Cobalt vs ION
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-20-05
Location: North Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
all i have read is that the redline is lighter, im not sure where the info comes from that the cobalt is lighter. does anyone have a link that shows this?
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-01-05
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont think the cobalt is lighter, I think they are only off by a few pounds. a few pounds wont make or break a car. 200+ maybe, but 60 lbs, come on? I can take my spare out and weigh the same.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-04-05
Location: LongIsland
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mines_Better
Darksun... i dont remember ever talking to you before... but as for my ONE race, i have raced and '06 redline as well, and won. also been to the track with 2 others and watched both of them have trouble breaking 9.7 in the 1/8. im not ******* on the redline, i like them a lot, im just sayin what i have seen from my experience, and my experience shows me that the redline is a hair slower. never claimed to be totally correct. "it might be different in other states though" please dont try to belittle me with your comments, im not trying to act like a jerk here...
#29
Originally Posted by Mines_Better
actually, when i race a RL on the highway from about 70mph, just one gear, i win everytime. i have discussed this with the RL owner a couple times now. just pushing the gas down when already in the gear has nothing to do with the skill of the driver, so clearly there is something about the SS that is different. doesnt it have a better transmission or something?
AHEMMMM......
#30
Senior Member
The difference from the 04 redline and the 06 redline/cobalt SS is the god damn ECU GM gave yall a better one then me good for atleast 10 ponies them ****'s lol
check the part numbers they are totally different.
for real if i was stock and my bro was also hed beat me bye 2 cars every time now im faster down low , and a lil threw mid range then he makes it back up
My can has gained alot of power from its mods But jeremy had alot more to start out with when his intake adjusts and and he gets a header hell probably beat me by a car everytime
But that is when i need to start thinking about upgradign past the warrenty like P& P head with new valves and springs w/ new pistons (rev limiter bumped to 8k) or a 25 shot N20 kit something to compensate for my loss
we will have a few vids up once his car adjusts a lil more
check the part numbers they are totally different.
for real if i was stock and my bro was also hed beat me bye 2 cars every time now im faster down low , and a lil threw mid range then he makes it back up
My can has gained alot of power from its mods But jeremy had alot more to start out with when his intake adjusts and and he gets a header hell probably beat me by a car everytime
But that is when i need to start thinking about upgradign past the warrenty like P& P head with new valves and springs w/ new pistons (rev limiter bumped to 8k) or a 25 shot N20 kit something to compensate for my loss
we will have a few vids up once his car adjusts a lil more
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-17-04
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Weight from GM Canada
2945 RL and 2925lbs for the S/C SS
optinaed differently---either one could weigh more.
I wouldn't trust that US site Chevrolet.com they have an outrageously WRONG weight for the
Cobalt sedan 3,216lbs!!!
On another note the base RL is a steal! They have in where we bought out Vue.
Its $22,900! CDN dollars. Thats only $800 more then my 2.4L SS and cheaper buy over $2K on the S/C SS. But I can't stand the dash---but it looked good without the hideous RICER wing
2945 RL and 2925lbs for the S/C SS
optinaed differently---either one could weigh more.
I wouldn't trust that US site Chevrolet.com they have an outrageously WRONG weight for the
Cobalt sedan 3,216lbs!!!
On another note the base RL is a steal! They have in where we bought out Vue.
Its $22,900! CDN dollars. Thats only $800 more then my 2.4L SS and cheaper buy over $2K on the S/C SS. But I can't stand the dash---but it looked good without the hideous RICER wing
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: 11-15-05
Location: Newton Highlands, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i got my info from sport compact car magazine, the cobalt is about 75 or so pounds lighter but because the wheels weigh so damn much the redline edged us out or something...that's just what i read
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-04-05
Location: LongIsland
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GSoccer24
i got my info from sport compact car magazine, the cobalt is about 75 or so pounds lighter but because the wheels weigh so damn much the redline edged us out or something...that's just what i read
#35
less filling..........tastes great..........less filling tastes great..............Car and Driver's test of the two cars, the RL had the quicker numbers and faster top speed than the SS/SC. Also I think Road and Track did a test of both cars and the SS/SC was a bit quicker. From that one can conclude that MAYBE, just MAYBE they're the same cars you think? I bet you could line up two RLs and one would probably come out to be just a tad quicker. You could line up two SS/SCs and one would be quicker. The build variation from one LSJ to another (like most engines) will net different HP/TQ numbers. It would be nice if a car company could build engines to perfect performance specifications but don't look for it to happen anytime soon.
#37
A) The wheel weight issue is 100% bullshit, people who had Z28 Camaro's tried this when
they were saying why they didn't like/buy an SS.
B) The Cobalt SS is lighter and the sunroof doesn't weigh 60lbs
C) Why can no one here figure this out? The driver is the deciding factor in any vehicles
performance. Hell the same drives couldn't pull the exact same time out of the exact
same car 2 out of 3 times so any .05-.10 difference is pretty much a wash.
This little debate is no different than Z28/Formula vs SS/WS6/Firehawk. Blah, Blah your 17" wheels weigh more. I don't have power options or t-tops or power locks. In reality they are all within 50-75lbs of each other and driving is the deciding factor.
they were saying why they didn't like/buy an SS.
