Mark this thread as Unsold
For Sale 3" ZZP Intake for LSJ (BRAND NEW!)
09-22-2010, 09:20 PM
#51
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: 04-10-08
Location: Illinois
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
99% sure is pretty confident. But I beg the differ. Pretty interesting thread nonetheless, comparing the Injen intake to ZZP's 3incher.
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/zz-p...ntakes-160229/
post #56 according to ZZP, the Injen is 2.75.
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/zz-p...ntakes-160229/
post #56 according to ZZP, the Injen is 2.75.
We monitored spark and correlated AF ratio with gm/s to eliminate what you're saying could be an issue.
I think most of you are missing the point of this thread and I don't think it should have been moved to the ZZP section. We did not do a test to see if our intake was the best. I do not believe there to be significant performance differences in the tube of same diameter. The injen is 2.75 so it makes for a good test of all intakes that are 2.75 and ours is 3" so it does the same for 3" intakes.
Stock intake was only 8 WHP less than ours and 8.5 less than perfect. We consider the testing on intake tubes to be complete at this point and testing other brands wouldn't make much sense to me unless they were right there. People here would interpret the results wrong anyway. Once we saw the pipe wasn't the restriction anymore, we moved to filter and TB and blower inlet. That is where the data is more important currently.
Everyone here just wants a simple test of intakes to see 'what's the best' and you can't do a test like that. If we did the AF ratio would change, then we could test like Witt said w/o the MAF but then people would complain about it not being how they run it. All the dyno info wouldn't apply anyway to their car and we'd get into discussing one intake better than another depending on if you tuned it or not.
I think most of you are missing the point of this thread and I don't think it should have been moved to the ZZP section. We did not do a test to see if our intake was the best. I do not believe there to be significant performance differences in the tube of same diameter. The injen is 2.75 so it makes for a good test of all intakes that are 2.75 and ours is 3" so it does the same for 3" intakes.
Stock intake was only 8 WHP less than ours and 8.5 less than perfect. We consider the testing on intake tubes to be complete at this point and testing other brands wouldn't make much sense to me unless they were right there. People here would interpret the results wrong anyway. Once we saw the pipe wasn't the restriction anymore, we moved to filter and TB and blower inlet. That is where the data is more important currently.
Everyone here just wants a simple test of intakes to see 'what's the best' and you can't do a test like that. If we did the AF ratio would change, then we could test like Witt said w/o the MAF but then people would complain about it not being how they run it. All the dyno info wouldn't apply anyway to their car and we'd get into discussing one intake better than another depending on if you tuned it or not.
09-23-2010, 03:51 PM
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-14-08
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09-24-2010, 07:47 AM
#56
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: 06-09-10
Location: Clevelad,OH
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you still have the zzp cai for sale? I tried to read and find out but there is too much going on. If you need to get rid of it i can send you 150 to your paypal tonight. Pm me and let me know=)
09-24-2010, 08:11 AM
#57
Senior Member
yo sell it to whoever since u DID NOT show up to the meet haha. i bought another gun yesterday so im strapped for cash newayz till next pay. good luck with the sale bro and bump for a good dood. LATERRRR
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post