Westers 1/4 mile results
#1
Westers 1/4 mile results
I wasn't keen on posting at all but I will anyhow.
Altitude desnsity was @ 5100 ft--awful night for racing.
Previous best: 16.16@ 87.58 (2.5 sec 60 ft)
New best of 16.06 @ 87.19 (2.4 sec 60 ft) Alt 4872 feet
Although I was down in 1/4 mile mph, my 1/8 mile speed was 0.58 mph faster
Only good thing was a 0.01 r/t followed by a 0.001 r/t damn I am good. (third best rt ever)
I am going to go back one of these weeks when the weather is a little more favouable--300 feet won't really help. But I'll hold out hope anyhow.
The car honestly does feel faster and I did alot of runs but thats all I got.
I think I should head up to Edmonton if I ever want to see 15's
Altitude desnsity was @ 5100 ft--awful night for racing.
Previous best: 16.16@ 87.58 (2.5 sec 60 ft)
New best of 16.06 @ 87.19 (2.4 sec 60 ft) Alt 4872 feet
Although I was down in 1/4 mile mph, my 1/8 mile speed was 0.58 mph faster
Only good thing was a 0.01 r/t followed by a 0.001 r/t damn I am good. (third best rt ever)
I am going to go back one of these weeks when the weather is a little more favouable--300 feet won't really help. But I'll hold out hope anyhow.
The car honestly does feel faster and I did alot of runs but thats all I got.
I think I should head up to Edmonton if I ever want to see 15's
Last edited by avro206; 06-05-2006 at 09:43 PM.
#4
Originally Posted by snowbred
damn dude you should def take a ride somewhere else to run the car... is there anywhere else up there to run at a better altitude?.. nice run regardless.
I could do that and will---but without a baseline time at the new elevation I will not know if it gained anything.
Edmonton and Medicine Hat are both about 2400 ft.
#5
Originally Posted by savior
yeah track times can be unreliable due to altitude and conditions - glad to hear you like it!
very true---and hard to duplicate in a manual trans.
Thats why I'll go back again and give it another try.
#6
since I like to be so exact in things I further examined the time slips.
16.06 on 2.492
16.16 on 2.523
As you can see the 60 ft time is not 0.1 differnce---it is 0.031
So the car is 0.069 faster- (16.16-16.06+ 0.031)-so far..makes me feel a tiny bit better.
Still aother trip back should settle this.
16.06 on 2.492
16.16 on 2.523
As you can see the 60 ft time is not 0.1 differnce---it is 0.031
So the car is 0.069 faster- (16.16-16.06+ 0.031)-so far..makes me feel a tiny bit better.
Still aother trip back should settle this.
#9
Originally Posted by avro206
since I like to be so exact in things I further examined the time slips.
16.06 on 2.492
16.16 on 2.523
As you can see the 60 ft time is not 0.1 differnce---it is 0.031
So the car is 0.069 faster- (16.16-16.06+ 0.031)-so far..makes me feel a tiny bit better.
Still aother trip back should settle this.
16.06 on 2.492
16.16 on 2.523
As you can see the 60 ft time is not 0.1 differnce---it is 0.031
So the car is 0.069 faster- (16.16-16.06+ 0.031)-so far..makes me feel a tiny bit better.
Still aother trip back should settle this.
On the 16.06 run you simply launched it better.
#10
Originally Posted by korax123
What was the temperature on each night??? Between 65-85 degrees there is a huge difference.
19-May Race City
Cobalt 2.4L SS
with INJEN SRI
Air conditions 9pm
Wind E 30 KM/H
Temp 66.2
Humidity 49
Dew point 46.4
Pressure 29.8
density altitude = 4871 feet
Absolute pressure 26.363
Realitve density 86.51
NHRA 4900 ft
Uncorrected Corrected
Best E/T 16.16 0.9393 15.179088
MPH 87.58 1.0647 93.246426
Modular depot 15.14
website 93.09
density altitude= 4872 feet
2-Jun Race City
Cobalt 2.4 SS
w/ Injen SRI+ECM tune
Air conditions 9pm
Wind S 11 KM/H (that would be a head wind)
Temp 68
Humidity 49
Dew point 48.2
Pressure 29.7
Density Altitude = 5109
Absolute Pressure 26.272
Relative Density 85.94
NHRA 5100 ft
Uncorrected Corrected
best E/T 16.06 0.9367 15.043402
MPH 87.19 1.0675 93.075325
Modular Depot
14.99 93.01
density altitude= 5109 feet
#11
Originally Posted by Bandit2941
The quicker 60' time on the quicker run explains the lack of mph, as well as the quicker ET at the finish line. In general, .01 of 60' is worth at least .03 at the top end. So your 60' was .03 better resulting in a tenth difference at the top end (with a little loss in MPH which is normal in a situation like this).
