Who has the highest NA 2.4 SS dyno?
#5
#6
#7
#9
#11
Completely off topic but cobaltsslover07.... your picture drives me beserk bro.... seeing the holes from the bowtie are driving me nuts man... tell me you have something to cover that now?
#12
yesir, the balt was under construction in that pic, i ordered the ss emblem and added it on there, also you cant see but i painted the bow tie in the back black!
#13
#14
#15
#16
But the Exige S is where my money is at, and it's not NA.
Also looks like it is running lean for an NA.
Last edited by Psykostevo; 07-06-2007 at 12:34 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#17
#18
My inital dyno was 141whp and 144 ftlbs. So after tune and intake it was 163whp and 155ish ftlbs. It made a HUGE difference!! I can pace stock SS/SCs where as before the tune, I would get DUSTED. Comparig to stock dyno it has points where there's 23whp difference. Different dynos though and different days but still something to consider.
However PM me privately. I have some questions for you.
Not you.... See above.
Last edited by GTP; 07-06-2007 at 12:42 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#20
This was post cat readings stock cat stock exhaust (tailpipe sniffer). And yeah I thought it looked a bit lean too so I pulled the plugs and they are clean and dark grey definitely not white encrusted. Also their tailpipe AF probe left alot to be desired it was basically falling out of the tailpipe.
My inital dyno was 141whp and 144 ftlbs. So after tune and intake it was 163whp and 155ish ftlbs. It made a HUGE difference!! I can pace stock SS/SCs where as before the tune, I would get DUSTED.
Hey PM me privately. I have some questions for you.
Not you.... See above.
My inital dyno was 141whp and 144 ftlbs. So after tune and intake it was 163whp and 155ish ftlbs. It made a HUGE difference!! I can pace stock SS/SCs where as before the tune, I would get DUSTED.
Hey PM me privately. I have some questions for you.
Not you.... See above.
Cool, I'm glad you had a base dyno to compare to. Looks like they did make some improvements. What were your AFR on the stock dyno? and did yougo to the same place for both dyno's?
#21
Ya same place. AFR was still leanish for a stocker (i've seen stock ones are REALLY rich) Mine was almost perfect so I bet it reads lean. I bet its their AF proobe..like I said Old Tech style. I wish I had a DP fitting for sensor... so that's why I pulled the plugs a few times just to inspect.
#22
Lately I have been into tuning the Solstice/Sky 2.4L community. Has given me a lot more 2.4L experience than the cobalts alone could have. I have been tuning for GM Roadster magazine as their staff tuner for a few months now, and they promote and sell my tunes, and we split the money 50/50.
#23
Tune and intake. Problem is Vector locks their tunes so you can't mod for future bolt ons.. You should talk to PsychoStevo I heard good things about his work.
#24
#25
Vector requires you to take the computer out of your car and ship it to them, they then ship you a computer for $400 with a tune on it. You then put it in your car and pray it works. If it does not work, the only way to get it adjusted is to take it out and mail it back to them, and pay them to tune it again (not $400 the second time).
The down side is that you cannot find out what they did to your car, and make simple changes yourself to make it a little better. You also do not know if they disabled DTC's to make it appear that the tune had no issues.
The down side is that you cannot find out what they did to your car, and make simple changes yourself to make it a little better. You also do not know if they disabled DTC's to make it appear that the tune had no issues.