possible to fit a different 10" in factory pioneer box?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-24-05
Location: mt kisco,ny
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JL 10w1v2.Sounds alot better than the stock sub,and the specs match the stock box perfectly.I had to use like a 1/2" mdf ring for magnet to clear the back of the box.
#27
Senior Member
I'm kindof parcial to the RF's, as I had 2 RF Punch Power DVC's with about 1000 rms each in the old car. But I like the sound of the shallow in the cobalt. It works well for me. (If I wasn't going to run RF I'd be running a JBL though)
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-04-08
Location: Fredericksburg VA
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i hope u guys are sure those subs have enough room........they need a certain amount of space to work at their best...
and why would u put another box on the other side facing the stock box.........you get the boom but the clean bass will cancel out
one more thing........dynamat ur trunks........it will make one hell of a difference and is worth the money.......clean hard hitting bass is where its out and if ur trunks rattling then its not clean lol
and why would u put another box on the other side facing the stock box.........you get the boom but the clean bass will cancel out
one more thing........dynamat ur trunks........it will make one hell of a difference and is worth the money.......clean hard hitting bass is where its out and if ur trunks rattling then its not clean lol
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
yea i am just gonna get rid of the factory box i think. i would like to put something in it, it would be easy, but wont sound good enough for me. i gotta have clean low bass.
#31
Bringing this back from the dead because I have been debating upgrading the sub. I was thinking Alpine Type S shallow mount and Alpine X Power mono amp. I would want to run RCA's to the amp from the head unit. I am contemplating a Kenwood double din with Nav or leaving it stock. If I leave it stock is there an adapter so I can get RCA's from the headunit without having to splice into speaker wire? Does anybody know what size the stock box is?
#33
I wouldn't really call it "in" the factory box, but you get the idea
LICK FOR HIGH RES!
RE-Audio SE-X 10D4 (calls for .65 cu ft optimum enclosure, factory box is .6 so an almost perfect fit). When mounting a sub in the above way make sure to trim 1/4" off the edge of the hole in the stock box. File/sand the edges so they are smooth too.
LICK FOR SOME HIGH RES!
Makes for some SERIOUS thump
It's easiest to use the pair of subwoofer wires to get the audio feed. If your amp doesn't have speaker level inputs (My JL Audio one does) then you'd have to use a Line Output Converter.
Shallow mount subs suck BTW. Look at the Xmax ratings, you want something with at least 15mm for some nice lows
*EDIT: Wow, the Alpine Type R shallow mount has some pretty nice specs (15mm xmax, hehe)! Alpine SWR-T10 (SWRT10) 10" Single 4 ohm Shallow Type-R Subwoofer
The amp you're looking at (MRP-M500?) would only be feeding that sub with 300 watts (single 4 ohm voice coil). It would be better matched to go with a JL 500/1 (can get them used mint for $250 ish around me) because it'll feed that sub an even 500 watts even at 4 ohms . I wasn't able to find the SWR-T10 sub in a 2ohm version, or dual 4ohm, etc. so be careful when matching it to an amp (look at the 4ohm power rating, find something with at least 500 "real"/RMS watts and a regulated power supply). If you wanted to go "cheap" on the amp you can get this one for around $100 and it does about 550 watts RMS at 4ohm, a great mach for that Alpine sub!
-Jamie M.
LICK FOR HIGH RES!
RE-Audio SE-X 10D4 (calls for .65 cu ft optimum enclosure, factory box is .6 so an almost perfect fit). When mounting a sub in the above way make sure to trim 1/4" off the edge of the hole in the stock box. File/sand the edges so they are smooth too.
LICK FOR SOME HIGH RES!
Makes for some SERIOUS thump
It's easiest to use the pair of subwoofer wires to get the audio feed. If your amp doesn't have speaker level inputs (My JL Audio one does) then you'd have to use a Line Output Converter.
Shallow mount subs suck BTW. Look at the Xmax ratings, you want something with at least 15mm for some nice lows
*EDIT: Wow, the Alpine Type R shallow mount has some pretty nice specs (15mm xmax, hehe)! Alpine SWR-T10 (SWRT10) 10" Single 4 ohm Shallow Type-R Subwoofer
The amp you're looking at (MRP-M500?) would only be feeding that sub with 300 watts (single 4 ohm voice coil). It would be better matched to go with a JL 500/1 (can get them used mint for $250 ish around me) because it'll feed that sub an even 500 watts even at 4 ohms . I wasn't able to find the SWR-T10 sub in a 2ohm version, or dual 4ohm, etc. so be careful when matching it to an amp (look at the 4ohm power rating, find something with at least 500 "real"/RMS watts and a regulated power supply). If you wanted to go "cheap" on the amp you can get this one for around $100 and it does about 550 watts RMS at 4ohm, a great mach for that Alpine sub!
-Jamie M.
Last edited by toysareforboys; 02-15-2012 at 11:22 PM.
