War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

Cobalt tc vs v6 Honda accord coupe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2013, 02:18 AM
  #101  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Vander Nars's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-10
Location: Augusta GA
Posts: 4,040
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I must of clicked on the wrong link, I thought this was a cobalt forum.
Vander Nars is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 04:10 AM
  #102  
Senior Member
 
MillerCycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vander Nars
I must of clicked on the wrong link, I thought this was a cobalt forum.
You must have clicked on the wrong link, I thought this was an Accord vs Cobalt thread.

Basically what it has amounted to is Cobalt T/C> Accord V6 6-speed > Cobalt S/C



-Accord making T/C power(240+ whp) with less then $300 in mods($50 CAI/ $100 custom J pipe/ $150 custom 3 inch CBE)!

Any stock T/C or modified S/C in okc area want to run ?

Last edited by MillerCycle; 01-07-2013 at 04:18 AM.
MillerCycle is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 06:04 AM
  #103  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Vander Nars's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-10
Location: Augusta GA
Posts: 4,040
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by MillerCycle
You must have clicked on the wrong link, I thought this was an Accord vs Cobalt thread.

Basically what it has amounted to is Cobalt T/C> Accord V6 6-speed > Cobalt S/C



-Accord making T/C power(240+ whp) with less then $300 in mods($50 CAI/ $100 custom J pipe/ $150 custom 3 inch CBE)!

Any stock T/C or modified S/C in okc area want to run ?
Lol u must be pulling my leg if u saying a 240whp 3200 pound accord is faster then a modded sc, most sc on m62 with bolt ons atleast make around 250+whp on canned tunes let alone they custom tune close to 265 to 270 and 2900 pounds.
Vander Nars is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 06:38 AM
  #104  
Senior Member
 
MillerCycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vander Nars
Lol u must be pulling my leg if u saying a 240whp 3200 pound accord is faster then a modded sc, most sc on m62 with bolt ons atleast make around 250+whp on canned tunes let alone they custom tune close to 265 to 270 and 2900 pounds.
After I get PCD's I will be at 255-260 whp untuned. 3150 lbs versus 2991, okay 150 lbs.... My car is a 6-speed, yours is 5-speed. That would make more of a difference then the ever so slight weight difference.



https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/gene...typhoon-46905/

^Stage 2- 223.8 WHP and 207 TQ on a dynojet.


^Dyno's same power as me, basically. 243 versus 242.
"stage 3 setup with canned ZZP tune. 2.9 15psi, cai, 50# injectors, Ingalls etd, CXRacing h/e with dual pass, long header to 3" outlet to full 3" back including high flow cat to 3" Magnaflow muffler."

Now show me an LSJ or LNF that gains 50 whp untuned without changing injectors or any internals; and with over 210,000 miles like my Honda.

Last edited by MillerCycle; 01-07-2013 at 07:03 AM.
MillerCycle is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:03 AM
  #105  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Vander Nars's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-10
Location: Augusta GA
Posts: 4,040
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
u link a video of some guy putting down 223 hp on stg 2 that means either that dyno is not reading correct or his car has some serious issue. I didnt realize u race in 6th gear, man all that power and tq u must be making in ur cruise gear lol
Vander Nars is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:05 AM
  #106  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Vander Nars's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-10
Location: Augusta GA
Posts: 4,040
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Also u didnt gain 50 whp by changing some exhuast pipes please stop posting before we all go full retard.
Vander Nars is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:08 AM
  #107  
Senior Member
 
MillerCycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC
Oh goodie so excited

Cant wait to see ur tq curve
So did you see my torque curve ?

Name:  photo3-6.jpg
Views: 581
Size:  150.4 KB
MillerCycle is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:10 AM
  #108  
Senior Member
 
MillerCycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vander Nars
u link a video of some guy putting down 223 hp on stg 2 that means either that dyno is not reading correct or his car has some serious issue. I didnt realize u race in 6th gear, man all that power and tq u must be making in ur cruise gear lol
You do realize the 5th gear in the V6 auto accord is taller then the 6th in the manual ? The 6th gear is there so the other 5 can be shorter! 1st-40, 2nd-60, 3rd-90, 4th-120, 5th-155
MillerCycle is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:13 AM
  #109  
Senior Member
 
MillerCycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vander Nars
Also u didnt gain 50 whp by changing some exhuast pipes please stop posting before we all go full retard.

That is SAE Corrected ^ Not STD. The lower numbers(255 whp) shown on the graph are for the dyno before he installed J37 IM(Intake Manifold) and J37 TB(Throttle Body).

