Wisconsin Thread (Team Rev & Others)
#5201
Have you read this?
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l...tuners-232430/
It basically says most of what you are saying. And there are dimishing returns on performance and a greater decrease in fuel economy going past and ~E50 blend.
How could would it be to have access to one of these stations?
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l...tuners-232430/
It basically says most of what you are saying. And there are dimishing returns on performance and a greater decrease in fuel economy going past and ~E50 blend.
How could would it be to have access to one of these stations?
#5202
Renew did not go out of business, they were sued by BP and Shell Corps and were forced out of the market.
I used to keep email contact with one of their employees and he would keep me posted on the season blend changes. Like this.
4 Corners- SP2.6, 78.35%, 4/28 7:15 am****
Cedar Grove- SP1.6, 77.95%, 4/11 5:05 am, S0.5, 82.15%, 5/11 5:30 pm
Grand Chute- SP4.6, 78.37%, 5/1 9:17 am, S1, 82.17%, 5/11 3:27 pm
Howard- S0.6, 82.37%, 5/7 1:29 pm, S1.6, 83.11%, 5/11 11:55 am
Kewaunee- SP1, 75.65%, 4/3 6:01 pm, S1, 81.50%, 5/3 4:40 pm
Little Chute- SP3.2, 78.35%, 4/25 7:29 am, S0.4, 82.0%, 5/7 12:44 pm, UPDATE S1, 82.89%, 5/12 1 pm
Manitowoc- SP2.6, 78.19%, 4/21 11:08 am, S1, 80.80%, 5/9 7:16 am
Mayville- SP1.3, 76.45%, 4/10 12:50 pm, S1, 81.84%, 5/4 11:27 am
Oostburg- SP1.4, 77.12%, 4/11 5:50 am, S0.5, 81.72%, 5/11 6:19 am
Oshkosh Green Valley SP3.1, 78.35%, 4/22 2:55 pm, S1, 82.72%, 5/6 5:36 am
Oshkosh South Park SP4.5, 78.40%, 4/30 11:16 am, S1, 82.25%, 5/10 3:51 pm
Plover- SP3.2, 78.24%, 4/25 10:56 am, S1, 82:31%, 5/11 1:46 pm
Seymour- SP1.6, 77.80%, 4/10 4:40 pm, UPDATE S0.5, 81.38%, 5/12 1:51 pm
Sheboygan Falls- SP2.8, 78.28%, 4/28 1:21 pm****
Waupaca, SP2.8, 78.27%, 4/29 4:29 am
Waupun, SP2.9, 78.29%, 4/25 9:01 am, S1, 82.69%, 5/9 10:12 am
Wautoma- SP2.9, 78.31%, 4/21 6:56 pm, S1 80.82%, 5/9 11:52 am
Winneconne- SP2.4, 78.14%, 4/30 1:11 pm
They were a "Blend in the tank" setup so when they switched from one blend to another, they did it by adding E98 to the tank to bring up the blend or E10 to the tank to bring the blend down.
If I was running the winter blend and they were switching to the Springs blend I would know which stations had which blend. Typically blend changes would take 3 or 4 loads over the course of 2 or 3 weeks. I could hold off on switching by filling up at the slower stations or I could get a head start by filling up at the high volume stations. Life was good!
Now I pretty much stick to the Kwik Trips.
I used to keep email contact with one of their employees and he would keep me posted on the season blend changes. Like this.
4 Corners- SP2.6, 78.35%, 4/28 7:15 am****
Cedar Grove- SP1.6, 77.95%, 4/11 5:05 am, S0.5, 82.15%, 5/11 5:30 pm
Grand Chute- SP4.6, 78.37%, 5/1 9:17 am, S1, 82.17%, 5/11 3:27 pm
Howard- S0.6, 82.37%, 5/7 1:29 pm, S1.6, 83.11%, 5/11 11:55 am
Kewaunee- SP1, 75.65%, 4/3 6:01 pm, S1, 81.50%, 5/3 4:40 pm
Little Chute- SP3.2, 78.35%, 4/25 7:29 am, S0.4, 82.0%, 5/7 12:44 pm, UPDATE S1, 82.89%, 5/12 1 pm
Manitowoc- SP2.6, 78.19%, 4/21 11:08 am, S1, 80.80%, 5/9 7:16 am
Mayville- SP1.3, 76.45%, 4/10 12:50 pm, S1, 81.84%, 5/4 11:27 am
Oostburg- SP1.4, 77.12%, 4/11 5:50 am, S0.5, 81.72%, 5/11 6:19 am
Oshkosh Green Valley SP3.1, 78.35%, 4/22 2:55 pm, S1, 82.72%, 5/6 5:36 am
Oshkosh South Park SP4.5, 78.40%, 4/30 11:16 am, S1, 82.25%, 5/10 3:51 pm
Plover- SP3.2, 78.24%, 4/25 10:56 am, S1, 82:31%, 5/11 1:46 pm
Seymour- SP1.6, 77.80%, 4/10 4:40 pm, UPDATE S0.5, 81.38%, 5/12 1:51 pm
Sheboygan Falls- SP2.8, 78.28%, 4/28 1:21 pm****
Waupaca, SP2.8, 78.27%, 4/29 4:29 am
Waupun, SP2.9, 78.29%, 4/25 9:01 am, S1, 82.69%, 5/9 10:12 am
Wautoma- SP2.9, 78.31%, 4/21 6:56 pm, S1 80.82%, 5/9 11:52 am
Winneconne- SP2.4, 78.14%, 4/30 1:11 pm
They were a "Blend in the tank" setup so when they switched from one blend to another, they did it by adding E98 to the tank to bring up the blend or E10 to the tank to bring the blend down.
