2.4SS vs. 99-02 cav Z24
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 11-01-05
Location: San Antonio,TX
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2.4SS vs. 99-02 cav Z24
Well me and my friend were leaving the usual gathering spot friday night and we were rolling down the highway and we came upon a stretch of open road my friend yelled to me if I wanna run since there was no traffic and I said "sure why the hell not." So we were rolling at around 60mph and we both pretty much gunned it at the same time. we stayed dead even until 90mph and I start pulling him, not by much though then we shut off at 100. I was pretty amazed it was that close. All he has is an Intake and thats it. Anyone know how much hp and torque the 2.4 twin cam push out? Also he is auto and all my mods are in my sig.
#2
wow, thats pretty impressive for the cavy. although i have a friend w/ a base cavy w/ intake/ exhaust running mid 15's in the 1/4. idk about a Z24 tho, i thought they had like 150 hp and like 155 lb tq
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 11-01-05
Location: San Antonio,TX
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I did a little research and I found this on one site:
http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z188/default.aspx
Year 2000
Make Chevrolet
Model Cavalier Z24
Weight 2838 lbs | 1287.3 kg
Performance
0-60 mph 8.6 seconds.
Engine
Engine Configuration I
Cylinders 4
Aspiration/Induction Normal
Displacement 2.40 L | 146.4 cu in. | 2399.5 cc.
Valvetrain DOHC
Horsepower 150.00 BHP (110.4 KW) @ 5600.00 RPM
Torque 155.00 Ft-Lbs (210.2 NM) @ 4400.00 RPM
HP to Weight Ratio 18.9 LB / HP
HP / Liter 62.5 BHP / Liter
AND: http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/d...ptionalEngines
Year 2006
Make Chevrolet
Model Cobalt
Engine Location Front
Drive Type Front Wheel
Weight 2780 lbs | 1261 kg
Engine Configuration I
Cylinders 4
Aspiration/Induction Normal
Displacement 2384.00 cc | 145.5 cu in. | 2.4 L.
Valves 16 valves.
4 valves per cylinder.
Valvetrain DOHC
Horsepower 171.00 BHP (125.9 KW) @ 6200.00 RPM
Torque 163.00 Ft-Lbs (221 NM) @ 5000.00 RPM
HP to Weight Ratio 16.3 LB / HP
HP / Liter 71.3 BHP / Liter
Redline 6750
Bore 3.46 in | 87.9 mm. | 0.1 m.
Stroke 3.85 in | 97.8 mm. | 0.1 m.
Compression Ratio 10.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Petrol
Block Cast-iron
Head Aluminum
http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z188/default.aspx
Year 2000
Make Chevrolet
Model Cavalier Z24
Weight 2838 lbs | 1287.3 kg
Performance
0-60 mph 8.6 seconds.
Engine
Engine Configuration I
Cylinders 4
Aspiration/Induction Normal
Displacement 2.40 L | 146.4 cu in. | 2399.5 cc.
Valvetrain DOHC
Horsepower 150.00 BHP (110.4 KW) @ 5600.00 RPM
Torque 155.00 Ft-Lbs (210.2 NM) @ 4400.00 RPM
HP to Weight Ratio 18.9 LB / HP
HP / Liter 62.5 BHP / Liter
AND: http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/d...ptionalEngines
Year 2006
Make Chevrolet
Model Cobalt
Engine Location Front
Drive Type Front Wheel
Weight 2780 lbs | 1261 kg
Engine Configuration I
Cylinders 4
Aspiration/Induction Normal
Displacement 2384.00 cc | 145.5 cu in. | 2.4 L.
Valves 16 valves.
4 valves per cylinder.
Valvetrain DOHC
Horsepower 171.00 BHP (125.9 KW) @ 6200.00 RPM
Torque 163.00 Ft-Lbs (221 NM) @ 5000.00 RPM
HP to Weight Ratio 16.3 LB / HP
HP / Liter 71.3 BHP / Liter
Redline 6750
Bore 3.46 in | 87.9 mm. | 0.1 m.
Stroke 3.85 in | 97.8 mm. | 0.1 m.
Compression Ratio 10.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Petrol
Block Cast-iron
Head Aluminum
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-30-06
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 5,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dragonsfire12345
Well I did a little research and I found this on one site:
http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z188/default.aspx
Year 2000
Make Chevrolet
Model Cavalier Z24
Weight 2838 lbs | 1287.3 kg
Performance
0-60 mph 8.6 seconds.
Engine
Engine Configuration I
Cylinders 4
Aspiration/Induction Normal
Displacement 2.40 L | 146.4 cu in. | 2399.5 cc.