He just has full intake and exhaust mods:
Intake side: Cold Air Intake, J37 Intake Manifold, J37 bored Throttle Body
Exhaust side: Pre-cat deletes, custom J pipe, 3 inch Catback Exhaust

He's at 272 whp(SAE Corrected nonetheless) untuned now.

Oh yeah, did I mention we can't have headers on our cars because the exhaust manifold is a part of the engine block ? Show me LSJ or LNF untuned w/o header gaining 50 whp with intake and exhaust.

Last edited by MillerCycle; 01-07-2013 at 07:24 AM.
MillerCycle is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:23 AM
  #110  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CudaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-21-09
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 11,295
Received 74 Likes on 63 Posts
They dont exist because our cars have MAP and MAF sensors. Im guessing Accord just have MAP sensors?



Oh and a 6 gear manual may or may not be quicker than a 5 speed. there are some factors in play that would make the 6 speed a hinderance. modified cobalt SS's make alot of torque. the car has no problem accelerating through 5 tall gears. It means less shifting for the cobalt driver, less room for mistakes, and less time having your foot off the gas. The shorter gear ratio of a 6 speed is great for acceleration up to 60ish mph but after than its gonna hurt top end performance, but I would like to say a 6 speed would be better suited for the v6 accord over the 5 speed based on that power curve.

Oh and I can gain 50whp just by going from one dyno to another

Last edited by CudaJoe; 01-07-2013 at 07:28 AM.
CudaJoe is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:29 AM
  #111  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CudaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-21-09
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 11,295
Received 74 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by NvrDwn
What mph do you run at the end of the 1/4?
104mph stock, probably alot higher now.
CudaJoe is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:31 AM
  #112  
Senior Member
 
MillerCycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CudaJoe
They dont exist because our cars have MAP and MAF sensors. Im guessing Accord just have MAP sensors?



Oh and a 6 gear manual may or may not be quicker than a 5 speed. there are some factors in play that would make the 6 speed a hinderance. modified cobalt SS's make alot of torque. the car has no problem accelerating through 5 tall gears. It means less shifting for the cobalt driver, less room for mistakes, and less time having your foot off the gas. The shorter gear ratio of a 6 speed is great for acceleration up to 60ish mph but after than its gonna hurt top end performance, but I would like to say a 6 speed would be better suited for the v6 accord over the 5 speed based on that power curve.

Oh and I can gain 50whp just by going from one dyno to another
Yeah, MAP. Okay now haha.... That's why my next car is going to be turbo. I'm jealous!
MillerCycle is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:32 AM
  #113  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CudaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-21-09
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 11,295
Received 74 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by NvrDwn
The ignorance is strong.
Everytime I go to the track, I DONT see accords running. They dont run. I see alot of civics and evos, and wrx's, and a plethera of other cars. I dont see v6 accords. Id have to see it with my own eyes because the ricer math just doesnt add up. a heavier car, with roughly the same hp BUT way lower torque can run mid 13's while a cobalt turbo sits roughly at 14s or just a tenth lower.
CudaJoe is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:33 AM
  #114  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CudaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-21-09
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 11,295
Received 74 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by MillerCycle
Yeah, MAP. Okay now haha.... That's why my next car is going to be turbo. I'm jealous!
So are you saying the accord does have MAP only or that you want a turbo car cause they have MAP sensors?

the MAF is what screws us, we cant make power without tuning, well.... that and AFR is pretty critical under boost lol.
CudaJoe is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:35 AM
  #115  
Senior Member
 
MillerCycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CudaJoe
So are you saying the accord does have MAP only or that you want a turbo car cause they have MAP sensors?

the MAF is what screws us, we cant make power without tuning, well.... that and AFR is pretty critical under boost lol.
The Accord does have MAP, I want turbo because you gain so much with just a tune and well.... for the sound and the way the power comes on.
MillerCycle is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:37 AM
  #116  
Senior Member
 
MillerCycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CudaJoe
Everytime I go to the track, I DONT see accords running. They dont run. I see alot of civics and evos, and wrx's, and a plethera of other cars. I dont see v6 accords. Id have to see it with my own eyes because the ricer math just doesnt add up. a heavier car, with roughly the same hp BUT way lower torque can run mid 13's while a cobalt turbo sits roughly at 14s or just a tenth lower.
The Accord running 13.3x-13.5x @ 106-107 mph is sitting at 270+ whp, it was 30 degrees out the night of those runs and the DA was negative on those runs. Hence freakishly high traps. Sonnick's channel shows him at the track from basically stock to where he is now.

Here's me racing full bolt on AP1 S2k that runs 13.9x..... from a dig. I had short ram intake, cat delete, and exhaust cutout at the time.