If I was running the winter blend and they were switching to the Springs blend I would know which stations had which blend. Typically blend changes would take 3 or 4 loads over the course of 2 or 3 weeks. I could hold off on switching by filling up at the slower stations or I could get a head start by filling up at the high volume stations. Life was good!
Now I pretty much stick to the Kwik Trips.
#5204
I was using just over 1/4 tank per 20 min session, no problem, and I'm sure next time I'm at RA will use more, since I'm faster now. I have a 5 gallon gas can I take along with me now, but I still plan on having to run back to a station during a track day. The other thing is that if you get below 1/2 tank you will start sloshing and lose the pickup, which can be bad.
Last edited by Whitnith; 09-04-2012 at 12:25 PM.
#5206
Because It kinda sucks, I'm pro tuned on e85 my buddy box tune 91 barely slower. And ya It's safer, knock protection but if It's tuned right you never have to worry about that, and It's 105 cool 10 more hp maybe, and more timing cool, I bump my timing up 3 to max level gain .5 whp literally! If you want power, real power, get a bigger blower/ turbo run less boost! around here e-85 is hard to find, and super inconsistent, one sec run find then run like ****! I may be biased cause it shows little real benefit to my set up, but even on my buddies 665 awhp EVO it kinda sucks. Maybe e-47 is better Idk. Race gas seems to be the boss when it comes to real power, c-16 120+ ftmfw!!
#5208
Because It kinda sucks, I'm pro tuned on e85 my buddy box tune 91 barely slower. And ya It's safer, knock protection but if It's tuned right you never have to worry about that, and It's 105 cool 10 more hp maybe, and more timing cool, I bump my timing up 3 to max level gain .5 whp literally! If you want power, real power, get a bigger blower/ turbo run less boost! around here e-85 is hard to find, and super inconsistent, one sec run find then run like ****! I may be biased cause it shows little real benefit to my set up, but even on my buddies 665 awhp EVO it kinda sucks. Maybe e-47 is better Idk. Race gas seems to be the boss when it comes to real power, c-16 120+ ftmfw!!
#5209
#5210
^also seems reasonable for what I've seen in the LNFs (35-50whp difference in bumping to E85 depending on location and tuner)
the best part is he is ZZP dyno tuned.. ftw?? idk?? dont seem like it
Last edited by padlock; 08-30-2012 at 04:33 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#5217
Its time to part ways with the car. Just getting the word out there.
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/comp...-coupe-285732/
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/comp...-coupe-285732/
#5220
For SC cars on stock blower e-85 is really not that cool, but yes my car made 285 on a 2.8, thats Probly 15 more then on 91, 50 more is impossible, that would mean that my buddy with the same mods would be making 235 and can keep up with me. I think not. Most guys with a 2.8 on pump make ~ 260-270 from what i was told by turbo TIM.
#5221
But either way, there is not that much of a HP difference between running a 2.9" pulley and a 2.6" with a good tune. The difference is in the TQ. With a 2.6" I made 303whp/273wtq on the same dyno that Tyler made 292whp/248wtq with a 2.9".
And PEAK HP don't really mean a lot because the engine spends so little time operating at 6500rpms. The entire powerband is what is important.
But back to your point: Look at my dyno graph.
Peak HP @ 6500rpms, the E85 tune has 22 more whp then the premium. Peak TQ @ 4600rpms, the E85 tune has 21 more wtq then the premium. That is a huge difference at those points. And the TQ differences are much greater on the low end. @ 3500rpms the E85 tune is making at least 30wtq more then the premium tune. How is that not worth it?
And that is on my first E85 tune. My current one is much better.
You are probably not as happy with your tune because your TQ numbers are pretty low. You are making the same TQ as most guys running premium. ZZP needs needs to ramp that timing a lot harder on the low end. You might give up a few ponies up top but it will make your entire powerband much better.
#5224