#34
I am not into crazy loud bass, I listen to mostly rock music, OAR is my favorite band. I like nice crisp punchy bass. I was thinking the Kenwood Excelon KFC-XW1000F subwoofer, Alpine MRX-M50 amplifier which has speaker level inputs so need for the line out converter. I like how the battery is in the trunk so need to run wires up to the headunit! I am trying to keep it small compact and simple.
toysareforboys, Thanks for letting me know the box is .6 cu/ft I have been searching for that for a while now. On a side note I see your sig says you use the Purolator PurOne oil filter, I run the same filter and used to have to buy them on amazon, but recently I found the K-Mart sells them for $7!
Any thoughts or input on what I am thinking about doing would be appreciated
toysareforboys, Thanks for letting me know the box is .6 cu/ft I have been searching for that for a while now. On a side note I see your sig says you use the Purolator PurOne oil filter, I run the same filter and used to have to buy them on amazon, but recently I found the K-Mart sells them for $7!
Any thoughts or input on what I am thinking about doing would be appreciated
#35
That Alpine Type R sub I linked in my previous post, if you read the reviews people say it's a very "punchy" sub and hits hard, not too droony on the low stuff, etc. You wouldn't be disappointed with it I'm sure! That sub you linked is just like the stock sub, other than you'll be feeding it way more power
My RE Audio SEX 10D4 with the 1000 watt amp hits so damn hard, takes the breath out of your lungs and chatters your teeth. It's a long excursion sub so I'm not sure that's what you're looking for, because on low notes it shakes your head so hard it blurs your vision. I've never heard a 10" sub hit low like that one (even 10w7's).
-Jamie M.
Last edited by toysareforboys; 02-16-2012 at 12:19 AM.
#36
Thanks for all that input. That is retarded how GM ran the ground wire. Why should I replace it though and not just clean the body ground to bare metal? I will run the remote turn on wire to the power window fuse. And I think I will go with the Kicker CVT Sub Kicker 10CVT104 Component Car Subwoofers at Onlinecarstereo.com
#37
Thanks for all that input. That is retarded how GM ran the ground wire. Why should I replace it though and not just clean the body ground to bare metal? I will run the remote turn on wire to the power window fuse. And I think I will go with the Kicker CVT Sub Kicker 10CVT104 Component Car Subwoofers at Onlinecarstereo.com
Still thinking about using the same 300watt amp?
GM put the ground wire in there to barely feed everything the CAR needs. When you start adding your amp to the mix, the factory ground wire is insufficient. You can just add on to it (don't need to replace it), just add a 4ga cable from the battery terminal to the factory ground spot, it only needs to be like 1ft long
-Jamie M.
Last edited by toysareforboys; 02-16-2012 at 07:27 PM.
#38
Great price on the Kicker! Nice specs too, 13mm xmax, not bad for shallow mount! Bet it'll sound great! EDIT: Looks like it's designed more for ported enclosures, not sealed? Look at the sealed box requirements: Minimum Sealed Box Volume 0.8 cubic feet, Maximum Sealed Box Volume 3.0 cubic feet. I don't think that'd work very well in the .6 stock box
Still thinking about using the same 300watt amp?
GM put the ground wire in there to barely feed everything the CAR needs. When you start adding your amp to the mix, the factory ground wire is insufficient. You can just add on to it (don't need to replace it), just add a 4ga cable from the battery terminal to the factory ground spot, it only needs to be like 1ft long
-Jamie M.
Still thinking about using the same 300watt amp?
GM put the ground wire in there to barely feed everything the CAR needs. When you start adding your amp to the mix, the factory ground wire is insufficient. You can just add on to it (don't need to replace it), just add a 4ga cable from the battery terminal to the factory ground spot, it only needs to be like 1ft long
-Jamie M.
I was thinking the same thing about the box size being to small. On Kickers website it shows the spec to be .7 cu/ft so I don't think it would be to bad. Do you happen to know the depth of the box so I know what it can or can't fit in it?
The Alpine shallow mount is just to much money. I hear the Pioneer isn't very good. I am thinking to Kenwood probably wont sound very good. The Kicker is looking like the winner now. I heard the Kicker in the back of an Avalanche (not sure the size of the box it was in) but it sounded good. I think the RF P3 might be another one to look at.
#39
What happens if I use the .8ft minimum box voulme?
If the box is too small it will typically result in a boomy system that appears to have strong midbass and less low bass. Typically power-handling is improved though, unless the box is REALLY too small! You can compensate somewhat for a small box volume by adding stuffing to the box. The stuffing can make the box appear up to 40% larger to the driver.
What happens if I use the 3ft maximum box volume?
Typically the low frequency extension of the system improves a little, at the expense of powerhandling. The bass will also sound tighter and "drier", which might not suit your listening tastes.
If the box is too small it will typically result in a boomy system that appears to have strong midbass and less low bass. Typically power-handling is improved though, unless the box is REALLY too small! You can compensate somewhat for a small box volume by adding stuffing to the box. The stuffing can make the box appear up to 40% larger to the driver.
What happens if I use the 3ft maximum box volume?
Typically the low frequency extension of the system improves a little, at the expense of powerhandling. The bass will also sound tighter and "drier", which might not suit your listening tastes.
Yeah, shallow mount are really tricky Why not mount a regular sub inverted like mine? So much better cooling for it and would be easier to find a nice sub for ya
-Jamie M.
