War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

06 S/C vs 300c SRT-8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2007, 03:38 PM
  #201  
Senior Member
 
djcasper_bpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-16-06
Location: wyoming
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
home girl must not know how to drive. i took on an srt8 a few months ago.. sweet ass ride. he had me the whole way...

Engine: 6.1L OHV V-8, 425 hp, 420 lb-ft
Drive: Rear-wheel
0-60 mph: 5.0 sec
Top speed: 165 mph

and that out of the box, no mods...
Old 01-23-2007, 06:48 PM
  #202  
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-06
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 15,732
Received 410 Likes on 352 Posts
Originally Posted by djcasper_bpm
home girl must not know how to drive. i took on an srt8 a few months ago.. sweet ass ride. he had me the whole way...

Engine: 6.1L OHV V-8, 425 hp, 420 lb-ft
Drive: Rear-wheel
0-60 mph: 5.0 sec
Top speed: 165 mph

and that out of the box, no mods...
We are all waiting for the Snow to melt here... so i can video me racing my Friends...

And What are your mods... this makes a big difference.
Old 01-23-2007, 07:17 PM
  #203  
Banned
 
codyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by USMCFieldMP
A Mullet was never my thing!

What kind of stupid BS is that?

Put a 2006 SS/SC beside a 2006 GTO or late model Camaro SS 9 out of 10 will pick the GTO or F-Body.

Ugly ass sedans like the STi and EVO are a joke.
Old 01-23-2007, 07:21 PM
  #204  
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-06
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 15,732
Received 410 Likes on 352 Posts
Originally Posted by codyss
What kind of stupid BS is that?

Put a 2006 SS/SC beside a 2006 GTO or late model Camaro SS 9 out of 10 will pick the GTO or F-Body.

Ugly ass sedans like the STi and EVO are a joke.
Easy Mullet-man... no need to get all grumpy! Yeah... 9 out of 10 mullet-men will pick a GTO or F-body... that is very true! And Evo's and STi's are far from a Joke. Your statement of 9 out of 10 was a joke. Yes, they are nice cars... but they aren't THAT damn nice. I'd take a Stock Evo over a 900rwhp GTO or Camaro ANY DAY!
Old 01-23-2007, 07:22 PM
  #205  
p7x
Senior Member
 
p7x's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-15-05
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by codyss
What kind of stupid BS is that?

Put a 2006 SS/SC beside a 2006 GTO or late model Camaro SS 9 out of 10 will pick the GTO or F-Body.

Ugly ass sedans like the STi and EVO are a joke.
No offense dude but it's globally known camaros not somuch GTO's just scream mullet mobile. In fact when the first news of the 2009 camaro broke into the public C&D's first article started "With enough time grows their mullets back the hardcore muscle fans will be able to buy the new camaro in 2009"
Old 01-23-2007, 07:31 PM
  #206  
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-06
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 15,732
Received 410 Likes on 352 Posts



Last edited by USMCFieldMP; 01-23-2007 at 07:31 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 01-23-2007, 07:31 PM
  #207  
Banned
 
e-thug43v3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-19-07
Location: kern county
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by codyss
What kind of stupid BS is that?

Put a 2006 SS/SC beside a 2006 GTO or late model Camaro SS 9 out of 10 will pick the GTO or F-Body.

Ugly ass sedans like the STi and EVO are a joke.
"The new GTO handles like is has flat tires"
Old 01-23-2007, 07:37 PM
  #208  
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-06
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 15,732
Received 410 Likes on 352 Posts
I used to own a picture of a bunch of guys with mullets standing around one of the new camaro's at the Auto show... it was classic. But i can't find it.
Old 01-24-2007, 11:07 AM
  #209  
Banned
 
codyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by e-thug43v3r
"The new GTO handles like is has flat tires"
You do realize your wrong right?

Most people who drive them and come to this conclusion don't know what it means to power oversteer or they are used to taking the same corner slower in there lowered ricer. It's kinda like when I went from a RWD Camaro to my SS/SC.

The SS/SC is the best balanced FWD I have driven but you cannot generalize handling characteristics between FWD, RWD and AWD. Like people they all have specific triats that make them different. With that being said it takes the least amount of experience to make the AWD peform, that being why ricers worldwide praise them.

I would put my GTO's handling between my 2002 Camaro SS and 2000 Camaro SS with SLP suspension option.


