War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

03 Mustang GT Got owned.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2007, 09:42 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Blainestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-19-05
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lithium
So far the only stang to "put it on me" was that Mach 1 in the vid posted up in here.

I'll link it in a sec.

But that was before my full exhaust. I haven't even dynoed it yet so I don't know how much I gained, but it was noticeable. And I thought the new mustangs were slower, aren't they like 300-500lbs heavier than the old ones??? (i.e. 99-04 is like 3200-3700 and 05+ is like 3500-4100?)
The '05+ GT's are significantly faster than the 99-04's. Comparing two manual transmission cars, the '05 makes ~40whp more than the '04 and weighs 100-200 lb more or so. Good driving in an '04 yields low-14's in an '04 and mid-13's in an '05+.

If you're making 270whp, though, you should compare favorably to even the '05 considering you weigh significanly less than it. It's only chance would be if he could really hook from a dig. What kind of times are you running, btw?
Old 02-08-2007, 09:43 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
InfinityzeN's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-02-06
Location: Harker Heights, TX
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heavier, but have a lot better engine power curve.
Old 02-08-2007, 10:03 AM
  #28  
New Member
 
Lithium's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-12-06
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blainestang
The '05+ GT's are significantly faster than the 99-04's. Comparing two manual transmission cars, the '05 makes ~40whp more than the '04 and weighs 100-200 lb more or so. Good driving in an '04 yields low-14's in an '04 and mid-13's in an '05+.

If you're making 270whp, though, you should compare favorably to even the '05 considering you weigh significanly less than it. It's only chance would be if he could really hook from a dig. What kind of times are you running, btw?
For one they must have our weight severely off in the mags cause I weighed the car with a 1/4 tank and me in it at the scales here in town and I weighed in at 2984, but the mags all say anywhere from 2950-3200. I've only seen one put it at 2780.

I have yet to run at the track, but my numbers wouldn't be that impressive up here anyway. Our track sits at 5200'. Or normal D/A is between 5500-7500' so......
Old 02-08-2007, 10:41 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
monkeiboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-30-06
Location: West Memphis, AR
Posts: 3,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blainestang
Nope, BRAND NEW @ Brandon Ford near Tampa, FL.
My bad, I thought 2004 was the new model stang. Those were the anniversary edition.
In that case, yeah. 18k is about right.
Old 02-08-2007, 10:47 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Blainestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-19-05
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lithium
For one they must have our weight severely off in the mags cause I weighed the car with a 1/4 tank and me in it at the scales here in town and I weighed in at 2984, but the mags all say anywhere from 2950-3200. I've only seen one put it at 2780.

I have yet to run at the track, but my numbers wouldn't be that impressive up here anyway. Our track sits at 5200'. Or normal D/A is between 5500-7500' so......
I wanna say that curb weight includes the car being topped off on all fluids and such, and maybe a couple other qualifications. So, in my car, the tank is ~15 gal and gas weighs somewhere near ~7lb/gallon, so that's a little over 100lbs right there. That could be part of the difference. Who knows.

With regard to 1/4-mile times, you could always use the correction factors for your DA, but yeah, it would definitely be better to just race at a track that's nearer to sea level. Seems more legitimate that way... to me at least.
Old 02-08-2007, 10:47 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
R&C_rallySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-09-06
Location: PA
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Freakenhye
No Mods. Pure Stock. And thats why im suprised. He was shocked. when we stopped and talked. I had no wheel spin gunning it in first from a rolling ten and he was trying to catch up after that.
I love beating those slow stangs! They always think just cuz they have a GT they are fast! Keep up the good kills!!
Old 02-08-2007, 11:11 AM
  #32  
Member
 
