ss or ls.
04-23-2012, 02:42 AM
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: 01-10-10
Location: Under a cozy rock
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So why would I want a base model cobalt that's has the same power and less torque as my cavalier? Why build that when I could build my cavalier (which I already own). I also never said my old cars have power. I did grow up with a car that has more power and torque than my SS does.
04-23-2012, 11:56 AM
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-15-11
Location: Shelton, CT
Posts: 1,811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So why would I want a base model cobalt that's has the same power and less torque as my cavalier? Why build that when I could build my cavalier (which I already own). I also never said my old cars have power. I did grow up with a car that has more power and torque than my SS does.
04-23-2012, 01:56 PM
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: 01-10-10
Location: Under a cozy rock
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm all for no replacement for displacement as well, but Everyone's making the base model Delta's seem so much worse than they actually are. There's NOTHING WRONG with tuning a 2.2L or 2.4L Delta. Personally, I find the fun in the journey and the reaping of the rewards. Not just buying the the car tuned and enjoying it. It's somehow not as fulfilling.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post