Saskatoon and area random 'blah-blah' thread about junk we like to wammer about...
#1201
I never saw a large improvement if even a noticeable one. I don't drive the car very often my GF does but she agrees. I even played with running my AFR at 15.0. The only way I can see it getting any better is using the Wideband and tuning VE's and MAF of AFR error so that's why i say it would take a lot of time.
If you notice an improvement after Tyler gets everything setup let me know. I'd be willing to do some work for others I just don't want to waste anyone's money by telling them I can do something I'm not confident will happen. Our STFT and LTFT react so fast to fueling changes that I don't know how much it will help.
If you notice an improvement after Tyler gets everything setup let me know. I'd be willing to do some work for others I just don't want to waste anyone's money by telling them I can do something I'm not confident will happen. Our STFT and LTFT react so fast to fueling changes that I don't know how much it will help.
#1202
Saturday afternoon until Sunday afternoon.
I never saw a large improvement if even a noticeable one. I don't drive the car very often my GF does but she agrees. I even played with running my AFR at 15.0. The only way I can see it getting any better is using the Wideband and tuning VE's and MAF of AFR error so that's why i say it would take a lot of time.
If you notice an improvement after Tyler gets everything setup let me know. I'd be willing to do some work for others I just don't want to waste anyone's money by telling them I can do something I'm not confident will happen. Our STFT and LTFT react so fast to fueling changes that I don't know how much it will help.
If you notice an improvement after Tyler gets everything setup let me know. I'd be willing to do some work for others I just don't want to waste anyone's money by telling them I can do something I'm not confident will happen. Our STFT and LTFT react so fast to fueling changes that I don't know how much it will help.
#1203
All your efficiecncy at cruise for mileage is going to come from your timing tables. Already I have made a def. difference in mine, its not rocket science, you just balance timing vs. load and watch a few other parameters to adjust in the pockets you need and voila better mileage, however, your not going to see 10mpg increase while setting the cruise. Typically on cruise and letting it drive for you I feel confident you can gain and easy 3-4 mpg.
My last trip back from edmonton w/ cruise set to 115km/h got me 44.3mpg in a slight (very small) head wind. The car is rated for 41mpg at 100km/h.
My last trip back from edmonton w/ cruise set to 115km/h got me 44.3mpg in a slight (very small) head wind. The car is rated for 41mpg at 100km/h.
#1204
Actually Tyler,
I recall beating up on a stage 2 balt with my stock injectors in pretty good.... hey rippin07
I totally forgot about the timing end of it.... again mr. knowitall has to jump in here. Found max mpg was around 38 to 39 advance. I'll try to get my MPG pid working correctly in HP Tuners so we can actually see a difference in real time.
I recall beating up on a stage 2 balt with my stock injectors in pretty good.... hey rippin07
All your efficiecncy at cruise for mileage is going to come from your timing tables. Already I have made a def. difference in mine, its not rocket science, you just balance timing vs. load and watch a few other parameters to adjust in the pockets you need and voila better mileage, however, your not going to see 10mpg increase while setting the cruise. Typically on cruise and letting it drive for you I feel confident you can gain and easy 3-4 mpg.
My last trip back from edmonton w/ cruise set to 115km/h got me 44.3mpg in a slight (very small) head wind. The car is rated for 41mpg at 100km/h.
My last trip back from edmonton w/ cruise set to 115km/h got me 44.3mpg in a slight (very small) head wind. The car is rated for 41mpg at 100km/h.
Last edited by raptors_67; 09-26-2008 at 02:46 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#1207
Although you did successfully run a stage 2 pulley on stock injectors... I will not risk it with anyone I tune.... just preference. If your pullied, get injectors or GTFO!
YAR!!!!
#1208
#1211
Three factors result in good economy; tuning, driving habits, and rolling resistance.
I haven't fully extended any of the above and I still see 5.6-5.8 L/100km.
My little journey into S'toon this weekend should see a few more improvements on that number.... the last time I tired to set a new personal record, I was at 4.8L/100km from Hafford to North Battleford.
I haven't fully extended any of the above and I still see 5.6-5.8 L/100km.
My little journey into S'toon this weekend should see a few more improvements on that number.... the last time I tired to set a new personal record, I was at 4.8L/100km from Hafford to North Battleford.
#1212
#1214
Three factors result in good economy; tuning, driving habits, and rolling resistance.
I haven't fully extended any of the above and I still see 5.6-5.8 L/100km.
My little journey into S'toon this weekend should see a few more improvements on that number.... the last time I tired to set a new personal record, I was at 4.8L/100km from Hafford to North Battleford.
I haven't fully extended any of the above and I still see 5.6-5.8 L/100km.
My little journey into S'toon this weekend should see a few more improvements on that number.... the last time I tired to set a new personal record, I was at 4.8L/100km from Hafford to North Battleford.