As for the mullet comments why is it that 90% comes from ricers or tuners? Are they upset that a 1998 Z28 can run there 2005 STi into the ground? Pretty dumb generalization if you ask me.
Old 01-24-2007, 11:10 AM
  #210  
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-06
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 15,732
Received 410 Likes on 352 Posts
No... i say it because it is funny.

Old 01-24-2007, 11:13 AM
  #211  
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-06
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 15,732
Received 410 Likes on 352 Posts
When most people try and think of what a redneck drives... they either think of a big truck... or a Camaro/Trans Am. But I'm just playing with you man. While I never liked the Camaro (Except for the Classic late 60's)... I always seemed to like the Trans Am's.


Old 01-24-2007, 03:20 PM
  #212  
Banned
 
codyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like I said e-troll AWD can be driven easier by people like you. AWD will pull you around a short tight track quicker but on a open road handling is no better than a F-Body or GTO.

I would love to see you put money on a STi/EVO vs LS1 F-Body race. I shut up alot of people in EVO's and STi's in my Camaro SS's. My GTO will lay waste to them just as easy.

A 1998-2002 F-Body/2005-2006 GTO will run the same times and at higher trap speeds.

You seem like the kind of guy who likes to quote best times or internet bullshit for the STi/EVO which are far from average. If you knew anything at all you would realize how flawed your thinking is.

As for roll racing I don't really do that alot since I now have a car with RWD and torque.

But since you brought it up a roll race between a stock LS1 F-Body/LS2 GTO and a STi/EVO is quite funny.
Old 01-24-2007, 04:44 PM
  #213  
Member
 
dennyt4's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-30-06
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by codyss
Like I said e-troll AWD can be driven easier by people like you. AWD will pull you around a short tight track quicker but on a open road handling is no better than a F-Body or GTO.

I would love to see you put money on a STi/EVO vs LS1 F-Body race. I shut up alot of people in EVO's and STi's in my Camaro SS's. My GTO will lay waste to them just as easy.

A 1998-2002 F-Body/2005-2006 GTO will run the same times and at higher trap speeds.

You seem like the kind of guy who likes to quote best times or internet bullshit for the STi/EVO which are far from average. If you knew anything at all you would realize how flawed your thinking is.

As for roll racing I don't really do that alot since I now have a car with RWD and torque.

But since you brought it up a roll race between a stock LS1 F-Body/LS2 GTO and a STi/EVO is quite funny.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

First of all, WTF is "open road handling"??? You mean going in a straight line?? Yeah, I will give you that much - both cars will "handle" the same in a straight line.

And a 98-92 F-body runs the same times as your GTO? Then why waste the money on that new POS? LOL There are plenty of guys around here that I have embarrassed in their Camaros or Trans Ams that would have been willing to sell you their cars and saved you some cash.

I do agree that a roll race between F-body/GTO and my Evo will be quite funny, but certainly not the way you believe.

You find a track 1/2 way between Nebraska and PA and I'll be glad to meet you this summer and we can see what happens if you want. Loser pays for winner's gas, that way it won't cost me anything LOL
Old 01-24-2007, 07:58 PM
  #214  
New Member
 
STIwannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-20-06
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread is getting good!!!!
Old 01-24-2007, 10:04 PM
  #215  
Senior Member
 
arng22's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-02-06
Location: Hopatcong
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how is this arguement working? really?

stock for stock...
1/4 mile would be a good race..thats a toss up
then we come to a turn small little "s" turn...whoops...AWD FTW...good by camarro
wait then the camarro rolls back up...same roughly the same hp, with 1000lb weight difference, once again, sorry camarro

you gotta stop whatching those chevy commericals man THIS IS OUR COUNTRY!
nice cars..but not just to beat, but to **** on an STI/EVO? nope
Old 01-24-2007, 10:47 PM
  #216  
Senior Member
 
8cd03gro's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
codyss will never admit that anything is faster in any way than an ls_ equipped car. just stop arguing it.
Old 01-25-2007, 01:12 AM
  #217  
New Member
 
mustangsrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-25-07
Location: here
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...lol this his hilarious. You realize how youd have to have added another at least 100 flywheel hp to your car to make it even comparable to that, but wouldnt have nearly enough torque to take that. Muscle versus coffee cans... not happening. Would you be able to beat me in a race...I bet according to your standards you could....not possible



__________________________________________________ _______________________
2007 Mustang Shelby GT500
492.6 dynoed RWHP
11.72 second 1/4 mile
Old 01-25-2007, 01:22 AM
  #218  
Senior Member
 
boostbalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-06
Location: Canada
Posts: 862
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
GT500 lol, grow up man, it's a 4 banger..
Old 01-25-2007, 09:06 AM
  #219  
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-06
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 15,732
Received 410 Likes on 352 Posts
Wow... this thread got taken over by a couple trolls! And as a matter of fact... from a roll... a Slightly modded SS/SC can take an SRT-8. If you want, I can give you the E-mail address of my buddy who owns an SRT-4, SRT-8, STi, and a Procharged Camaro. I've raced him many a time in his SRT-4, so he know's what I've got.

