2.5L Turbo Subi Legacy vs 2003 Celica GT RIcer
12-13-2008, 03:44 AM
#26
Member
Join Date: 11-11-06
Location: VaBeach
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think your mistaken.. you are probably thinking about the GT (140hp at the crank). we can go back and forth with this... i can refer you to a sight and you can refer this and that.. i haven't seen a 400+whp cobalt ss/sc not even a vid of one but i've seen a 640whp celica GT-S
12-13-2008, 03:47 AM
#27
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 06-03-07
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 24,280
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
i think your mistaken.. you are probably thinking about the GT (140hp at the crank). we can go back and forth with this... i can refer you to a sight and you can refer this and that.. i haven't seen a 400+whp cobalt ss/sc not even a vid of one but i've seen a 640whp celica GT-S
cool, pat yourself on the back for seeing a 640 WHP celica gt-s. means celicas are better then all cobalts in the world.
spend more time on this site and you will find a few 400+ horsepower Cobalt SS
stock for stock a ss/sc would beat a GTS...no question..your comparing a 215 WHP car to a 160 WHP car.
but hey...people once thought a 2.4SS could take a 2.0
12-13-2008, 03:58 AM
#28
Member
Join Date: 11-11-06
Location: VaBeach
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
in no way am i saying that celicas are better than cobalts. i'm just stating that a good gt-s driver will hang and/or beat a ss/sc. of course this is stock to stock. put mods in the mix it all depends on who's pockets are deeper. and believe me the celica isn't cheap!! i'm 13k invested from parts and labor but i'll save that for another thread..
12-13-2008, 04:00 AM
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 06-03-07
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 24,280
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
in no way am i saying that celicas are better than cobalts. i'm just stating that a good gt-s driver will hang and/or beat a ss/sc. of course this is stock to stock. put mods in the mix it all depends on who's pockets are deeper. and believe me the celica isn't cheap!! i'm 13k invested from parts and labor but i'll save that for another thread..
a stock ss/sc vs a celica gt-s. same drivers in both situations, the ss/sc will win everytime, i can promise you that.
im not bias, im usally the first to admit when/what will beat a cobalt...but your GTS will not. sorry mate, you can keep beating a dead horse..but your not going to get anywere
12-13-2008, 04:07 AM
#30
Member
Join Date: 11-11-06
Location: VaBeach
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
be more opened minded please, celica's are not gods, learn to know what they can beat and what they cant, dont base this off of one time happenings.
a stock ss/sc vs a celica gt-s. same drivers in both situations, the ss/sc will win everytime, i can promise you that.
im not bias, im usally the first to admit when/what will beat a cobalt...but your GTS will not. sorry mate, you can keep beating a dead horse..but your not going to get anywere
a stock ss/sc vs a celica gt-s. same drivers in both situations, the ss/sc will win everytime, i can promise you that.
im not bias, im usally the first to admit when/what will beat a cobalt...but your GTS will not. sorry mate, you can keep beating a dead horse..but your not going to get anywere
12-13-2008, 03:56 PM
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-15-06
Location: Cyber Space
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
noo im not mistaken ok thanks. i meant the GTS like you said puts down what...160 WHP? 2.4L cobalts put that down stock..woohoo.
cool, pat yourself on the back for seeing a 640 WHP celica gt-s. means celicas are better then all cobalts in the world.
spend more time on this site and you will find a few 400+ horsepower Cobalt SS- lolz.
stock for stock a ss/sc would beat a GTS...no question..your comparing a 215 WHP car to a 160 WHP car.
but hey...people once thought a 2.4SS could take a 2.0
cool, pat yourself on the back for seeing a 640 WHP celica gt-s. means celicas are better then all cobalts in the world.
spend more time on this site and you will find a few 400+ horsepower Cobalt SS- lolz.
stock for stock a ss/sc would beat a GTS...no question..your comparing a 215 WHP car to a 160 WHP car.
but hey...people once thought a 2.4SS could take a 2.0
12-13-2008, 04:02 PM
#32
New Member
Join Date: 12-08-08
Location: michigan
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He is right, you are wrong. The GT-S is a 2600-2700 pound car correct? Like you said it puts down about 160fwhp stock. Most cobalt ss supercharged's put down a little over 200fwhp stock. a 40fwhp advantage will not be outweighed by 300 pounds when the ss has a flatter torque curve on top of the major power advantage. A GT-S will not trap 100MPH.
12-13-2008, 04:41 PM
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-15-06
Location: Cyber Space
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He is right, you are wrong. The GT-S is a 2600-2700 pound car correct? Like you said it puts down about 160fwhp stock. Most cobalt ss supercharged's put down a little over 200fwhp stock. a 40fwhp advantage will not be outweighed by 300 pounds when the ss has a flatter torque curve on top of the major power advantage. A GT-S will not trap 100MPH.
12-13-2008, 04:52 PM
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-15-06
Location: Cyber Space
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-13-2008, 05:00 PM
#36
Senior Member
yeah, i've never had an issue with a gt-s in my 2.4.
i'm not saying that they can't be quick, but i don't think that they could regularly whoop an SC. that said, i beat a shelby GT in my car...
i'm not saying that they can't be quick, but i don't think that they could regularly whoop an SC. that said, i beat a shelby GT in my car...
12-13-2008, 05:21 PM
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-15-06
Location: Cyber Space
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-13-2008, 11:59 PM
#40
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 06-03-07
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 24,280
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
He is right, you are wrong. The GT-S is a 2600-2700 pound car correct? Like you said it puts down about 160fwhp stock. Most cobalt ss supercharged's put down a little over 200fwhp stock. a 40fwhp advantage will not be outweighed by 300 pounds when the ss has a flatter torque curve on top of the major power advantage. A GT-S will not trap 100MPH.
12-14-2008, 12:55 AM
#41
Member
Join Date: 11-11-06
Location: VaBeach
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-14-2008, 03:37 PM
#44
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 06-03-07
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 24,280
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
btw he blew his turbo last night..lol
Last edited by Projekt; 12-14-2008 at 03:37 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
12-14-2008, 03:43 PM
#45
Member
Join Date: 11-11-06
Location: VaBeach
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GT's or GT-S's??? a GT stand no chance in hell!!! that is a fact. GT-S stand a small fighting chance. that is all. and yes i know a GT-S is a slower car and yes i have delt with that as my mod list shows.
12-15-2008, 12:06 PM
#46
Senior Member
but the fact remains, that day at desoto raceway, i beat a shelby GT in the 1/4 mile.
12-15-2008, 03:12 PM
#48
New Member
Join Date: 10-21-08
Location: Houston
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice kill.
12-16-2008, 09:27 AM
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-13-05
Location: WI
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agreed! Unless the SS/SC owner has issues with driving.