2010 Mustang GT vs 2009 Cobalt SS/TC
#27
Senior Member
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-12-09
Location: milan, ohio
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a 06 manual and it went 13.6 beating it too death. just driving it normal (but hard)
would get me a 14.0. they are faster than 15's lol. stock, they do not go low 13's.
never saw it. maybe a factory freak, but not the norm.
#30
i agree with you. the fastest auto (05-10) i've seen went 14.1. i personally owned
a 06 manual and it went 13.6 beating it too death. just driving it normal (but hard)
would get me a 14.0. they are faster than 15's lol. stock, they do not go low 13's.
never saw it. maybe a factory freak, but not the norm.
a 06 manual and it went 13.6 beating it too death. just driving it normal (but hard)
would get me a 14.0. they are faster than 15's lol. stock, they do not go low 13's.
never saw it. maybe a factory freak, but not the norm.
#31
Senior Member
I have friends with each body style. One with an 07 GT with intake only went 13.3-13,4 all day long on factory rubber. One with a 2010 went 13.2-13.3 all day long bone stock. Only guy I know with an auto has a 11' fully bolted and tuned and he runs 12.0.
The 90's V8 mustangs run 14's guys, now if you're at higher elevation I can see where you're coming from because they would run worse.
The 90's V8 mustangs run 14's guys, now if you're at higher elevation I can see where you're coming from because they would run worse.
#33
OMG. You being a Mustang owner, you would think you would be a little more informed than you are. I guess not. Let me guess, you think the 2011 V6 Mustang is a 15 second car?lol
#34
Senior Member
btw theres a local guy here with a White Mach1 with 03 front bumper and a blower on a stock bottom end... just random seeing another of the exact car.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-17-07
Location: right behind you.
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pretty sure unless it changed you could get 3 different gear ratios , I know on his order form it had 3 different ones listed. Ya he got the middle ration the 3.55 , so not as aggressive as the 3.72. Still a beast any way you look at it. God I love listening to the LS guys ( the camaro / vett / etc guys ) around here talk so much smack on the new mustangs but when it comes down to it ford made a damn good platform.
Last edited by cakeeater; 12-16-2010 at 03:06 PM.
#36
this guy speaks the truth... the 3v cars are heavy and slow... the new 5.0L are pretty effing fast, i guess they realized they needed some variable cam timing and to actually turn the effing motor a few rpm...
btw theres a local guy here with a White Mach1 with 03 front bumper and a blower on a stock bottom end... just random seeing another of the exact car.
btw theres a local guy here with a White Mach1 with 03 front bumper and a blower on a stock bottom end... just random seeing another of the exact car.
#37
I have friends with each body style. One with an 07 GT with intake only went 13.3-13,4 all day long on factory rubber. One with a 2010 went 13.2-13.3 all day long bone stock. Only guy I know with an auto has a 11' fully bolted and tuned and he runs 12.0.
The 90's V8 mustangs run 14's guys, now if you're at higher elevation I can see where you're coming from because they would run worse.
The 90's V8 mustangs run 14's guys, now if you're at higher elevation I can see where you're coming from because they would run worse.
#38
There is a diff between what a car can run and what the driver can run. If the best the car can do is really a 14.9 there is something wrong with it.. What was the trap and 60'..
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-17-07
Location: right behind you.
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went to the track today with my 2011 5.0 6-speed manual. My car is a Premium 400a. Wanted to get some more 11 sec. timeslips, I got 4 off them. Car was hooking pretty good on the stock 19in Pirellis.
Mods:
*Lethal Performance O/R X-pipe
*Flowmaster Axle-Back
*JLT cai
*Revolution Automotive tune
*UPR upper and lower control arms and Panhard Bar
*BMR lowering springs
1st pass: 12.01@118.01 1.85 60ft.
2nd pass: 11.96@117.69 1.79 60ft.
3rd pass: 11.96@116.42 1.81 60ft.
4th pass: 11.97@119.12 1.82 60ft.
5th pass: 11.98@117.09 1.83 60ft.
6th pass: 12.47@117.24 2.22 60ft.
The last run I tried to get to aggressive with the launch and it spun real bad. Was launching at 2500rpm and seemed to hook real good. I cant believe it pulled 119mph and I was excited about the 1.79 60ft. on stock Pirelli tires.
I did make 2 runs with a set of Nitto 555r 18in drag radials that a friend of mine brought to the track with him. I didnt have good success on them, they spun bad, so I switched back to the Pirellies, go figure.
1st pass: 12.14@117.04 1.98 60ft.
2nd pass: 12.28@116.67 2.02 60ft
Ran the 2011 5.0 today, on Pirellis, 11.9's - SVTPerformance
This is what a minor bolt on 5.0 does.
