OFFICIAL DYNO THREAD (take 3)
#302
The HP and T lines would cross at 5252 if they were both scaled the same. If you read the graph closely, you will see that they are both a little over 300 at 5252 RPM. It is a bit odd how they are scaled different and start at different values, but it doesn't change the values. It only changes how the graph appears at first glance.
#304
Are the numbers for the official list supposed to be SAE? ive been seeing alot of people trying to pull off STD numbers.... On a different note, i now understand that because of the different scaling for HP and TQ, that they will not cross at 5252RPM by looking at the lines, but looking at HP and TQ at 5252RPM you can see the values are the same, thanks for clearing that up.
#306
So when i want to brag about numbers on this thread, i should just do observed correction so i have inflated numbers? Im sorry but i like to compare apples to apples. Makes it easy if it was understood that we SAE, STD, etc correct.......
#307
if you know the difference between the 5 correction factors used in dyno testing, it is never a problem. it is a simple math variance between all 5.
which is why, we never bitch about it.
which is why, we never bitch about it.
#308
#309
#315
#317
it just pisses me off that they made such a big deal about me doing the same thing in my quartermile thread. that's all.
486whp, and well over 400wtq as well, which has yet to be accomplished by anyone else other than zzp.
486whp, and well over 400wtq as well, which has yet to be accomplished by anyone else other than zzp.
Last edited by ralliartist; 09-22-2009 at 04:56 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#321
oh I fully understand that is why I called you a trouble maker. But the dyno thread just doesn't get as much action as the 1/4
#323
yes, it's been done by someone else other than zzp.