Originally Posted by SRTfellie
There really is no point in to a 75 roll.. we both get traction by then, i want to go from a 20 roll if we race. the srt8 is 4200 lbs so im expecting you to win.. id hope so haha.. but about at 80 the 6.1 falls on its face.
He's not even interested in a 75 roll, because the car doesn't move well after that! Don't worry... We'll have it on film soon enough!
Old 01-25-2007, 09:26 AM
  #220  
New Member
 
Strychnine's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-18-07
Location: Albany, GA
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by USMCFieldMP
Wow... this thread got taken over by a couple trolls! And as a matter of fact... from a roll... a Slightly modded SS/SC can take an SRT-8. If you want, I can give you the E-mail address of my buddy who owns an SRT-4, SRT-8, STi, and a Procharged Camaro. Don't worry... We'll have it on film soon enough!


What do you define as a "slightly modded" SS/SC? I consider "slightly modded" to be things like intake and exhaust. If you include things like Stage 2 and more in "slightly modded", then I can see that possibly happening. SRT-8's are a driver's race with my car, and I don't imagine SS/SC's with intake and exhaust are in my neighborhood.
Old 01-25-2007, 09:56 AM
  #221  
Banned
 
codyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by arng22
how is this arguement working? really?

stock for stock...
1/4 mile would be a good race..thats a toss up
then we come to a turn small little "s" turn...whoops...AWD FTW...good by camarro
wait then the camarro rolls back up...same roughly the same hp, with 1000lb weight difference, once again, sorry camarro

you gotta stop whatching those chevy commericals man THIS IS OUR COUNTRY!
nice cars..but not just to beat, but to **** on an STI/EVO? nope
You don't really think a F-Body weighs 1000lbs more than a STi/EVO do you? My GTO doesn't even weigh 1000lbs more than a STi/EVO.

Some of you need to get the facts before you talk about LS1/LS2 powered vehicles. Stock vs stock they will dominate a STi/EVO. Unless the race is on a track with no straights and a corner every 100 yards.
Old 01-25-2007, 01:23 PM
  #222  
Senior Member
 
SS4ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-13-05
Location: WI
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mustangsrule
...lol this his hilarious. You realize how youd have to have added another at least 100 flywheel hp to your car to make it even comparable to that, but wouldnt have nearly enough torque to take that. Muscle versus coffee cans... not happening. Would you be able to beat me in a race...I bet according to your standards you could....not possible



__________________________________________________ _______________________
2007 Mustang Shelby GT500
492.6 dynoed RWHP
11.72 second 1/4 mile


You must not have heard of power to weight ratios?

BTW, if you want to make a sig. do it on your USER CP not on your posts!

Also while the SRT-8 may be a muscle car, your Rustang is not. Brush up on your history before you TROLL!
Old 01-25-2007, 02:27 PM
  #223  
Banned
 
codyss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you for the good laugh mustangsrule

Sorry pall but your overweight brick of a GT500 doesn't run 11.72, try mid 12's with a good driver pal.
Old 01-25-2007, 02:33 PM
  #224  
New Member
 
Strychnine's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-18-07
Location: Albany, GA
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by codyss
Thank you for the good laugh mustangsrule

Sorry pall but your overweight brick of a GT500 doesn't run 11.72, try mid 12's with a good driver pal.


Now now Cody, you know us GTO guys are in no position to be accusing any car of being overweight.
Old 01-25-2007, 03:31 PM
  #225  
Senior Member
 
SS4ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-13-05
Location: WI
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by codyss
Thank you for the good laugh mustangsrule

Sorry pall but your overweight brick of a GT500 doesn't run 11.72, try mid 12's with a good driver pal.
I've heard of the new GT500 running high 11's stock!

Did you read on MSN about Ford losing a Rustang a minute?

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com....aspx?GT1=8995


Quick Reply: 06 S/C vs 300c SRT-8



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 AM.