06 SS S/C vs. 00 S2000
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-04-05
Location: LongIsland
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by codyss
Oh I can see, I just am not one of those people who throw times around like nothing.
If a couple people beat the hell out of a car all day long and run a 13.90 aut most others see 14.4 that by no means makes the car a 13 second car.
If a couple people beat the hell out of a car all day long and run a 13.90 aut most others see 14.4 that by no means makes the car a 13 second car.
#55
You guys need to focus on trap speed, not the ET time. Trap speed shows the power/weight ratio of a car. ET time is almost always a result of the launch/grip. S2000 trap between 97-100...so does the Cobalt. From my experience with both, the S2000 will win with a hard launch mostly from the fact it's rear wheel drive, but the Cobalt will win slightly from a roll because of its torque spread. Because the S2000 is rwd, it generally gets slightly better 1/4 times.
#58
So basically,
Which ever car has the better driver from a dig will win. From a roll the Cobalt has a clear advantage and will easily match the top end of the S2000. But I know people who suck at roll racing too so the driver will matter there also.
Keep in mind that is when compared to the updated S2000, they changed engine a little (cams) in last years model it lost a little top end HP but gained low end TQ. The earlier model S2000 will lose from a dig or roll.
Which ever car has the better driver from a dig will win. From a roll the Cobalt has a clear advantage and will easily match the top end of the S2000. But I know people who suck at roll racing too so the driver will matter there also.
Keep in mind that is when compared to the updated S2000, they changed engine a little (cams) in last years model it lost a little top end HP but gained low end TQ. The earlier model S2000 will lose from a dig or roll.
#59
Originally Posted by phxSS
Who cares. I'd still rather own a Mustang
#60
Originally Posted by ralliartist
i guess that means that the cobalt ss s/c is a 15 sec car for most people then. lol. (puts flame suit on)
I said before and I will say it again: Do the race, no bets, just run for fun. If you can post a video regardless of the outcome.
I hate how these threads turn into huge arguements. A race isn't all about the car, it is about the driver and how they control the car.
If you want to race someone, don't ask if you will win, just go out there and do it. Who cares if you lose? Don't get me wrong, I love the feeling of victory, but you have to be able to accept that there is always someone bigger and better out there.
If you don't like what you read, you don't have to read it again. Move on to the next thread and don't attack or belittle the person/s posting. Read the top of the main page. "our mission is to provide a friendly atmosphere for all members and visitors of this network." By attacking or belittleing people you are defeating the goal of the site: to meet people with a common interest and seek advice/help on stuff.
That is the end of my rant.
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-20-05
Location: North Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the s2000 is only 210 to the wheels. i have raced one and it was very close, i only had half a car on him from a dig(no roll race). now... if your friend knows how to launch it right and he is a good driver you might have some catching up to do. who knows what will happen...
#62
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 11-15-05
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
looks like tonight might be the night. geeez...at this point I just wanna see how it turns out. not sure if i can get a video because I can't get a hold of a vid. camera...but I'll see what I can do.
#63
Originally Posted by wesmanw02
Hehe yea definitely. I can't stand cars that don't have any *****. The Ford 4.6 V8 would turn an S2K engine backwards
I disagree. I have beaten a lot of 4.6 mustang's. And the honda s2000 is pretty much just as fat as our cars are. So i think i stock s2000 can take a stock 4.6 mustang. But 100 bucks on it.
#64
Originally Posted by Mines_Better
the s2000 is only 210 to the wheels. i have raced one and it was very close, i only had half a car on him from a dig(no roll race). now... if your friend knows how to launch it right and he is a good driver you might have some catching up to do. who knows what will happen...
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-04-05
Location: LongIsland
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GotBoost?
How much TQ to the wheels do they have? Kinda funny because a guy around town just traded in his honda civic for a s2000 and i want to race him bad! I live in a small town, and i can say that i have the fastest 4 cyl in my town. I want to make sure that this is true.
#67
Senior Member
Platinum Member
Originally Posted by GotBoost?
How much TQ to the wheels do they have? Kinda funny because a guy around town just traded in his honda civic for a s2000 and i want to race him bad! I live in a small town, and i can say that i have the fastest 4 cyl in my town. I want to make sure that this is true.
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-04-05
Location: LongIsland
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by phxSS
I think if you can get a better launch, you'll take an S2000 from a dig. IF anything THEY will have the harder time launching due to horrible torque.
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-20-05
Location: North Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok my buddy with a s2000 dynoed his at 202whp@8300 rpm's. his torque was 147lb/ft@7500 rpm's. this is all stock. there are some numbers for you to go off of besides the ones that you find online. factor in the weight(which i dont know), and you have a pretty good idea of what a race will be like. against a skilled s2000 driver, from a dig, it will be very close, like a few tenths of a sec. difference. i agree with the gearing comment about the s2000. that with RWD will make it a contender for sure.
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-04-05
Location: LongIsland
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mines_Better
ok my buddy with a s2000 dynoed his at 202whp@8300 rpm's. his torque was 147lb/ft@7500 rpm's. this is all stock. there are some numbers for you to go off of besides the ones that you find online. factor in the weight(which i dont know), and you have a pretty good idea of what a race will be like. against a skilled s2000 driver, from a dig, it will be very close, like a few tenths of a sec. difference. i agree with the gearing comment about the s2000. that with RWD will make it a contender for sure.
#71
Originally Posted by Darksun280
Yeah honda can catch you off guarf with there power numbers. Cars look like poo on paper but then there gearing, weight, and stock wheel sizes come into play and they do alright.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post