Cobalt SS/TC vs Evo X
06-06-2009, 11:34 AM
#26
Senior Member
had a guy in my area with an evo x and he wouldnt race? younger kid too so im sure he bought it to be fast not to calmy drive it around..... he was completely stock tho so i prolly would embarass him from roll
06-06-2009, 11:37 AM
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
much better car than the EVO Id say too.
Last edited by 1BADSS/SC; 06-06-2009 at 11:37 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
06-06-2009, 11:53 AM
#29
Senior Member
06-06-2009, 12:07 PM
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-17-07
Location: right behind you.
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06-06-2009, 12:22 PM
#32
Hey I LOOOOOOOOVE my SS/TC but I gotta say if I could have afforded an EvoX I'd have one. Sure stock for stock for less money the SS/TC is right up there. But you get a LOT more other **** with the EvoX besides just a powerful engine. I think they are damn nice cars.
06-06-2009, 10:50 PM
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06-07-2009, 12:36 AM
#37
Member
Join Date: 07-29-07
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06-07-2009, 01:12 AM
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"GT35R Twin Scroll Turbo Kit"
"This bolt on kit put down 510 horsepower on 91 octane at 20psi of boost and 600 horsepower on C16 race gas with stock internals.
So, do u have anymore questions? Maybe u could type control + f then enter 600 to find it too.
06-07-2009, 03:23 AM
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-22-08
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went from a 40 roll with an evo IX not too long ago and slowly walked him but I still would have traded cars with him evos look sooo bad ass it ridiculous especially the IX
06-07-2009, 09:00 AM
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-05-05
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WOW. People really dont know how to read.
"GT35R Twin Scroll Turbo Kit"
"This bolt on kit put down 510 horsepower on 91 octane at 20psi of boost and 600 horsepower on C16 race gas with stock internals.
So, do u have anymore questions? Maybe u could type control + f then enter 600 to find it too.
"GT35R Twin Scroll Turbo Kit"
"This bolt on kit put down 510 horsepower on 91 octane at 20psi of boost and 600 horsepower on C16 race gas with stock internals.
So, do u have anymore questions? Maybe u could type control + f then enter 600 to find it too.
. So because a website based on selling products (not R&D specifically on the Evo X engine) says it, it must be true? 
06-07-2009, 09:18 AM
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-09-08
Location: Conneautville. Pa
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats a matter of taste. I actually think they look stupid, boy racer and 4 doors. But thats just me.
06-07-2009, 12:35 PM
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: 08-27-06
Location: Oceanside, SOCAL
Posts: 6,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow theres alot of haters on these forums, the evo is a nice car, not to mention race proven i think mitsu knows what they are doing with these cars, especially being able to put whatever engine they want like the aluminum 4B11 in their cars now due to the WRC withdraw.
basically 4B11> LNF. mod for mod the evo will put down more HP than the TC, there is such a thing as 600+ evos, wheres the 600hp TCs? evos have also broken the 1000hp range, tc? better car, it's been proven and i bet over half this forum would take an evo if they could. seems like a bunch of people hating for no reason, but i would be hating too if i were still driving my FWD econobox.
basically 4B11> LNF. mod for mod the evo will put down more HP than the TC, there is such a thing as 600+ evos, wheres the 600hp TCs? evos have also broken the 1000hp range, tc? better car, it's been proven and i bet over half this forum would take an evo if they could. seems like a bunch of people hating for no reason, but i would be hating too if i were still driving my FWD econobox.
06-07-2009, 05:04 PM
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
are u ******* retarded? You must be. Where do u think they get their numbers from? O yea, thats right, DYNOS.
u have no clue.
Same kit different website dummy:
http://www.agency-power.com/catalog/...8-p-47998.html
and a youtube dyno:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goyXOXpXpMc
soo, 600 whp on stock internals. AS I SAID.
06-07-2009, 05:16 PM
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-05-05
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bitch.
06-07-2009, 05:18 PM
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-17-07
Location: right behind you.
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AMS made 550awhp on a pump/c16 mix with their 35r prototype kit. Multiple tuners have made deep into the 500awhp range and I wouldn't be surprised to see 600, although I haven't seen it yet, it may be out there.
06-07-2009, 05:24 PM
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whatever dude. When you own one and you push 600 hp through it, you can claim whatever you want. Being that I own one, and am going through a minor build (see: NOT 600hp on a stock engine) I can tell you, backed by 3 shops recommendations, 600hp on a stock internal engine, is not a good idea. But since you are an internet hard ass that doesnt own an evo, you can claim/believe whatever you want Bitch.
Bitch.BTW, the engine in the CSRT is pretty much the same. Cams are interchangable, PCM is the same, sensors, blah blah blah. In fact, theyre in the process of unlocking an EVO X PCM to be used in the CSRT as a way to tune the CSRT. Both built off the mitsu-GS platform. In addition to this, the CSRT has seen 570 whp with a turbo upgrade and stock internals. I really dont see how the EVO X wouldnt see the same either. 570 whp, no knock, no race gas. 600 whp is right around the corner for the CSRT.
06-07-2009, 05:52 PM
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-05-05
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOLOLOLOLZ. It takes MAYBE common sense to READ and COMPREHEND a dyno and information posted on NOT ONLY the vendor sites, but ALSO evoxforums.com.
BTW, the engine in the CSRT is pretty much the same. Cams are interchangable, PCM is the same, sensors, blah blah blah. In fact, theyre in the process of unlocking an EVO X PCM to be used in the CSRT as a way to tune the CSRT. Both built off the mitsu-GS platform. In addition to this, the CSRT has seen 570 whp with a turbo upgrade and stock internals. I really dont see how the EVO X wouldnt see the same either.
BTW, the engine in the CSRT is pretty much the same. Cams are interchangable, PCM is the same, sensors, blah blah blah. In fact, theyre in the process of unlocking an EVO X PCM to be used in the CSRT as a way to tune the CSRT. Both built off the mitsu-GS platform. In addition to this, the CSRT has seen 570 whp with a turbo upgrade and stock internals. I really dont see how the EVO X wouldnt see the same either.
06-07-2009, 06:10 PM
#50
wow theres alot of haters on these forums, the evo is a nice car, not to mention race proven i think mitsu knows what they are doing with these cars, especially being able to put whatever engine they want like the aluminum 4B11 in their cars now due to the WRC withdraw.
basically 4B11> LNF. mod for mod the evo will put down more HP than the TC, there is such a thing as 600+ evos, wheres the 600hp TCs? evos have also broken the 1000hp range, tc? better car, it's been proven and i bet over half this forum would take an evo if they could. seems like a bunch of people hating for no reason, but i would be hating too if i were still driving my FWD econobox.
basically 4B11> LNF. mod for mod the evo will put down more HP than the TC, there is such a thing as 600+ evos, wheres the 600hp TCs? evos have also broken the 1000hp range, tc? better car, it's been proven and i bet over half this forum would take an evo if they could. seems like a bunch of people hating for no reason, but i would be hating too if i were still driving my FWD econobox.
EVO= 4 doors, heavy and honestly not fast stock
Cobalt= 2 doors, lighter and faster stock
1400 HP Cobalt= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhTsH8dWtag