Last edited by MillerCycle; 01-07-2013 at 07:43 AM.
MillerCycle is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:39 AM
  #117  
Senior Member
 
MillerCycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CudaJoe
Everytime I go to the track, I DONT see accords running. They dont run. I see alot of civics and evos, and wrx's, and a plethera of other cars. I dont see v6 accords. Id have to see it with my own eyes because the ricer math just doesnt add up. a heavier car, with roughly the same hp BUT way lower torque can run mid 13's while a cobalt turbo sits roughly at 14s or just a tenth lower.
The 2003-2007 Accord V6 manuals have red V6 badge, I have seen a grand total of 3 in the entire time I have owned this car in the past 6 months. They're very rare.
MillerCycle is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:42 AM
  #118  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CudaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-21-09
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 11,295
Received 74 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by MillerCycle
The Accord does have MAP, I want turbo because you gain so much with just a tune and well.... for the sound and the way the power comes on.
ok gotcha. yes. stock turbo cars make retarded power with a tune. I mean coming from a n/a car myself, it was shocking. In the n/a world your expecting like 15whp and 20 trq at the most with a tune, not 65whp and 80-90 trq.
CudaJoe is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:43 AM
  #119  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CudaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-21-09
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 11,295
Received 74 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by MillerCycle
The 2003-2007 Accord V6 manuals have red V6 badge, I have seen a grand total of 3 in the entire time I have owned this car in the past 6 months. They're very rare.
And thats probably why I dont see them. whats the stock trq they put down? does the trq increase? Is 209 trq after bolt ons?
CudaJoe is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:51 AM
  #120  
Senior Member
 
MillerCycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CudaJoe
And thats probably why I dont see them. whats the stock trq they put down? does the trq increase? Is 209 trq after bolt ons?
Yeah, it's rated 240 hp/212 lb ft at the crank. With my i/e mods I beat the crank hp rating and almost got to the torque rating. The manual 3.0's do 210-220 whp/190-195 lb ft stock. They respond very well to bolt ons for n/a, as good or better then 2v 4.6.

The 08+ Accord V6 gains about 35-40 whp from just J pipe and Pre-Cat Deletes alone.

The reason they make so much, is because Honda has arguably the most restrictive exhaust systems out there. Here's my old OEM J pipe.
Name:  photo-79.jpg
Views: 594
Size:  180.9 KB
MillerCycle is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:55 AM
  #121  
Senior Member
 
MillerCycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MillerCycle
So did you see my torque curve ?

BTW guys, the red line is with my exhaust cutout open. I dyno'd with it open first, then the blue line(closed) like 30 seconds after. I gained power and torque everywhere with it closed, despite the fact there was no cooldown time for the engine.

Edit: Sure you guys don't care, but just explaining the difference.
MillerCycle is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 08:20 AM
  #122  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Vander Nars's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-10
Location: Augusta GA
Posts: 4,040
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Lol ricer math and comparing what ur friend runs in the 1/4, that u raced from a roll **** is just getting better and better.
Vander Nars is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 08:53 AM
  #123  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Vander Nars's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-12-10
Location: Augusta GA
Posts: 4,040
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

lol he drives an accord and raps to g-unit songs...

just a real winner!

Last edited by Vander Nars; 01-07-2013 at 10:56 AM.
Vander Nars is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 01:18 PM
  #124  
New Member
 
NvrDwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-19-12
Location: Virgina
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MillerCycle
I was basically stock then, also had 2.6 60 foot on that run.
Lol my post was meant as a joke.
NvrDwn is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 04:18 PM
  #125  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by CudaJoe
Everytime I go to the track, I DONT see accords running. They dont run. I see alot of civics and evos, and wrx's, and a plethera of other cars. I dont see v6 accords. Id have to see it with my own eyes because the ricer math just doesnt add up. a heavier car, with roughly the same hp BUT way lower torque can run mid 13's while a cobalt turbo sits roughly at 14s or just a tenth lower.
This. LNF cobalts at 243 whp and 252 wtrq SAE bone stock and 200 lbs lighter typically run low 14s at 100-104 MPH. 2 guys have run 13.5 at 104 stock in mine shaft like DAs but that is a different story. Trapping 107 MPH in a 3200 lb car should take quite a bit more than 240 whp and 207 wrtq except maybe in -500 ft DA. Best example I can think of that weighs about the same and makes the same amount of power (hp wise) is a 4.6L 2 valve mustang. They make around 235 whp and 270 wrtq stock and weigh 3200 lbs. They run low 14s at 100 MPH and they are rwd and make a ton more low end and midrange torque which will make for a better launch and et with a similar trap vs a fwd car of similar weight and power.
Terminator2 is offline  


Quick Reply: Cobalt tc vs v6 Honda accord coupe



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 AM.