War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

C5 Vette=ricer fly by... WTF?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2008, 10:11 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
04YellowGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-30-06
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mines_Better
dude, there are plenty of possibilities for why i was catching up. the point is, the story wasnt to brag about a race and thats the ONLY thing that some people picked out of it. no one seems to get that, even after i have said it 50 times. this will definitely turn into a "cobalts cant beat a corvette" thread. i guess some people go into every thread looking for mistakes and false implications.

some people got the point of the story though
It might not have been the point of the thread but........

Originally Posted by Mines_Better
yea i agree, but then he realized that this "pathetic excuse for a SS" was fetching his ass, so he stopped. haha!
Old 02-06-2008, 10:11 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
SK360's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-18-07
Location: Center Township (Pittsburgh), PA
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chevysalesman614
womp womp.
eyes rolled for what reason?
Old 02-06-2008, 10:48 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SK360
LS2 GTO's can trap 110 stock
Links?
Old 02-07-2008, 02:34 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mines_Better's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-20-05
Location: North Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SK360
Overweight GTO's? LS2 GTO's can trap 110 stock, and will pull a C5 vette on the street.
oh damn, look whats gonna start up now. im not bashing the GTO owner, but i had a feeling that a GTO owner would see that GTO comment. haha!

Originally Posted by 04YellowGT
It might not have been the point of the thread but........
see this is why i hate text. that comment was supposed to be sarcastic with the "haha!" but there is no way to really get voice inflection in there. thats probably why there is the misunderstanding.

Originally Posted by R&C_rallySS
What if you trap at 108? Thats still not enough to beat a C5 cuz I trap 108...
your mods make it clear that you can get off the line quick and i think thats the key to getting a good time and a good trap speed as well. i mean, if you spin for too far you have wasted a good bit off your distance to accelerate, and you arent accelerating strong the entire time in order to get up to an higher trap speed. on the other hand, if you hook like mother f*****, you take advantage of every inch of that 1/4 mile and you accelerate very strong the whole time. imagine if a corvette was front wheel drive, i dont think they would be quite as impressive in the 1/4 but they may still kill cars from a rolling position on the street.

this is just something i was thinking about, but it could be TOTALLY incorrect. there could be more complicated than that. if so, please educate me.

Last edited by Mines_Better; 02-07-2008 at 02:34 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 02-07-2008, 03:07 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Cobalt443's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-05
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 5,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Onyxd04Redline
Links?
ehh 109 close enough?

Old 02-07-2008, 03:14 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
R&C_rallySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-09-06
Location: PA
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ I wish I could nail a 2.0 60"
Old 02-07-2008, 03:20 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
memphisr24's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-20-05
Location: Rutherford, NJ
Posts: 6,313
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by xonic
NO!!
Ha...mine is with 100 octane ...faster than a m6 c5 with catback anyways ....from a roll obviously...dig i'd be slaughtered
Old 02-07-2008, 03:20 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Cobalt443's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-05
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 5,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by R&C_rallySS
^ I wish I could nail a 2.0 60"
best has been a 1.9 so far....but it ain't easy
Old 02-07-2008, 03:30 PM
  #34  
Banned
 
Onyxd04Redline's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cobalt443
ehh 109 close enough?

Wow... I retract my previous statement. That's pretty stout for a stock car and is faster then a stock C5

Don't understand why GM never gave the LS1-fbody the LS6. Would have been badass
Old 02-08-2008, 06:35 AM
  #35  
Member
 
BlueLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-22-07
Location: Nfld., Canada
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mines_Better


your mods make it clear that you can get off the line quick and i think thats the key to getting a good time and a good trap speed as well. i mean, if you spin for too far you have wasted a good bit off your distance to accelerate, and you arent accelerating strong the entire time in order to get up to an higher trap speed. on the other hand, if you hook like mother f*****, you take advantage of every inch of that 1/4 mile and you accelerate very strong the whole time. imagine if a corvette was front wheel drive, i dont think they would be quite as impressive in the 1/4 but they may still kill cars from a rolling position on the street.

this is just something i was thinking about, but it could be TOTALLY incorrect. there could be more complicated than that. if so, please educate me.
Actualy increased traction usually results in a lower trap than a run where you spin off the line, and this I've found to be true in my own cars at the strip over the years. The way it was explained to me was it has more to do with elapsed time than distance for that difference in trap speed - a run when you spin off the line usually results in a longer ET, so your car is actually accelerating for a longer period of time (therefore a higher trap speed) than when you dead hook on launch and hit a low ET.

All generally speaking of course.

Originally Posted by Cobalt443
ehh 109 close enough?

That's a nice run for a stock GTO - here's a stock ~ 110 run (right lane) for comparison, very similar. I haven't yet lost to a stock C5 (my best ET since then is 12.7 on a 1.90 60 still all stock), C6's though, they're another matter *L*.


Last edited by BlueLT; 02-08-2008 at 06:36 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 02-08-2008, 01:08 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Cobalt443's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-21-05
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 5,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueLT

That's a nice run for a stock GTO - here's a stock ~ 110 run (right lane) for comparison, very similar. I haven't yet lost to a stock C5 (my best ET since then is 12.7 on a 1.90 60 still all stock), C6's though, they're another matter *L*.

]

Nice! So far the best run to date has been a 12.88 at 108......
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tupp
Problems/Service/Maintenance
5
09-29-2015 11:07 PM
Getaway_Driver
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
40
09-10-2015 09:11 AM
Jacque8080
Problems/Service/Maintenance
3
09-09-2015 09:21 PM
Getaway_Driver
Problems/Service/Maintenance
41
09-08-2015 09:41 AM



Quick Reply: C5 Vette=ricer fly by... WTF?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 AM.