.
you turbo'd your 2.4 and havnt given us any pics or updats!?!!? **** DA ****
Old 04-22-2006 | 12:35 AM
  #10  
elmstreet's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-07-06
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, Texas
yea.. thats pretty shitty.. lol jk
Old 04-22-2006 | 12:41 AM
  #11  
Red2.4SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-06
Posts: 16,982
Likes: 0
From: SK
Well I wanted to see if it would work first. I think its about dialed in now. Very happy with the power and if I keep my foot off the pedal it get good gas milage too.

Only problem is if I really get on it hard for an extended period it goes into Power Reduction Mode. Need some colder plugs or something. I will try and take some pics tomorrow.
Old 04-22-2006 | 12:42 AM
  #12  
Beck's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 03-17-06
Posts: 5,170
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area, Cali
Originally Posted by elmstreet
yea.. thats pretty shitty.. lol jk

NOT j/k lol... im damn serious
Old 04-22-2006 | 12:53 AM
  #13  
Red2.4SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-06
Posts: 16,982
Likes: 0
From: SK
Don't worry, I'll take some pics tomorrow and post them.
Old 04-22-2006 | 05:27 AM
  #14  
Brandon97Z's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-13-04
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
not some ALOT of pics and info
Old 04-22-2006 | 08:37 AM
  #15  
snowbred's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-10-05
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
From: Hackensack, NJ
need some pics man... the 2.4 doesnt need to be running so much boost to be fast 6-7 psi should be more than enough to get you running low low 14s possibly high 13s.
Old 04-22-2006 | 10:01 AM
  #16  
Madwax's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-04-06
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: NH
Is there a link to this turbo kit I have seen people mention? I cannot find it any where, LOL!
Old 04-22-2006 | 10:31 AM
  #17  
Red2.4SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-06
Posts: 16,982
Likes: 0
From: SK
Ok here are some pics of my 2.4L Turbo setup.






More info to follow, have to go to work!
Old 04-22-2006 | 10:33 AM
  #18  
Red2.4SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-06
Posts: 16,982
Likes: 0
From: SK
Ok, well I guess my pictures didn't show up
They are uploaded into the gallery anyway.
How do I post images?
Old 04-22-2006 | 10:51 AM
  #19  
snowbred's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-10-05
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
From: Hackensack, NJ









think thats most of them
Old 04-22-2006 | 10:59 AM
  #20  
RaineMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-02-05
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake, UT
Is it me... or am I not seeing a turbo?
Old 04-22-2006 | 11:01 AM
  #21  
RaineMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-02-05
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake, UT
Oh... and please don't run an aluminum flywheel... like was said before... it makes the engine rev too fast and you do lost speed quickly going uphill. It also makes launching very difficult. Not good for drag racing.
Old 04-22-2006 | 11:33 AM
  #22  
Mercury's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-05
Posts: 4,194
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE
Originally Posted by SilverStreak
Is it me... or am I not seeing a turbo?
Its you because you can see the turbo in every picture....


Nice job on the turbo man!
Old 04-22-2006 | 03:21 PM
  #23  
Dragonsfire12345's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio,TX
so hows the car running with the turbo?
Old 04-22-2006 | 04:41 PM
  #24  
Red2.4SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-06
Posts: 16,982
Likes: 0
From: SK
Thanks snowbred for posting the pics.
Sofar the car is running pretty good with the turbo. Significant increase in power. Later I would like forged pistons so I can turn up the boost to 10psi.
I think I need some colder plugs and maybe and air to air intercooler in addition to the water/methanol injection, because if I punch it for more than a few seconds it goes into "Power Reduction Mode." Also have a check engine light, think its the rear O2 as it wasn't plugged in when I first started it up. Will be getting that checked this week.
Old 04-22-2006 | 04:59 PM
  #25  
kadumel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 03-31-06
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by Red2.4SS
Thanks snowbred for posting the pics.
Sofar the car is running pretty good with the turbo. Significant increase in power. Later I would like forged pistons so I can turn up the boost to 10psi.
I think I need some colder plugs and maybe and air to air intercooler in addition to the water/methanol injection, because if I punch it for more than a few seconds it goes into "Power Reduction Mode." Also have a check engine light, think its the rear O2 as it wasn't plugged in when I first started it up. Will be getting that checked this week.
Total cost? Installation costs? Cost for an intercooler to be later added?


Quick Reply: Turbo Ready? 2.4



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 AM.