independent rear suspenstion
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 06-21-07
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 3,308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
independent rear suspenstion
is it possible to do it on a cobalt?
or do they offer a kit?
i dont see why chev wouldnt do it to the cobalt so make better handeling.
or do they offer a kit?
i dont see why chev wouldnt do it to the cobalt so make better handeling.
#2
Senior Member
I don't really understand why they didn't do it either, but oh well. The handling really isn't THAT bad for a torsion beam rear end. No kits are out and there aren't any comparable GM cars that could transplant an independent rear, I know some people who have looked into it before.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: 01-24-06
Location: Warranty Chevrolet, Maryland
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have looked at building an independant rear suspention but after looking at the car and brainstorming the only thing I could come up with would involve basically back halfing the car. Just too much work, especially when the car handles fairly well already.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: everywhere
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
do you know why a irs would be better? is sounds like somebody told you it would handle better(or somebody with a irs was bragging about how much better their car handled than yours?) and you now thinks its a good idea. If your looking for better handling, get the best tires you can afford. It will be cheaper than spending serious cash doing a irs.
#5
Senior Member
do you know why a irs would be better? is sounds like somebody told you it would handle better(or somebody with a irs was bragging about how much better their car handled than yours?) and you now thinks its a good idea. If your looking for better handling, get the best tires you can afford. It will be cheaper than spending serious cash doing a irs.
Daily driving, the difference is negligible and there's really no need for an IRS, especially since the torsion beam setup on the Cobalt is not too bad for a non-independent rear. NOW, for those of us that race our cars and push them to the limit of handling.............yeah, an IRS would be nice and would really benefit the car.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: everywhere
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually, an IRS DOES handle better than most other suspension setups due to each rear wheel being able to interact with the road surface without being influenced by the vertical movement of the other wheel.
Daily driving, the difference is negligible and there's really no need for an IRS, especially since the torsion beam setup on the Cobalt is not too bad for a non-independent rear. NOW, for those of us that race our cars and push them to the limit of handling.............yeah, an IRS would be nice and would really benefit the car.
Daily driving, the difference is negligible and there's really no need for an IRS, especially since the torsion beam setup on the Cobalt is not too bad for a non-independent rear. NOW, for those of us that race our cars and push them to the limit of handling.............yeah, an IRS would be nice and would really benefit the car.
please quote my response of where i said that irs doesn't handle better?
MY POINT(SINCE YOU MISSED IT) WAS THAT TRYING TO FAB UP A IRS FOR THE COBALT WOULD BE A WASTE, GO BUY THE BEST TIRES YOU CAN AFFORD.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-01-06
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was ecstatic when GM decided to keep the torsion beam for the Cobalt. Anybody who works in a shop and sees what kind of problems develop after 60-80k on the IRS of a Focus will know what I'm talking about.
#10
Senior Member
I don't need you to repeat your "point" nor act like I didn't comprehend anything you said. If you want people to get your meaning, try fully expressing yourself fully (i.e. "I'm sure someone's told you it handles better, which it does, but cost vs gain it's not worth it on the Cobalt - tires will compensate.")
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-28-06
Location: United States
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i'd say there is just about a 0.2% chance that someone here could fabricate and properly design an independent rear suspension that would outperform our current setup..
Reason being, you need to know alot of information to decicde on the exact mounting points, what your camber curves should look like, roll center heights, etc.. There's alot more in suspension design than most think..
Reason being, you need to know alot of information to decicde on the exact mounting points, what your camber curves should look like, roll center heights, etc.. There's alot more in suspension design than most think..
#13
The problem with the rear suspesion in the Cobalts is if one tire is on a bump or going around a corner at speed, Camber is working against you. FWD's with good grip love pick up the back inside tire throwing a lot of weight on the outside front tire, which is good. If you really want to make your Cobalt handle a lot better, disconnecting the front sway bar at the track will probably help the most.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-31-07
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
should look into it.... I know like 4 years ago it was unheard of for a cavalier to put IRS in it then one guy took IRS from a grand am and bolted it in. so im thinkin maybe the g6 stuff would work? IMO the twist beam is the better way to stay cause if it was good enough for the time attack cobalt its good enough for 99% of the people on here for what there gonna do with there balts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DANRICKARD
Problems/Service/Maintenance
8
10-01-2015 12:08 AM
Delta coupe
Pictures & Videos
1
09-30-2015 08:11 AM