Valvetrain DOHC
Horsepower 150.00 BHP (110.4 KW) @ 5600.00 RPM
Torque 155.00 Ft-Lbs (210.2 NM) @ 4400.00 RPM
HP to Weight Ratio 18.9 LB / HP
HP / Liter 62.5 BHP / Liter
http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z188/default.aspx
Year 2000
Make Chevrolet
Model Cavalier Z24
Weight 2838 lbs | 1287.3 kg
Performance
0-60 mph 8.6 seconds.
Engine
Engine Configuration I
Cylinders 4
Aspiration/Induction Normal
Displacement 2.40 L | 146.4 cu in. | 2399.5 cc.
Valvetrain DOHC
Horsepower 150.00 BHP (110.4 KW) @ 5600.00 RPM
Torque 155.00 Ft-Lbs (210.2 NM) @ 4400.00 RPM
HP to Weight Ratio 18.9 LB / HP
HP / Liter 62.5 BHP / Liter
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-01-06
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bone stock, the Z24 LD9 2.4 could run 15.8-16.0 average. Fastest bone stock was a 15.2 factory freak.
There is a noticable power difference between the 2.4 LD9 and the 2.4 VVT. My 96 Sunflower GT had a Ractive intake, high flow cat and mufflers and while those mods really woke up the highway performance, third gear still didn't pull anywhere near as hard as what my G5 does stock.
There is a noticable power difference between the 2.4 LD9 and the 2.4 VVT. My 96 Sunflower GT had a Ractive intake, high flow cat and mufflers and while those mods really woke up the highway performance, third gear still didn't pull anywhere near as hard as what my G5 does stock.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-10-05
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont know man but i raced my share of z24s with my old 04 cav auto.. they beat me off the line but i ended up pulling on them at higher rpms.. and i was stock, dont know about the z.. race him from a stop and see who will win .. autos dont like racing from a roll specially between 50-60.
#13
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
I raced one of these last night in my manual 2.4 i was pulling the entire time but they wernt far behind. they had exhaust and intake... so did i, but i won, still close though. it was fast enough to hang but not pull on me. i was kinda playing with her too i didnt really try my hardest, but it was still a good race
#14
wanna race my z24? lol yeah 2.4 cavys run stock at 150hp which to the wheels is only like 130ish was what mine dyno'd at stock. i ran a 15.9 stock but with a intake you can get them into mid 15's.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-10-05
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dragonsfire12345
thanks for the info I'll have to race him from a dig and see what happens also.
#20
Ha! My girl had a late 80s Z24...
I have the 2.0 SC and she was definitely going 0-60 in some where around 7 sec...
The first time I lined up with her she warned me and told me she took it to the track once when she was 17 and wasted a riced out eclipse... made the guy pretty pissed...
Any how I underestimated it went half throttle and off the line she had me pretty good... not until about half way through second gear did I pass her...
The Z24s were worthy of that badge!
I have the 2.0 SC and she was definitely going 0-60 in some where around 7 sec...
The first time I lined up with her she warned me and told me she took it to the track once when she was 17 and wasted a riced out eclipse... made the guy pretty pissed...
Any how I underestimated it went half throttle and off the line she had me pretty good... not until about half way through second gear did I pass her...
The Z24s were worthy of that badge!
#21
The rear wheel drive on hers seemed to have helped a ton and it was a V6 not a 4...
After that first time running her I never took it easy again but she would always have me right at first... damn wheel hop.
After that first time running her I never took it easy again but she would always have me right at first... damn wheel hop.
#23
Originally Posted by JackD
Ha! My girl had a late 80s Z24...
I have the 2.0 SC and she was definitely going 0-60 in some where around 7 sec...
The first time I lined up with her she warned me and told me she took it to the track once when she was 17 and wasted a riced out eclipse... made the guy pretty pissed...
Any how I underestimated it went half throttle and off the line she had me pretty good... not until about half way through second gear did I pass her...
The Z24s were worthy of that badge!
I have the 2.0 SC and she was definitely going 0-60 in some where around 7 sec...
The first time I lined up with her she warned me and told me she took it to the track once when she was 17 and wasted a riced out eclipse... made the guy pretty pissed...
Any how I underestimated it went half throttle and off the line she had me pretty good... not until about half way through second gear did I pass her...
The Z24s were worthy of that badge!
#24
It was definitely rear wheel drive man... it was OLD! It didn't share a single part with our cars like ^^^ that guy said... it was a totally different car... but I still say they were worthy of the badge Z24 just like the 2.4 ecotec is worthy of the SS badge.
They were never 'fast' cars but they would hang with the competition...
They were never 'fast' cars but they would hang with the competition...