pvirga88's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-01-06
Location: Yonkers, NY
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I haven't had an experience with a GT yet. but I raced a V6.
I gave him about 3 to 4 cars to make him feel special at first then I creeped up an him and passed him like he was standing still. He couldn't catch me after that. I had to slow down to about 100 mph just to let him catch up a bit. We bothed pulled over and was bullshitting for a while. He had a Borla Exhaust and a Cold Air Installed on his. My Cobalt SS/SC is Bone Stock. He couldn't beleive it. He wants me to race his friend with a 02 Stock GT. After reading all of these discussions I know I have a good chance in beating him.
Old 02-08-2007, 11:19 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Blainestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-19-05
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pvirga88
I haven't had an experience with a GT yet. but I raced a V6.
I gave him about 3 to 4 cars to make him feel special at first then I creeped up an him and passed him like he was standing still. He couldn't catch me after that. I had to slow down to about 100 mph just to let him catch up a bit. We bothed pulled over and was bullshitting for a while. He had a Borla Exhaust and a Cold Air Installed on his. My Cobalt SS/SC is Bone Stock. He couldn't beleive it. He wants me to race his friend with a 02 Stock GT. After reading all of these discussions I know I have a good chance in beating him.
Yeah, you probably have 40-50 whp on a 99-04 5-speed V6 Mustang and a little weight, too.

With regard to the '02 GT, if it's a 5-speed, the GT would have a slight advantage from a dig to ~100, but if you can outdrive him, you can certainly pull it off. If you could get him to go from a roll, you'd be in better shape.

Good luck...
Old 02-08-2007, 11:20 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Waylin22's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-28-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice kill!!11
Old 02-08-2007, 01:01 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
DSMissed's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-31-06
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well also, those Mustangs are older and some probably have a lot of hotrodding miles behind their belt already that might affect their performance

Oh My God....did I just stick up for a Ford? Woah, I've crossed the line now...

Awesome kill, thats my goal car to beat while I'm stock.
Old 02-08-2007, 01:30 PM
  #36  
Member
 
nanaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-23-06
Location: VA
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice kill. the roll certainly tilted the odds in your favor.
Old 02-08-2007, 02:29 PM
  #37  
Banned
 
codyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a dig the 99-04 GT is easy to launch and can easily get a stock SS/SC in the 1/8.

But for some reason all GT's seem to just plain blow from a roll and during high speed action. The SOHC 4.6 in the 99-07 GT is a 1/8 mile engine.

Back when I had my LT1 Firebird the 1999 GT just rolled out and they were eager to play. From a dig it was close with a slight advantage to the LT1, but from a roll the LT1's waste the SOHC 4.6 both my LT1's were autos and one had 2.73 gears too.
Old 02-08-2007, 02:44 PM
  #38  
Member
 
nanaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-23-06
Location: VA
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i'm actually agreeing with you there, cody. new edge GTs are pretty shatty from a roll. my car was such a dog.

i read before you said the power and torque curve sucks in the SOHC. that's actually not completely true. if you grab a dyno printout from a 99-01 cobra or 03/04 mach 1 and put it next to a 99-04GT, the torque curve is much smoother and nicer on the SOHC.
Old 02-08-2007, 03:10 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
chevysalesman614's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: new jersey
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rick1217
Nice kill!
Yeah where I live there are lots of mustangs around, so I get a shot at racing quite a few.... I still havnt lost to one....yet... and have raced a few 99-04 gts from a dig, it is pretty close, but I usally start pulling away around 3rd. I am getting really good at launching this car, I cant wait for the track to open up so I can actually see what I am running though. I have not raced any of the new gt's though, I dont think I will have a chance til I get more mods.
Has anyone raced a new gt?? I am just wondering what the results would be.....dig or roll??
i raced an 06 stock for stock at the track and got powned by a full second. he ran 13.7@ 102 i think, and i ran 14.7 @ 97

Originally Posted by codyss
From a dig the 99-04 GT is easy to launch and can easily get a stock SS/SC in the 1/8.

But for some reason all GT's seem to just plain blow from a roll and during high speed action. The SOHC 4.6 in the 99-07 GT is a 1/8 mile engine.

Back when I had my LT1 Firebird the 1999 GT just rolled out and they were eager to play. From a dig it was close with a slight advantage to the LT1, but from a roll the LT1's waste the SOHC 4.6 both my LT1's were autos and one had 2.73 gears too.
i dont know what engine comes in an 06 gt,but that was no 1/8 mile car man.. he just kept walking away down the track

Last edited by chevysalesman614; 02-08-2007 at 03:10 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 02-08-2007, 04:40 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
8cd03gro's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by codyss
From a dig the 99-04 GT is easy to launch and can easily get a stock SS/SC in the 1/8.

