Michigan
#6804
#6814
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
No.
That's not unheard of...
I love drinking.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Definitely glad I went to my buddy's apartment at U of M last weekend. The beer cans are mine. The rest of the **** is his messy ass roomates'...
I love drinking.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Definitely glad I went to my buddy's apartment at U of M last weekend. The beer cans are mine. The rest of the **** is his messy ass roomates'...
Last edited by MP81; 03-29-2011 at 10:44 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#6816
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-29-10
Location: Holloman AFB NM
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone else think this new teen driving law is assinine? Why even place the "driving to/from work" restriction between 10pm & 5am? As if cops will have any way of verifying if the driver was headed somewhere other than work or home. All someone has to do is just put on a bullshit name tag and the coming home from work excuse flies. Furthermore, I think this law will only profile young drivers. I understand the premise behind the law because teens are more likely to get into accidents than older, more experienced drivers--I just think they're going about it the wrong way. To me this law says it's okay to pull people over because they "look young". It opens the door to profiling.
#6817
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
I see what you did there...
And yes, that new teen driving law is completely and utterly misguided. Whoever thought that one was a good idea should probably enjoy a swim in the Detroit River with some cement shoes.
And yes, that new teen driving law is completely and utterly misguided. Whoever thought that one was a good idea should probably enjoy a swim in the Detroit River with some cement shoes.
Last edited by MP81; 03-30-2011 at 07:52 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#6818
Does anyone else think this new teen driving law is assinine? Why even place the "driving to/from work" restriction between 10pm & 5am? As if cops will have any way of verifying if the driver was headed somewhere other than work or home. All someone has to do is just put on a bullshit name tag and the coming home from work excuse flies. Furthermore, I think this law will only profile young drivers. I understand the premise behind the law because teens are more likely to get into accidents than older, more experienced drivers--I just think they're going about it the wrong way. To me this law says it's okay to pull people over because they "look young". It opens the door to profiling.
#6820
Senior Member
Does anyone else think this new teen driving law is assinine? Why even place the "driving to/from work" restriction between 10pm & 5am? As if cops will have any way of verifying if the driver was headed somewhere other than work or home. All someone has to do is just put on a bullshit name tag and the coming home from work excuse flies. Furthermore, I think this law will only profile young drivers. I understand the premise behind the law because teens are more likely to get into accidents than older, more experienced drivers--I just think they're going about it the wrong way. To me this law says it's okay to pull people over because they "look young". It opens the door to profiling.
#6821
#6822
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: 04-17-07
Location: Willis, Michigan
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone else think this new teen driving law is assinine? Why even place the "driving to/from work" restriction between 10pm & 5am? As if cops will have any way of verifying if the driver was headed somewhere other than work or home. All someone has to do is just put on a bullshit name tag and the coming home from work excuse flies. Furthermore, I think this law will only profile young drivers. I understand the premise behind the law because teens are more likely to get into accidents than older, more experienced drivers--I just think they're going about it the wrong way. To me this law says it's okay to pull people over because they "look young". It opens the door to profiling.
#6824
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-29-10
Location: Holloman AFB NM
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Goddamn the wings are horrible. It's not even them, it's their goalies. **** I'd take Jimmy Howard's random ass over these guys. You know your team is fucked when your backup goalie gets pulled and you have to put in the backup for the backup. I mean how the hell does a 2nd place team utterly get the **** kicked out of them by a 12th place team? I hate to say this but it's not looking good for the wings. At this point I highly doubt they will make it to the western conference finals. I already think Vancouver is going to win the cup this year.
#6825
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-04-10
Location: michigan
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Totally agree the wings need howard and thats sad that i said it because he sucks also. We needed nabi but that didnt happen. With goaltending like this we will be lucky to even win a game in the play offs. Not to mention the only d we have worth a damn is lidstrom so when he retires i may have to pick a more worthy team to cheer for