New Rotated Trans Mounts
#129
#131
That page of the book and the diagram only show SOLID mounts made by Roush Industries for the "Cobalt Phase 5" car...
It discusses nothing of using a modified stock mount..
It DOES however state that tilting the engine forward will help better align the axles on a LOWERED vehicle...
It discusses nothing of using a modified stock mount..
It DOES however state that tilting the engine forward will help better align the axles on a LOWERED vehicle...
#134
#135
...Except they're bolting the engine to the frame, so they're effectively doing both, like I said...
The key thing is - both products have pros and cons.
Using the tilt kit aligns the axles but costs quite a bit more and leaves the driver with a sloppy shift.
Poly mounts will vibrate the cabin and don't solve the axle tilt but keep the engine/transmission from shuddering as much, resulting in a cleaner shift and less engine movement.
GM did both - by bolting the engine and transmission to the frame they tilt the engine forward and also keep the engine/transmission rock steady.
There will be hop with both products as neither of these products solves all the causes on its own. For maximum performance you would need the tilt kit WITH poly transmission mounts, and then you'll need to solve the issue of your engine still rocking since the weak ass stock motor mount does nothing to impede it, and people have stated it will not work with TTR's top mount. You can tilt the engine all you want but with the stock mounts in there it will rock back!
I would love to test this theory - I am interested in buying just the modified 04 front mount and spacer with no bushing. (I couldn't even tell - do I need a new rear mount with the spacer or not?) PM me with the price you can do me for on that.
The key thing is - both products have pros and cons.
Using the tilt kit aligns the axles but costs quite a bit more and leaves the driver with a sloppy shift.
Poly mounts will vibrate the cabin and don't solve the axle tilt but keep the engine/transmission from shuddering as much, resulting in a cleaner shift and less engine movement.
GM did both - by bolting the engine and transmission to the frame they tilt the engine forward and also keep the engine/transmission rock steady.
There will be hop with both products as neither of these products solves all the causes on its own. For maximum performance you would need the tilt kit WITH poly transmission mounts, and then you'll need to solve the issue of your engine still rocking since the weak ass stock motor mount does nothing to impede it, and people have stated it will not work with TTR's top mount. You can tilt the engine all you want but with the stock mounts in there it will rock back!
I would love to test this theory - I am interested in buying just the modified 04 front mount and spacer with no bushing. (I couldn't even tell - do I need a new rear mount with the spacer or not?) PM me with the price you can do me for on that.
Last edited by Dainslaif; 11-19-2008 at 07:34 PM.
#136
...Except they're bolting the engine to the frame, so they're effectively doing both, like I said...
The key thing is - both products have pros and cons.
Using the tilt kit aligns the axles but costs quite a bit more and leaves the driver with a sloppy shift.
Poly mounts will vibrate the cabin and don't solve the axle tilt but keep the engine/transmission from shuddering as much, resulting in a cleaner shift and less engine movement.
GM did both - by bolting the engine and transmission to the frame they tilt the engine forward and also keep the engine/transmission rock steady.
There will be hop with both products as neither of these products solves all the causes on its own. For maximum performance you would need the tilt kit WITH poly transmission mounts, and then you'll need to solve the issue of your engine still rocking since the weak ass stock motor mount does nothing to impede it, and people have stated it will not work with TTR's top mount. You can tilt the engine all you want but with the stock mounts in there it will rock back!
I would love to test this theory - I am interested in buying just the modified 04 front mount and spacer with no bushing. (I couldn't even tell - do I need a new rear mount with the spacer or not?) PM me with the price you can do me for on that.
The key thing is - both products have pros and cons.
Using the tilt kit aligns the axles but costs quite a bit more and leaves the driver with a sloppy shift.
Poly mounts will vibrate the cabin and don't solve the axle tilt but keep the engine/transmission from shuddering as much, resulting in a cleaner shift and less engine movement.
GM did both - by bolting the engine and transmission to the frame they tilt the engine forward and also keep the engine/transmission rock steady.
There will be hop with both products as neither of these products solves all the causes on its own. For maximum performance you would need the tilt kit WITH poly transmission mounts, and then you'll need to solve the issue of your engine still rocking since the weak ass stock motor mount does nothing to impede it, and people have stated it will not work with TTR's top mount. You can tilt the engine all you want but with the stock mounts in there it will rock back!
I would love to test this theory - I am interested in buying just the modified 04 front mount and spacer with no bushing. (I couldn't even tell - do I need a new rear mount with the spacer or not?) PM me with the price you can do me for on that.
#137
The stage 3 limits movement alot, thats why theres some vibes with it. The first stage also cuts down on the engines movement, alot more then you would think. You will always need the spacer under the rear mount and for now this will only be sold as a kit with the bushing installed. I will list them on the site when they are available, about 2 weeks.
Also no one answered my question from above: is the stg3 just both mounts together? If that is the case you said the TC owners would only need the stg 1 correct?
#138
The stage 3 limits movement alot, thats why theres some vibes with it. The first stage also cuts down on the engines movement, alot more then you would think. You will always need the spacer under the rear mount and for now this will only be sold as a kit with the bushing installed. I will list them on the site when they are available, about 2 weeks.
#139
#141
The stage 3 limits movement alot, thats why theres some vibes with it. The first stage also cuts down on the engines movement, alot more then you would think. You will always need the spacer under the rear mount and for now this will only be sold as a kit with the bushing installed. I will list them on the site when they are available, about 2 weeks.