On the 16.06 run you simply launched it better.
On the 16.06 run you simply launched it better.
not sure why your saying the mph is lower on a quicker 60 time? It shouldn't be.
All I was saying is that both 60 ft times were close and not a full tenth at all.
Even if I ran the 2.492 on the 161.6 run it would not have = a 16.06
Rain is called for this friday--so it will have to wait for another test at which point it makes sense to draw a more definte conclusion.
#12
Originally Posted by avro206
not sure why your saying the mph is lower on a quicker 60 time? It shouldn't be.
All I was saying is that both 60 ft times were close and not a full tenth at all.
Even if I ran the 2.492 on the 161.6 run it would not have = a 16.06
Rain is called for this friday--so it will have to wait for another test at which point it makes sense to draw a more definte conclusion.
All I was saying is that both 60 ft times were close and not a full tenth at all.
Even if I ran the 2.492 on the 161.6 run it would not have = a 16.06
Rain is called for this friday--so it will have to wait for another test at which point it makes sense to draw a more definte conclusion.
I'm saying that if you had run the same 60' time on the .16 as you ran on the .06, that .16 would have been an .06, get what I'm saying?? A couple hun on the short time transfers to a lot of gain at the finish line. Also - you said the only way you'd see 15's is to travel to better air - get your launches down to where it 60' where it should and you'll be seeing 15's even in 5000' of air.
I'm hoping to get out to Lebanon Valley Dragway(NY) this weekend to get a couple runs on the Cobalt and see if I can't go a few rounds with it. The density altitude up there this time of year is usually around 2500-3000' and as such I'm expecting the cobalt to run 15.40's or so in that air, maybe better if I can find a sweet spot on the launch.
#13
post your times if you get ot the track. Is your car an auto or 5 speed?
Its all in the launch, I agree.
My best 60 ft is 2.403--I suppose a 2.3 is possible. But there will be a limit somewhere.
Heres the thing---ealier this year I was running 40 psi--I did not know--I'd get mad axle hop--so I launched off idle almost--and got the 2.5 sec 60 ft times.
Now with 25 psi and a little more gas I can get 2.4s--but too much and I am back in 2.5s or worse.
Its all in the launch, I agree.
My best 60 ft is 2.403--I suppose a 2.3 is possible. But there will be a limit somewhere.
Heres the thing---ealier this year I was running 40 psi--I did not know--I'd get mad axle hop--so I launched off idle almost--and got the 2.5 sec 60 ft times.
Now with 25 psi and a little more gas I can get 2.4s--but too much and I am back in 2.5s or worse.
#14
Originally Posted by avro206
post your times if you get ot the track. Is your car an auto or 5 speed?
Its all in the launch, I agree.
My best 60 ft is 2.403--I suppose a 2.3 is possible. But there will be a limit somewhere.
Heres the thing---ealier this year I was running 40 psi--I did not know--I'd get mad axle hop--so I launched off idle almost--and got the 2.5 sec 60 ft times.
Now with 25 psi and a little more gas I can get 2.4s--but too much and I am back in 2.5s or worse.
Its all in the launch, I agree.
My best 60 ft is 2.403--I suppose a 2.3 is possible. But there will be a limit somewhere.
Heres the thing---ealier this year I was running 40 psi--I did not know--I'd get mad axle hop--so I launched off idle almost--and got the 2.5 sec 60 ft times.
Now with 25 psi and a little more gas I can get 2.4s--but too much and I am back in 2.5s or worse.
So you're saying 25 psi in the front tires is the hot setup??
#15
I think 25 psi is good---had no real problem with axle hop (took most of that away)--if I launcehd to hard...it more or less, just spun
you could drive home on that or stop and fill 'er up.
I used to race with my IROC and did 20 psi--and brought a bike pump ot the track.
you could drive home on that or stop and fill 'er up.
I used to race with my IROC and did 20 psi--and brought a bike pump ot the track.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post