#40
Mounting it like yours has come across my mind a few times. Would I still be looking at sealed box specs or is there a different spec if it is inverted? If I went that route what sub would you recommend with that amp?
#41
Not sure what sub to recommend to you. Anything with an xmax around 15mm and an RMS rating of 500watts and a dual 4 ohm voice coil would would be good
For $68 there's this one, 600watts RMS, 13mm xmax, dual 4 ohm. .25 to .75 cu ft
For $50 there's this one, 500 watts RMS, 22mm xmax, dual 4 ohm, .75 cu ft
OMG SUPER NICE! For $80 there's a Clarion sub, 500 watts RMS, 18.5mm xmax, dual 4 ohm, 0.4 to 1.2 ft with .5 recommended
I'll edit this post and paste in more as I find them
-Jamie M.
Last edited by toysareforboys; 02-16-2012 at 10:28 PM.
#42
I want to stick with running it at 4 ohms (I like it to run cool). Here is what I am thinking:
Polk Polk Audio MM1040 Mobile Monitor series 10" 4-ohm subwoofer at Crutchfield.com[rank7]10%22#details-tab
I'm having a hard time finding something that is good in a .6 cu/ft box
Polk Polk Audio MM1040 Mobile Monitor series 10" 4-ohm subwoofer at Crutchfield.com[rank7]10%22#details-tab
I'm having a hard time finding something that is good in a .6 cu/ft box
#43
And actually, you won't believe this, I think that sub will FIT IN THE STOCK COBALT BOX! I mean THE RIGHT WAY! It's mounting depth is 4.5 inches, that's a damn shallow sub! If it didn't quite fit you can get an MDF mount ring that will raise the sub up .5" or .75" to give you the room.
I think you just found your sub
*EDIT: $86 from Amazon!! http://www.amazon.com/Polk-Audio-AA3...9450542&sr=1-3
-Jamie M.
Last edited by toysareforboys; 02-16-2012 at 10:55 PM.
#45
Ohhhh, not bad! 350rms (so fine for the amp's 300 at 4 ohms), xmax of 25mm!! (that thing's gonna thump), sensitivity of 91! (it's going to punch nice!), single 4 ohm voice coil (although the picture does show a dual voice coil!?) Polk Audio MM1040 (MM0-1040) 10" Single 4 ohm Mobile Monitor Sub, .66 cu ft.
And actually, you won't believe this, I think that sub will FIT IN THE STOCK COBALT BOX! I mean THE RIGHT WAY! It's mounting depth is 4.5 inches, that's a damn shallow sub! If it didn't quite fit you can get an MDF mount ring that will raise the sub up .5" or .75" to give you the room.
I think you just found your sub
*EDIT: $86 from Amazon!! http://www.amazon.com/Polk-Audio-AA3...9450542&sr=1-3
-Jamie M.
And actually, you won't believe this, I think that sub will FIT IN THE STOCK COBALT BOX! I mean THE RIGHT WAY! It's mounting depth is 4.5 inches, that's a damn shallow sub! If it didn't quite fit you can get an MDF mount ring that will raise the sub up .5" or .75" to give you the room.
I think you just found your sub
*EDIT: $86 from Amazon!! http://www.amazon.com/Polk-Audio-AA3...9450542&sr=1-3
-Jamie M.
This is what I will be going with! I'll post pictures and let you know how it turns out. Thanks for your help!
#46
If it fits "in" the box without much fuss, I think it'll be "the" sub to recommend to people upgrading their stock one (especially because it comes in a dual 4 ohm for people that like to push the limits ).
-Jamie M.
#47
So basically you're saying don't put ANY descent subs in/on the stock box? lol
The only issue I have with mounting my RE inverted is that it's difficult to take cool excursion videos!!
-Jamie M.
#48
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
ok a shallow sub mounted in the stock box is for someone who wants more then stock but doesnt want to lose space. u get decent sound but dont expect miracles. if u put a regular sub mounted inverted in the stock box u lose ur space anyway so u might as well just do up a new box and get better sound.
i am also pretty confident the tiny ass stock box is the only reason ur sex 10 isnt blown right now
i am also pretty confident the tiny ass stock box is the only reason ur sex 10 isnt blown right now
#49
ok a shallow sub mounted in the stock box is for someone who wants more then stock but doesnt want to lose space. u get decent sound but dont expect miracles. if u put a regular sub mounted inverted in the stock box u lose ur space anyway so u might as well just do up a new box and get better sound.
i am also pretty confident the tiny ass stock box is the only reason ur sex 10 isnt blown right now
i am also pretty confident the tiny ass stock box is the only reason ur sex 10 isnt blown right now
The RE inverted doesn't take up MUCH more room in the trunk, certainly less than a proper box would
(Before the amp upgrade):
LICK FOR HIGH RES!
-Jamie M.
#50
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
right but ur limiting the sub as well. its easier and better overall to put the sub in the proper box so its louder from the get go and u can turn everything down running the sub amp and all components cooler
i mean i get why u did it and cool but not something i would recommend
i mean i get why u did it and cool but not something i would recommend