B) The Cobalt SS is lighter and the sunroof doesn't weigh 60lbs
C) Why can no one here figure this out? The driver is the deciding factor in any vehicles
performance. Hell the same drives couldn't pull the exact same time out of the exact
same car 2 out of 3 times so any .05-.10 difference is pretty much a wash.
This little debate is no different than Z28/Formula vs SS/WS6/Firehawk. Blah, Blah your 17" wheels weigh more. I don't have power options or t-tops or power locks. In reality they are all within 50-75lbs of each other and driving is the deciding factor.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-04-05
Location: LongIsland
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by codyss
A) The wheel weight issue is 100% bullshit, people who had Z28 Camaro's tried this when
they were saying why they didn't like/buy an SS.
B) The Cobalt SS is lighter and the sunroof doesn't weigh 60lbs
C) Why can no one here figure this out? The driver is the deciding factor in any vehicles
performance. Hell the same drives couldn't pull the exact same time out of the exact
same car 2 out of 3 times so any .05-.10 difference is pretty much a wash.
This little debate is no different than Z28/Formula vs SS/WS6/Firehawk. Blah, Blah your 17" wheels weigh more. I don't have power options or t-tops or power locks. In reality they are all within 50-75lbs of each other and driving is the deciding factor.
they were saying why they didn't like/buy an SS.
B) The Cobalt SS is lighter and the sunroof doesn't weigh 60lbs
C) Why can no one here figure this out? The driver is the deciding factor in any vehicles
performance. Hell the same drives couldn't pull the exact same time out of the exact
same car 2 out of 3 times so any .05-.10 difference is pretty much a wash.
This little debate is no different than Z28/Formula vs SS/WS6/Firehawk. Blah, Blah your 17" wheels weigh more. I don't have power options or t-tops or power locks. In reality they are all within 50-75lbs of each other and driving is the deciding factor.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-01-05
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#45
Originally Posted by GotBoost?
The RL did not have the quicker numbers. Show the link to prove it.
Here I'll make it easier for you......
Car and Driver does not post their complete stats online but here is the article
Cheap Speed
Oh by the way my point is NOT THAT THE RED LINE IS FASTER nor that the COBALT IS FASTER, my point is that THEY ARE THE EXACT SAME FREAKING CARS and that you can find performance stats to back EITHER argument that one car is FASTER THAN THE OTHER. The ONE thing I WILL say is that the LSJ cars ARE FASTER than the Piece Of **** RSX Type-S that won the stupid comparo.........
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-01-05
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TXRLU
Here I'll make it easier for you......
Car and Driver does not post their complete stats online but here is the article
Cheap Speed
Oh by the way my point is NOT THAT THE RED LINE IS FASTER nor that the COBALT IS FASTER, my point is that THEY ARE THE EXACT SAME FREAKING CARS and that you can find performance stats to back EITHER argument that one car is FASTER THAN THE OTHER. The ONE thing I WILL say is that the LSJ cars ARE FASTER than the Piece Of **** RSX Type-S that won the stupid comparo.........
Car and Driver does not post their complete stats online but here is the article
Cheap Speed
Oh by the way my point is NOT THAT THE RED LINE IS FASTER nor that the COBALT IS FASTER, my point is that THEY ARE THE EXACT SAME FREAKING CARS and that you can find performance stats to back EITHER argument that one car is FASTER THAN THE OTHER. The ONE thing I WILL say is that the LSJ cars ARE FASTER than the Piece Of **** RSX Type-S that won the stupid comparo.........
our 0-100 is faster then the ions and the ions 0-120 is faster then ours. this is such a load of horse ****. It even says same gear ratios so how does that work?
I agree same cars for the most part. No 2 ions are going to be the same and no 2 cobalts are either. Plus you have to factor in drivers and such. I say we drop this now since obviously we are all acting like a bunch of noobs, rather then just geting along.
#47
Originally Posted by Xenozx
OK I was bout to jump all over that and every other car mag.
What's jacked up also if you notice, stupid Magazine says the Cobalt/Redline take 15.3 and 15.6 seconds respectively to get to 100 MPH but their 1/4 mile times indicate 14.6 at 98 and 99 MPH, so it took them almost 1 full second to get that extra 1-2 MPH?!?! This comparison test (along with Car and Driver's obvious long-running anti-Domestic stance) is the very reason that I cancelled my subscription to Car and Driver.
But back to the original thread, the cars are pretty much the same, yeah there is going to be a little variation here and there but as you stated, you're just as likely to find that same build variation from Cobalt to Cobalt and Redline to Redline. I say we forget the Cobalt against Ion discussion and move onto a Cobalt/Ion Vs Import mode
#49
Originally Posted by wasey13
TXRLU, why is the RSX type-S a POS???
Notice the Acura is almost a good 2 seconds behind the first place SRT-4
In this CHEAP SPEED comparison it was ranked #1 by the "fine" (sarcasm smiley would go here) automotive journalists at Car and Driver but as you can see it came dead last in virtually ALL performance categories hence my designation of it as a POS.
#50
Originally Posted by TXRLU
Notice the Acura is almost a good 2 seconds behind the first place SRT-4
In this CHEAP SPEED comparison it was ranked #1 by the "fine" (sarcasm smiley would go here) automotive journalists at Car and Driver but as you can see it came dead last in virtually ALL performance categories hence my designation of it as a POS.