But for some reason all GT's seem to just plain blow from a roll and during high speed action. The SOHC 4.6 in the 99-07 GT is a 1/8 mile engine.

Back when I had my LT1 Firebird the 1999 GT just rolled out and they were eager to play. From a dig it was close with a slight advantage to the LT1, but from a roll the LT1's waste the SOHC 4.6 both my LT1's were autos and one had 2.73 gears too.
dude you really need to do some reading before you say stuff like this. s197's 4.6 = 3 valve, totally different engine.
Old 02-08-2007, 08:00 PM
  #41  
Member
 
nanaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-23-06
Location: VA
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro
dude you really need to do some reading before you say stuff like this. s197's 4.6 = 3 valve, totally different engine.
it's a 3v SOHC
Old 02-08-2007, 08:20 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
8cd03gro's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nanaki
it's a 3v SOHC
"The SOHC 4.6 in the 99-07 GT is a 1/8 mile engine"

"THE" and "A" = singular and the 4.6 in the s197 is very different from the 4.6 in the new edge's.


that is what i was talking about.
Old 02-08-2007, 09:31 PM
  #43  
Member
 
nanaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-23-06
Location: VA
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro
"The SOHC 4.6 in the 99-07 GT is a 1/8 mile engine"

"THE" and "A" = singular and the 4.6 in the s197 is very different from the 4.6 in the new edge's.


that is what i was talking about.
my bad. i thought you were saying it isn't a SOHC. i didn't see the part where cody was putting all the motors in the same little circle. it's more like 96-04, not 99-07.
Old 02-08-2007, 09:38 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
8cd03gro's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nanaki
my bad. i thought you were saying it isn't a SOHC. i didn't see the part where cody was putting all the motors in the same little circle. it's more like 96-04, not 99-07.
99+ had the pi heads tho.

im just trying to keep the facts straight. the new 4.6 is very different from the old one, and the new 4.0 is nothing like the old 3.8....at all.
Old 02-08-2007, 09:41 PM
  #45  
Member
 
nanaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-23-06
Location: VA
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i know it had PI, but other than that, it's the same engine. PI swap a 96-98, and you get the same power (actually a little more).

yeah, i know what you were saying now. i didn't really read into it like i should have. the 3v is a completely different mammal.
Old 02-08-2007, 10:03 PM
  #46  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Freakenhye's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-15-07
Location: Van Nuys
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blainestang
Yeah, you probably have 40-50 whp on a 99-04 5-speed V6 Mustang and a little weight, too.

With regard to the '02 GT, if it's a 5-speed, the GT would have a slight advantage from a dig to ~100, but if you can outdrive him, you can certainly pull it off. If you could get him to go from a roll, you'd be in better shape.

Good luck...


The guy i raced was a five speed. And i whipped his ass like he was 2 yearls old and got cought with his hand in my cookie jar.
Old 02-09-2007, 01:10 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Blainestang's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-19-05
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Freakenhye
The guy i raced was a five speed. And i whipped his ass like he was 2 yearls old and got cought with his hand in my cookie jar.
Yeah, anything can happen... and it does.

However, the 99-04 5-speed GT is capable of slightly faster 1/4 mile times than an SS/SC is when you're talking stock vs. stock.
Old 02-09-2007, 05:26 PM
  #48  
Banned
 
codyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys I know the S197 4.6 was a 3V SOHC.

But like the 99-04 SOHC it lacks power from a roll.
Old 02-09-2007, 05:31 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
yellowcobaltss05's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-20-05
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mustangs are slow unless they are blown. I raced one with full exhaust(header, x-pipe), intake and a tune and i walked him from a dig after i got traction.
Old 02-09-2007, 08:55 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
8cd03gro's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by yellowcobaltss05
mustangs are slow unless they are blown. I raced one with full exhaust(header, x-pipe), intake and a tune and i walked him from a dig after i got traction.
tell that to a lightly modded mach 1.


Quick Reply: 03 Mustang GT Got owned.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:24 AM.