The funny thing is my shifts dont feel that sloppy...but I would assume they would stay the same or improve slightly....just not anywhere near as crisp that polys would give you.
Last edited by cobaltR; 11-19-2008 at 11:22 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#142
...Except they're bolting the engine to the frame, so they're effectively doing both, like I said...
The key thing is - both products have pros and cons.
Using the tilt kit aligns the axles but costs quite a bit more and leaves the driver with a sloppy shift.
Poly mounts will vibrate the cabin and don't solve the axle tilt but keep the engine/transmission from shuddering as much, resulting in a cleaner shift and less engine movement.
GM did both - by bolting the engine and transmission to the frame they tilt the engine forward and also keep the engine/transmission rock steady.
There will be hop with both products as neither of these products solves all the causes on its own. For maximum performance you would need the tilt kit WITH poly transmission mounts, and then you'll need to solve the issue of your engine still rocking since the weak ass stock motor mount does nothing to impede it, and people have stated it will not work with TTR's top mount. You can tilt the engine all you want but with the stock mounts in there it will rock back!
I would love to test this theory - I am interested in buying just the modified 04 front mount and spacer with no bushing. (I couldn't even tell - do I need a new rear mount with the spacer or not?) PM me with the price you can do me for on that.
The key thing is - both products have pros and cons.
Using the tilt kit aligns the axles but costs quite a bit more and leaves the driver with a sloppy shift.
Poly mounts will vibrate the cabin and don't solve the axle tilt but keep the engine/transmission from shuddering as much, resulting in a cleaner shift and less engine movement.
GM did both - by bolting the engine and transmission to the frame they tilt the engine forward and also keep the engine/transmission rock steady.
There will be hop with both products as neither of these products solves all the causes on its own. For maximum performance you would need the tilt kit WITH poly transmission mounts, and then you'll need to solve the issue of your engine still rocking since the weak ass stock motor mount does nothing to impede it, and people have stated it will not work with TTR's top mount. You can tilt the engine all you want but with the stock mounts in there it will rock back!
I would love to test this theory - I am interested in buying just the modified 04 front mount and spacer with no bushing. (I couldn't even tell - do I need a new rear mount with the spacer or not?) PM me with the price you can do me for on that.
i have the stage 3 kit installed, and my shifts aren't sloppy to say the least. the stage 3 limits the movement considerably. but at the same time i don't have half the vibes i did with the poli mounts. another thing about the poli mounts is after a while the bushing in the center becomes loose and this will later lead to the motor and tranny moving side to side a bit, i had this problem myself. when i took off the poli mounts the spacer was even loose, and the tranny mounts were resting against the section they bolt to. this will in time lead to a lot of grinding noises on accel and decel. and i can't even imagine the possible damage it did to the hub bearings and seals.
#143
yes it's true roush did bolt it straight to the frame without and sort of softening compound, i don't think i could live with a DD like that myself.
i have the stage 3 kit installed, and my shifts aren't sloppy to say the least. the stage 3 limits the movement considerably. but at the same time i don't have half the vibes i did with the poli mounts. another thing about the poli mounts is after a while the bushing in the center becomes loose and this will later lead to the motor and tranny moving side to side a bit, i had this problem myself. when i took off the poli mounts the spacer was even loose, and the tranny mounts were resting against the section they bolt to. this will in time lead to a lot of grinding noises on accel and decel. and i can't even imagine the possible damage it did to the hub bearings and seals.
i have the stage 3 kit installed, and my shifts aren't sloppy to say the least. the stage 3 limits the movement considerably. but at the same time i don't have half the vibes i did with the poli mounts. another thing about the poli mounts is after a while the bushing in the center becomes loose and this will later lead to the motor and tranny moving side to side a bit, i had this problem myself. when i took off the poli mounts the spacer was even loose, and the tranny mounts were resting against the section they bolt to. this will in time lead to a lot of grinding noises on accel and decel. and i can't even imagine the possible damage it did to the hub bearings and seals.
#144
#145
#146
1) There are vibes > 2) The vibes are not as great as poly mounts > 3) More effective at preventing wheel hop and less harsh
Simple logic. Connect the dots, if you will...
#147
You are taking things out of context and leaving other things out. Everything is not black and white. Get your head on straight because it's pointless to argue w/ someone who doesn't know any better.
1) There are vibes > 2) The vibes are not as great as poly mounts > 3) More effective at preventing wheel hop and less harsh
Simple logic. Connect the dots, if you will...
1) There are vibes > 2) The vibes are not as great as poly mounts > 3) More effective at preventing wheel hop and less harsh
Simple logic. Connect the dots, if you will...
#149
You are taking things out of context and leaving other things out. Everything is not black and white. Get your head on straight because it's pointless to argue w/ someone who doesn't know any better.
1) There are vibes > 2) The vibes are not as great as poly mounts > 3) More effective at preventing wheel hop and less harsh
Simple logic. Connect the dots, if you will...
1) There are vibes > 2) The vibes are not as great as poly mounts > 3) More effective at preventing wheel hop and less harsh
Simple logic. Connect the dots, if you will...
So by paying 8 times as much as poly ($50 for prothane I saw), you get about half the vibs...
I am not sure if I care that much about a few vibs for 8 times the price.
#150
Once again, to try and win an e-argument, you left out important facts to "sound" right. Don't quit your day job bud...