VVT Tuning?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: 02-02-05
Posts: 4,147
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
VVT Tuning?
Any idea how we could do this? I was doing tuning and noticed the power goes all the way up till redline and still not dropping....im hoping to shift the power curve earlier and may get same good benefit?
#4
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: 02-02-05
Posts: 4,147
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
hehe im trying hard not to order the turbo kit! such a big dent in my bank account! haha stop tempting me with ur turbo 2.4 . i think if i would go for cams might as well go F/I....but im trying to hold that off as long as possible ...
#8
If you really want to make power its the only way to go. Bolt ons only get you so far, and its not very far! haha
#10
#12
#18
you need someone who understand multidimensional arrays (I think that the 2.4 PCM has a 5-D VE / MAF table). There should be a master 2-D table the identifies cam phaser position - each cell of that 2-D table would reference a 3-D VE map. On the VVT PCms, you have a large number of Ve tables to tune due to the changing VE of the engine.
#23
#24
There are a few important things to consider here.
1. HPT isn't the only tuning software on the block.
2. VVT isn't activated at a specific rpm it's a dynamic system.
3. 99% of the people who have tuning software can't tune VVT and the 1% that can don't know enough yet to do anything.
4. Even when HTP does offer VE and cam phasing control it's going to be a while before it can be fully understood and implemented with any discernible results.
Once the basic load, rpm and temperature limits have been met (on start-up) VVT is engaged and dynamically advancing and retarding both the intake and exhaust cams over a range of +-25 degrees.
There are a lot of factors that go into the cam positioning and it's in no way a simple change over point.
Also as it's been pointed out the controller uses a 2nd order, non-linear, multivariate polynomial to compute Volumetric Efficiency (VE) which in itself is beyond the comprehension of most people. ALL OF that is before the dynamic cam phasing is considered, which directly impacts the way the VE is calculated also.
In street terms "That **** is Wack!"
I suspect that in the short term just sharing phasing profiles between different flavors of ECOTEC vehicles will be possible. Eventually as dyno time permits more aggressive N/A profiles can be established based on custom intake and exhaust manifolds. So that slowly over the next 6 months to a year a few choice tuners will have a grasp of how to make it all work together. Eventually if enough phasing is possible guys with boosted applications will take advantage of extreme advance/retard for wasting off boost or even otto cycle 5 stroke supercharged applications.
One thing I can say for sure the guys with EFILive have a serious jump on the learning curve since both Virtual VE and cam phasing are available. Some of us do have a slight grasp of this stuff, but don't come to me for answers. Unless you have knowledge of SciLab and a degree in mathematics I can't offer any advise worth using yet.
1. HPT isn't the only tuning software on the block.
2. VVT isn't activated at a specific rpm it's a dynamic system.
3. 99% of the people who have tuning software can't tune VVT and the 1% that can don't know enough yet to do anything.
4. Even when HTP does offer VE and cam phasing control it's going to be a while before it can be fully understood and implemented with any discernible results.
Once the basic load, rpm and temperature limits have been met (on start-up) VVT is engaged and dynamically advancing and retarding both the intake and exhaust cams over a range of +-25 degrees.
There are a lot of factors that go into the cam positioning and it's in no way a simple change over point.
Also as it's been pointed out the controller uses a 2nd order, non-linear, multivariate polynomial to compute Volumetric Efficiency (VE) which in itself is beyond the comprehension of most people. ALL OF that is before the dynamic cam phasing is considered, which directly impacts the way the VE is calculated also.
In street terms "That **** is Wack!"
I suspect that in the short term just sharing phasing profiles between different flavors of ECOTEC vehicles will be possible. Eventually as dyno time permits more aggressive N/A profiles can be established based on custom intake and exhaust manifolds. So that slowly over the next 6 months to a year a few choice tuners will have a grasp of how to make it all work together. Eventually if enough phasing is possible guys with boosted applications will take advantage of extreme advance/retard for wasting off boost or even otto cycle 5 stroke supercharged applications.
