North Central ND, SD, MN, and WI

Wisconsin Thread (Team Rev & Others)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2012 | 12:28 PM
  #5201  
AaronJ's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 02-07-10
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 2
From: Oshkosh, WI
Originally Posted by ebristol
Have you read this?

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l...tuners-232430/

It basically says most of what you are saying. And there are dimishing returns on performance and a greater decrease in fuel economy going past and ~E50 blend.

How could would it be to have access to one of these stations?

That would be awesome. All the unmanned stations like Renew and Smart all seem to have gone out of business around here. They used to have pumps dedicated to e25, which was a mix consisting of e85 and premium. Winner! Now all the unmanned stations only sell gasoline and they all cost as much, if not more, than the convinience stations.
Old 08-29-2012 | 02:21 PM
  #5202  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 3
From: WI
Renew did not go out of business, they were sued by BP and Shell Corps and were forced out of the market.

I used to keep email contact with one of their employees and he would keep me posted on the season blend changes. Like this.

4 Corners- SP2.6, 78.35%, 4/28 7:15 am****
Cedar Grove- SP1.6, 77.95%, 4/11 5:05 am, S0.5, 82.15%, 5/11 5:30 pm
Grand Chute- SP4.6, 78.37%, 5/1 9:17 am, S1, 82.17%, 5/11 3:27 pm
Howard- S0.6, 82.37%, 5/7 1:29 pm, S1.6, 83.11%, 5/11 11:55 am
Kewaunee- SP1, 75.65%, 4/3 6:01 pm, S1, 81.50%, 5/3 4:40 pm
Little Chute- SP3.2, 78.35%, 4/25 7:29 am, S0.4, 82.0%, 5/7 12:44 pm, UPDATE S1, 82.89%, 5/12 1 pm
Manitowoc- SP2.6, 78.19%, 4/21 11:08 am, S1, 80.80%, 5/9 7:16 am
Mayville- SP1.3, 76.45%, 4/10 12:50 pm, S1, 81.84%, 5/4 11:27 am
Oostburg- SP1.4, 77.12%, 4/11 5:50 am, S0.5, 81.72%, 5/11 6:19 am
Oshkosh Green Valley SP3.1, 78.35%, 4/22 2:55 pm, S1, 82.72%, 5/6 5:36 am
Oshkosh South Park SP4.5, 78.40%, 4/30 11:16 am, S1, 82.25%, 5/10 3:51 pm
Plover- SP3.2, 78.24%, 4/25 10:56 am, S1, 82:31%, 5/11 1:46 pm
Seymour- SP1.6, 77.80%, 4/10 4:40 pm, UPDATE S0.5, 81.38%, 5/12 1:51 pm
Sheboygan Falls- SP2.8, 78.28%, 4/28 1:21 pm****
Waupaca, SP2.8, 78.27%, 4/29 4:29 am
Waupun, SP2.9, 78.29%, 4/25 9:01 am, S1, 82.69%, 5/9 10:12 am
Wautoma- SP2.9, 78.31%, 4/21 6:56 pm, S1 80.82%, 5/9 11:52 am
Winneconne- SP2.4, 78.14%, 4/30 1:11 pm

They were a "Blend in the tank" setup so when they switched from one blend to another, they did it by adding E98 to the tank to bring up the blend or E10 to the tank to bring the blend down.

If I was running the winter blend and they were switching to the Springs blend I would know which stations had which blend. Typically blend changes would take 3 or 4 loads over the course of 2 or 3 weeks. I could hold off on switching by filling up at the slower stations or I could get a head start by filling up at the high volume stations. Life was good!

Now I pretty much stick to the Kwik Trips.
Old 08-29-2012 | 02:31 PM
  #5203  
07cobaltguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-07
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2
From: Jackson, Wisconsin
BP is the major carrier out here in my area. No one knows what blend they are on, most dont even know there is different blends.
Old 08-29-2012 | 06:44 PM
  #5204  
Whitnith's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 05-05-07
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by AaronJ
Haha want to talk about bad gas mileage? I was getting about 1 lap per gallon at RA. I bet Whitney was only getting 1 lap per 1.5 gallons on e85
I was using just over 1/4 tank per 20 min session, no problem, and I'm sure next time I'm at RA will use more, since I'm faster now. I have a 5 gallon gas can I take along with me now, but I still plan on having to run back to a station during a track day. The other thing is that if you get below 1/2 tank you will start sloshing and lose the pickup, which can be bad.