That car would pick up another 20whp from longtubes. A bolt on/tuned ss/tc would get smoked by a full bolt on car in most situations, but against a stock one a tuned/bolted ss/tc should fair pretty well.
Mods:
*Lethal Performance O/R X-pipe
*Flowmaster Axle-Back
*JLT cai
*Revolution Automotive tune
*UPR upper and lower control arms and Panhard Bar
*BMR lowering springs
1st pass: 12.01@118.01 1.85 60ft.
2nd pass: 11.96@117.69 1.79 60ft.
3rd pass: 11.96@116.42 1.81 60ft.
4th pass: 11.97@119.12 1.82 60ft.
5th pass: 11.98@117.09 1.83 60ft.
6th pass: 12.47@117.24 2.22 60ft.
The last run I tried to get to aggressive with the launch and it spun real bad. Was launching at 2500rpm and seemed to hook real good. I cant believe it pulled 119mph and I was excited about the 1.79 60ft. on stock Pirelli tires.
I did make 2 runs with a set of Nitto 555r 18in drag radials that a friend of mine brought to the track with him. I didnt have good success on them, they spun bad, so I switched back to the Pirellies, go figure.
1st pass: 12.14@117.04 1.98 60ft.
2nd pass: 12.28@116.67 2.02 60ft
Ran the 2011 5.0 today, on Pirellis, 11.9's - SVTPerformance
This is what a minor bolt on 5.0 does.
That car would pick up another 20whp from longtubes. A bolt on/tuned ss/tc would get smoked by a full bolt on car in most situations, but against a stock one a tuned/bolted ss/tc should fair pretty well.
#40
Senior Member
#41
yet again at my home track i was running 8.8 1/8 stock then i came down here and ran 9.1 so idk
#43
Senior Member
its a bone stock gt has intake no tune.. its at mir we race for free so we race all the time.. i drove it she drove it her brother drove it.. i race my mach and her brother races his cobra and auto 01 gt(runs 13.7 range) (but full bolton) noone can muster more than 14.9 out of it.. his gt when stock ran 14.8 my best friends auto gt.. yet again 14.9.. all at maryland international raceway.. i loaded the car up in various rpms and still could not get it up there.. sorry but from what i have seen in my personal experiance.. the earlier stangs are not as quick as people claim (THIS IS ONLY AT 1 TRACK)
yet again at my home track i was running 8.8 1/8 stock then i came down here and ran 9.1 so idk
yet again at my home track i was running 8.8 1/8 stock then i came down here and ran 9.1 so idk
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: 01-20-09
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I raced my friends auto 2011. He pulled a good amount. Another one of my friends with an LNF raced a 5.0 and was dead even with him. Mods to the cobalt were catless downpipe, side exit exhaust, tune.
#45
2011 Ford Mustang V-6 First Test - Motor Trend
#46
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Are some of you guys living under a rock? This is a review from the 2011 V6 MUSTANG. Read the last paragraph on page one and tell me about the performance. Seems pretty close to the 370Z to me.
2011 Ford Mustang V-6 First Test - Motor Trend
2011 Ford Mustang V-6 First Test - Motor Trend
the 2011 v6 stang is on par with a DE 350z, but not the HR 350z, and definently not a 370z
#47
#48
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
370z---- 13.3@106
meh, its still a good gap. not to mention some 370's have trapped as high as 109 and ran 13.0. i dont see a stock 2011 v6 stang getting near a 13.0@109.
also, the fastest stock 370z time was 12.8@110.
the 2011 v6 mustang is more comparable to a 03-06 350z. even the 07-08 350z is superior to the v6 stang. (fastest stock 07-08 350z was 13.1@108)
#49
mustang v6--- 13.7@102
370z---- 13.3@106
meh, its still a good gap. not to mention some 370's have trapped as high as 109 and ran 13.0. i dont see a stock 2011 v6 stang getting near a 13.0@109.
also, the fastest stock 370z time was 12.8@110.
the 2011 v6 mustang is more comparable to a 03-06 350z. even the 07-08 350z is superior to the v6 stang. (fastest stock 07-08 350z was 13.1@108)
370z---- 13.3@106
meh, its still a good gap. not to mention some 370's have trapped as high as 109 and ran 13.0. i dont see a stock 2011 v6 stang getting near a 13.0@109.
also, the fastest stock 370z time was 12.8@110.
the 2011 v6 mustang is more comparable to a 03-06 350z. even the 07-08 350z is superior to the v6 stang. (fastest stock 07-08 350z was 13.1@108)
Last edited by SS4ME; 12-17-2010 at 10:36 AM.
#50
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
bang for buck i guess the 2011 v6 is good tho, but it will take full bolt ons and a tune to = a stock 370z.