One thing I can say for sure the guys with EFILive have a serious jump on the learning curve since both Virtual VE and cam phasing are available. Some of us do have a slight grasp of this stuff, but don't come to me for answers. Unless you have knowledge of SciLab and a degree in mathematics I can't offer any advise worth using yet.
#25
There are a few important things to consider here.
1. HPT isn't the only tuning software on the block.
2. VVT isn't activated at a specific rpm it's a dynamic system.
3. 99% of the people who have tuning software can't tune VVT and the 1% that can don't know enough yet to do anything.
4. Even when HTP does offer VE and cam phasing control it's going to be a while before it can be fully understood and implemented with any discernible results.
Once the basic load, rpm and temperature limits have been met (on start-up) VVT is engaged and dynamically advancing and retarding both the intake and exhaust cams over a range of +-25 degrees.
There are a lot of factors that go into the cam positioning and it's in no way a simple change over point.
Also as it's been pointed out the controller uses a 2nd order, non-linear, multivariate polynomial to compute Volumetric Efficiency (VE) which in itself is beyond the comprehension of most people. ALL OF that is before the dynamic cam phasing is considered, which directly impacts the way the VE is calculated also.
In street terms "That **** is Wack!"
I suspect that in the short term just sharing phasing profiles between different flavors of ECOTEC vehicles will be possible. Eventually as dyno time permits more aggressive N/A profiles can be established based on custom intake and exhaust manifolds. So that slowly over the next 6 months to a year a few choice tuners will have a grasp of how to make it all work together. Eventually if enough phasing is possible guys with boosted applications will take advantage of extreme advance/retard for wasting off boost or even otto cycle 5 stroke supercharged applications.
One thing I can say for sure the guys with EFILive have a serious jump on the learning curve since both Virtual VE and cam phasing are available. Some of us do have a slight grasp of this stuff, but don't come to me for answers. Unless you have knowledge of SciLab and a degree in mathematics I can't offer any advise worth using yet.
1. HPT isn't the only tuning software on the block.
2. VVT isn't activated at a specific rpm it's a dynamic system.
3. 99% of the people who have tuning software can't tune VVT and the 1% that can don't know enough yet to do anything.
4. Even when HTP does offer VE and cam phasing control it's going to be a while before it can be fully understood and implemented with any discernible results.
Once the basic load, rpm and temperature limits have been met (on start-up) VVT is engaged and dynamically advancing and retarding both the intake and exhaust cams over a range of +-25 degrees.
There are a lot of factors that go into the cam positioning and it's in no way a simple change over point.
Also as it's been pointed out the controller uses a 2nd order, non-linear, multivariate polynomial to compute Volumetric Efficiency (VE) which in itself is beyond the comprehension of most people. ALL OF that is before the dynamic cam phasing is considered, which directly impacts the way the VE is calculated also.
In street terms "That **** is Wack!"
I suspect that in the short term just sharing phasing profiles between different flavors of ECOTEC vehicles will be possible. Eventually as dyno time permits more aggressive N/A profiles can be established based on custom intake and exhaust manifolds. So that slowly over the next 6 months to a year a few choice tuners will have a grasp of how to make it all work together. Eventually if enough phasing is possible guys with boosted applications will take advantage of extreme advance/retard for wasting off boost or even otto cycle 5 stroke supercharged applications.
One thing I can say for sure the guys with EFILive have a serious jump on the learning curve since both Virtual VE and cam phasing are available. Some of us do have a slight grasp of this stuff, but don't come to me for answers. Unless you have knowledge of SciLab and a degree in mathematics I can't offer any advise worth using yet.
IF you were to trace the VE of this engine through a normal drive in the country, you would have to wrap your head around the computer monitoring a point in the fifth dimension which gives you simulatnious access to all possible lines (running conditons) in the 4th dimension, which, in turn, would give you access to every cell on every VE table existing in the third dimension AT THE SAME TIME. Yeah...it is a bit if a mindblower