Last edited by Whitnith; 09-04-2012 at 12:25 PM.
Old 08-29-2012 | 07:58 PM
  #5205  
stealthy1ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-27-06
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 3
From: Road America
I can't make it a full day at the track without going to the gas station and that includes the 2 (5) gallon cans I have.
Old 08-30-2012 | 02:10 AM
  #5206  
jamies06ss/sc's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 11-29-10
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: la crosse wisconsin
Originally Posted by 07cobaltguy
why is running 105 octane E85 to get more timing and reduce knock and get more power doing something wrong?
Because It kinda sucks, I'm pro tuned on e85 my buddy box tune 91 barely slower. And ya It's safer, knock protection but if It's tuned right you never have to worry about that, and It's 105 cool 10 more hp maybe, and more timing cool, I bump my timing up 3 to max level gain .5 whp literally! If you want power, real power, get a bigger blower/ turbo run less boost! around here e-85 is hard to find, and super inconsistent, one sec run find then run like ****! I may be biased cause it shows little real benefit to my set up, but even on my buddies 665 awhp EVO it kinda sucks. Maybe e-47 is better Idk. Race gas seems to be the boss when it comes to real power, c-16 120+ ftmfw!!
Old 08-30-2012 | 10:45 AM
  #5207  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by jamies06ss/sc
Because It kinda sucks, I'm pro tuned on e85 my buddy box tune 91 barely slower.
What is pro tuned?
Old 08-30-2012 | 03:55 PM
  #5208  
stealthy1ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-27-06
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 3
From: Road America
Originally Posted by jamies06ss/sc
Because It kinda sucks, I'm pro tuned on e85 my buddy box tune 91 barely slower. And ya It's safer, knock protection but if It's tuned right you never have to worry about that, and It's 105 cool 10 more hp maybe, and more timing cool, I bump my timing up 3 to max level gain .5 whp literally! If you want power, real power, get a bigger blower/ turbo run less boost! around here e-85 is hard to find, and super inconsistent, one sec run find then run like ****! I may be biased cause it shows little real benefit to my set up, but even on my buddies 665 awhp EVO it kinda sucks. Maybe e-47 is better Idk. Race gas seems to be the boss when it comes to real power, c-16 120+ ftmfw!!
You might want to get a new tuner if you thing you are only getting about 10 more whp with E85. I am making at least 50whp more with just running E85.
Old 08-30-2012 | 04:14 PM
  #5209  
395 plus's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-23-08
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
From: Plymouth, WI
Originally Posted by stealthy1ss
You might want to get a new tuner if you thing you are only getting about 10 more whp with E85. I am making at least 50whp more with just running E85.
Thats about right you and I had similar mods except you had E-85 and our dyno runs were about 45hp different.
Old 08-30-2012 | 04:32 PM
  #5210  
padlock's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: 07-20-09
Posts: 5,334
Likes: 0
From: Platteville, WI
^also seems reasonable for what I've seen in the LNFs (35-50whp difference in bumping to E85 depending on location and tuner)

Originally Posted by stealthy1ss
You might want to get a new tuner if you thing you are only getting about 10 more whp with E85. I am making at least 50whp more with just running E85.
the best part is he is ZZP dyno tuned.. ftw?? idk?? dont seem like it


Last edited by padlock; 08-30-2012 at 04:33 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 08-30-2012 | 05:00 PM
  #5211  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 3
From: WI
Here is my premium vs E85 dyno results. Red is Premium w/ a 2.8" pulley and Blue E85 w/ a 2.7".

Name:  M62E85vsPremium.jpg
Views: 28
Size:  70.5 KB
Old 08-31-2012 | 09:15 AM
  #5212  
07cobaltguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-07
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2
From: Jackson, Wisconsin
Anyone have a stock downpipe they would part with?
Old 09-01-2012 | 01:20 PM
  #5213  
Ch1ck3n's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 03-05-10
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wi
There's a big car show in west bend tomorrow. Anyone interested in going?