#1215
I average 8.8L/100km with a heavy foot and average highway speed of 125-130. I'm not going to complain. But once the warranty is up, i will likely be looking for a tune.
I have done a "light foot" mode and made 6.7 L/100km on ST II... impressive, but i feel sad driving at 110 and not passing people. And doing the actual posted speed limit everywhere.
On a side note, i increased my recorded top speed to 237kph last weekend. Up from 230. Then i ran into traffic. Its hard to get the right conditions to do a top speed run... I'll get a pic of my GPS when i get home.
I have done a "light foot" mode and made 6.7 L/100km on ST II... impressive, but i feel sad driving at 110 and not passing people. And doing the actual posted speed limit everywhere.
On a side note, i increased my recorded top speed to 237kph last weekend. Up from 230. Then i ran into traffic. Its hard to get the right conditions to do a top speed run... I'll get a pic of my GPS when i get home.
#1216
I average 8.8L/100km with a heavy foot and average highway speed of 125-130. I'm not going to complain. But once the warranty is up, i will likely be looking for a tune.
I have done a "light foot" mode and made 6.7 L/100km on ST II... impressive, but i feel sad driving at 110 and not passing people. And doing the actual posted speed limit everywhere.
On a side note, i increased my recorded top speed to 237kph last weekend. Up from 230. Then i ran into traffic. Its hard to get the right conditions to do a top speed run... I'll get a pic of my GPS when i get home.
I have done a "light foot" mode and made 6.7 L/100km on ST II... impressive, but i feel sad driving at 110 and not passing people. And doing the actual posted speed limit everywhere.
On a side note, i increased my recorded top speed to 237kph last weekend. Up from 230. Then i ran into traffic. Its hard to get the right conditions to do a top speed run... I'll get a pic of my GPS when i get home.
my bro took my car out one day just stole the keys and stole my car he said him and his friend got to 240ish stock hes a retard i was so pissed off when i woke up and my car was gone
you guys should turn on the speed channel cobalt is in 1st place in sport tuner class show called KONI challenge series
__________________
Last edited by stoon_cobalt_colby; 09-27-2008 at 03:34 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#1217
Tyler arent you on 60# injectors??? If you are how the hell are you figuring out your mileage?? not from your DIC because that is no longer correct. If you found a way to make that correct you have to let me know becuase I have playes with mine and nope, its about .5 to .75 liters/100kmh off. I have flow matched 62s with flow rates from -30kpa to +115kpa documented and there is no way I can make the DIC correct due to running out of IFR table.
I have to do the old fashioned filler up and calculate mileage. Let me know if you found a way to make this correct.
OH, Raptors you want a snap back,,,???? sure, You beat a stage 2 car with stock injectors,......
.................................................. .... BUT WHO HAS THEIR ORIGINAL ENGINE???
I have to do the old fashioned filler up and calculate mileage. Let me know if you found a way to make this correct.
OH, Raptors you want a snap back,,,???? sure, You beat a stage 2 car with stock injectors,......
.................................................. .... BUT WHO HAS THEIR ORIGINAL ENGINE???
Last edited by Rippin07; 09-27-2008 at 03:39 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#1219
hahaha i know man but he much old and stronger than me its cool tho now i know what top speed of my car is hahahaha
hahaha i know man but he much old and stronger than me its cool tho now i know what top speed of my car is hahahaha he on oil rigs right now i think i might be goin up there next summer get some mad cash
hahaha i know man but he much old and stronger than me its cool tho now i know what top speed of my car is hahahaha he on oil rigs right now i think i might be goin up there next summer get some mad cash
Last edited by stoon_cobalt_colby; 09-27-2008 at 03:59 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#1224
220km/h
BUT WHO HAS A SHINEY NEW LONGBLOCK MOTOR!!!?? AHA! you know you'll never win.....
Tyler arent you on 60# injectors??? If you are how the hell are you figuring out your mileage?? not from your DIC because that is no longer correct. If you found a way to make that correct you have to let me know becuase I have playes with mine and nope, its about .5 to .75 liters/100kmh off. I have flow matched 62s with flow rates from -30kpa to +115kpa documented and there is no way I can make the DIC correct due to running out of IFR table.
I have to do the old fashioned filler up and calculate mileage. Let me know if you found a way to make this correct.
OH, Raptors you want a snap back,,,???? sure, You beat a stage 2 car with stock injectors,......
.................................................. .... BUT WHO HAS THEIR ORIGINAL ENGINE???
I have to do the old fashioned filler up and calculate mileage. Let me know if you found a way to make this correct.
OH, Raptors you want a snap back,,,???? sure, You beat a stage 2 car with stock injectors,......
.................................................. .... BUT WHO HAS THEIR ORIGINAL ENGINE???
Last edited by raptors_67; 09-27-2008 at 10:55 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost