I need a lawyer
09-13-2011, 12:58 PM
#26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-13-11
Location: Olney, MD
Posts: 8,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i appriciate the help everything. i am going to dealership today. getting an estimate, maybe they can fix it without a new hood, if so he might be able to pay for the damages, but he said he is not buying a hood.
09-13-2011, 08:12 PM
#28
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 07-30-11
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe if you have the original Blackberry pics on the computer you can right click > properties and it should show info there... I coulda swore my old Blackberry Bold had at least the date in there on the pics it took.
09-14-2011, 12:32 AM
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-13-11
Location: Olney, MD
Posts: 8,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
also, my paint has these swirls things on it. when you look at it in the light you can see it, i think the owner who had it before used the wrong towel and might have put small scratches on it. just before another friend and i were talking about it. i can bring him in court and he can say he didnt see any dents on it... right?
i dont want to take him to court, and him found not guilty of the crime...
i took it to the dealer's collision center today.... 750 dollars.... come on.... i really need to win this case
09-14-2011, 10:53 AM
#30
If he is actually a friend tell him to pick you up a hood from the wreckers that is the right colour and it won't cost him much.
If he is just someone you know and not a friend after you win in court take the money and buy a new CF hood and thank him for your new cool hood
As far as im concerned anyone who would do that to your car and not pay for is not a friend in my book. Either that or he is just used to you being his bitch and thinks you will back down.
If he is just someone you know and not a friend after you win in court take the money and buy a new CF hood and thank him for your new cool hood
As far as im concerned anyone who would do that to your car and not pay for is not a friend in my book. Either that or he is just used to you being his bitch and thinks you will back down.
09-14-2011, 11:16 AM
#31
If he is actually a friend tell him to pick you up a hood from the wreckers that is the right colour and it won't cost him much.
If he is just someone you know and not a friend after you win in court take the money and buy a new CF hood and thank him for your new cool hood As far as im concerned anyone who would do that to your car and not pay for is not a friend in my book. Either that or he is just used to you being his bitch and thinks you will back down.
If he is just someone you know and not a friend after you win in court take the money and buy a new CF hood and thank him for your new cool hood
As far as im concerned anyone who would do that to your car and not pay for is not a friend in my book. Either that or he is just used to you being his bitch and thinks you will back down.
09-14-2011, 02:47 PM
#34
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-13-11
Location: Olney, MD
Posts: 8,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and he is not my friend anymore from the lack of respect he is showing me.
also, he attempted to fix it, all he said is he will buy me a dent popper
09-15-2011, 09:51 AM
#35
If you are suing him yourself for the cost of the repair it is only a civil case, meaning he wont face jail time/fines to the state he would have to pay you the money back though not to the state. I have a BS in pre-law lol we've studied the difference between the two types a lot lol
09-15-2011, 01:35 PM
#36
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-13-11
Location: Olney, MD
Posts: 8,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Definitely not criminal, if you push the issue with the cops and they arrest him, it will become a criminal case between him and the state.
If you are suing him yourself for the cost of the repair it is only a civil case, meaning he wont face jail time/fines to the state he would have to pay you the money back though not to the state. I have a BS in pre-law lol we've studied the difference between the two types a lot lol
If you are suing him yourself for the cost of the repair it is only a civil case, meaning he wont face jail time/fines to the state he would have to pay you the money back though not to the state. I have a BS in pre-law lol we've studied the difference between the two types a lot lol
so your telling me if this is just a civil case. i sue him, i win. and i get nothing in return because he cant pay up!?!!!
09-15-2011, 02:51 PM
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-14-09
Location: Anna, TX
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exactly. There's things you can do to get your money, but those are other lawsuits in themselves.
09-15-2011, 03:05 PM
#39
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-13-11
Location: Olney, MD
Posts: 8,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09-15-2011, 08:02 PM
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-14-09
Location: Anna, TX
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From Wikipedia:
Enforcement
When a final judgment is entered, the plaintiff is usually barred under the doctrine of res judicata from trying to bring the same or similar claim again against that defendant, or from relitigating any of the issues, even under different legal claims or theories. This prevents a new trial of the same case with a different result, or if the plaintiff won, a repeat trial that merely multiplies the judgment against the defendant.
If the judgment is for the plaintiff, then the defendant must comply under penalty of law with the judgment, which will usually be a monetary award. If the defendant fails to pay, the court has various powers to seize any of the defendant's assets located within its jurisdiction, such as:
* Writ of execution
* Bank account garnishment
* Liens
* Wage garnishment
If all assets are located elsewhere, the plaintiff must file another suit in the appropriate court to seek enforcement of the other court's previous judgment. This can be a difficult task when crossing from a court in one state or nation to another, though courts tend to grant each other respect when there is not a clear legal rule to the contrary. A defendant who has no assets in any jurisdiction is said to be "judgment-proof."[5] The term is generally a colloquialism to describe an impecunious defendant.
Indigent judgment-proof defendants are no longer imprisoned; debtor's prisons have been outlawed by statute, constitutional amendment, or international human rights treaties in the vast majority of common law jurisdictions.
09-15-2011, 11:57 PM
#42
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-13-11
Location: Olney, MD
Posts: 8,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When you "win" your civil case, and he doesn't pay up, then you take him to court to dock his paycheck, etc.
From Wikipedia:
Enforcement
When a final judgment is entered, the plaintiff is usually barred under the doctrine of res judicata from trying to bring the same or similar claim again against that defendant, or from relitigating any of the issues, even under different legal claims or theories. This prevents a new trial of the same case with a different result, or if the plaintiff won, a repeat trial that merely multiplies the judgment against the defendant.
If the judgment is for the plaintiff, then the defendant must comply under penalty of law with the judgment, which will usually be a monetary award. If the defendant fails to pay, the court has various powers to seize any of the defendant's assets located within its jurisdiction, such as:
* Writ of execution
* Bank account garnishment
* Liens
* Wage garnishment
If all assets are located elsewhere, the plaintiff must file another suit in the appropriate court to seek enforcement of the other court's previous judgment. This can be a difficult task when crossing from a court in one state or nation to another, though courts tend to grant each other respect when there is not a clear legal rule to the contrary. A defendant who has no assets in any jurisdiction is said to be "judgment-proof."[5] The term is generally a colloquialism to describe an impecunious defendant.
Indigent judgment-proof defendants are no longer imprisoned; debtor's prisons have been outlawed by statute, constitutional amendment, or international human rights treaties in the vast majority of common law jurisdictions.
From Wikipedia:
Enforcement
When a final judgment is entered, the plaintiff is usually barred under the doctrine of res judicata from trying to bring the same or similar claim again against that defendant, or from relitigating any of the issues, even under different legal claims or theories. This prevents a new trial of the same case with a different result, or if the plaintiff won, a repeat trial that merely multiplies the judgment against the defendant.
If the judgment is for the plaintiff, then the defendant must comply under penalty of law with the judgment, which will usually be a monetary award. If the defendant fails to pay, the court has various powers to seize any of the defendant's assets located within its jurisdiction, such as:
* Writ of execution
* Bank account garnishment
* Liens
* Wage garnishment
If all assets are located elsewhere, the plaintiff must file another suit in the appropriate court to seek enforcement of the other court's previous judgment. This can be a difficult task when crossing from a court in one state or nation to another, though courts tend to grant each other respect when there is not a clear legal rule to the contrary. A defendant who has no assets in any jurisdiction is said to be "judgment-proof."[5] The term is generally a colloquialism to describe an impecunious defendant.
Indigent judgment-proof defendants are no longer imprisoned; debtor's prisons have been outlawed by statute, constitutional amendment, or international human rights treaties in the vast majority of common law jurisdictions.
okay cool, sounds good. but like i said. kids a loser. has no money, no job, nothing... all he has is a lt1 roadmaster...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post