My cell number is 440-396-9940 if anyone wants to meet up in the Milwaukee area..
Old 09-01-2012 | 02:18 PM
  #5214  
jzehren11's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-05-11
Posts: 9,007
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Ready for the Badger Game to start!!!!!!
Old 09-01-2012 | 02:26 PM
  #5215  
07cobaltguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-07
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2
From: Jackson, Wisconsin
I live right outside west bend maybe we will make it out
Old 09-02-2012 | 06:26 AM
  #5216  
slowbalt262's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-20-12
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Kenosha
Originally Posted by 07cobaltguy
Anyone have a stock downpipe they would part with?
if you had an Lnf i have a spare one in the garage for you
Old 09-02-2012 | 06:35 AM
  #5217  
slowbalt262's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-20-12
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Kenosha
Its time to part ways with the car. Just getting the word out there.

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/comp...-coupe-285732/
Old 09-02-2012 | 09:44 AM
  #5218  
07cobaltguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-01-07
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 2
From: Jackson, Wisconsin
Maybe interested. I would have to unload my car first though.
Old 09-02-2012 | 11:51 AM
  #5219  
slowbalt262's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-20-12
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Kenosha
Walworth County Fair anyone?
Old 09-04-2012 | 11:46 AM
  #5220  
jamies06ss/sc's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 11-29-10
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: la crosse wisconsin
For SC cars on stock blower e-85 is really not that cool, but yes my car made 285 on a 2.8, thats Probly 15 more then on 91, 50 more is impossible, that would mean that my buddy with the same mods would be making 235 and can keep up with me. I think not. Most guys with a 2.8 on pump make ~ 260-270 from what i was told by turbo TIM.
Old 09-04-2012 | 12:35 PM
  #5221  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by jamies06ss/sc
I think not. Most guys with a 2.8 on pump make ~ 260-270 from what i was told by turbo TIM.
That is about right with a good custom tune and good cooling mods. But no one running a basic can'd tune is making that much.

But either way, there is not that much of a HP difference between running a 2.9" pulley and a 2.6" with a good tune. The difference is in the TQ. With a 2.6" I made 303whp/273wtq on the same dyno that Tyler made 292whp/248wtq with a 2.9".

And PEAK HP don't really mean a lot because the engine spends so little time operating at 6500rpms. The entire powerband is what is important.

But back to your point: Look at my dyno graph.

Name:  M62E85vsPremium.jpg
Views: 21
Size:  70.5 KB

Peak HP @ 6500rpms, the E85 tune has 22 more whp then the premium. Peak TQ @ 4600rpms, the E85 tune has 21 more wtq then the premium. That is a huge difference at those points. And the TQ differences are much greater on the low end. @ 3500rpms the E85 tune is making at least 30wtq more then the premium tune. How is that not worth it?

And that is on my first E85 tune. My current one is much better.

You are probably not as happy with your tune because your TQ numbers are pretty low. You are making the same TQ as most guys running premium. ZZP needs needs to ramp that timing a lot harder on the low end. You might give up a few ponies up top but it will make your entire powerband much better.

Old 09-04-2012 | 12:41 PM
  #5222  
padlock's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: 07-20-09
Posts: 5,334
Likes: 0
From: Platteville, WI
:eatingpopcorn:
Old 09-04-2012 | 12:56 PM
  #5223  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 3
From: WI
Put your popcorn away...

I don't want to start a fight. But saying E85 is not worth it is just not true.
Old 09-04-2012 | 01:26 PM
  #5224  
jamies06ss/sc's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 11-29-10
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: la crosse wisconsin
Originally Posted by ebristol
Here is my premium vs E85 dyno results. Red is Premium w/ a 2.8" pulley and Blue E85 w/ a 2.7".

22 HP off a pulley drop and e85...what was the boost difference, and what intake and exhaust were you running at this time?
Old 09-04-2012 | 02:10 PM
  #5225  
padlock's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: 07-20-09
Posts: 5,334
Likes: 0
From: Platteville, WI
i like debates like this.. its educational


Quick Reply: Wisconsin Thread (Team Rev & Others)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 AM.