Cobalt vs ION
01-03-2006, 07:46 AM
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-04-05
Location: LongIsland
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wasey13
So a title of something defines everything about it? If I remember right part of the comparison was build and drive quality. I am also sure resale value played a part in it too. So once again why is the type-S a POS? What I am trying to get at is how you can possibly have the audacity to call a superiorly built car a POS? (wtf smilie would go here)
01-03-2006, 10:31 AM
#52
Banned
Join Date: 11-11-05
Location: Bako
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Darksun280
This one sir
01-03-2006, 11:03 AM
#53
Banned
Join Date: 05-12-05
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry but when I am looking to go fast refinement is right under fuel economy.
Who cares how refined the RSX is? Does that make up for it's lack of power?
Car & Driver is worthless anyway. Especially when other road tests of the Cobalt SS have yielded a 14.4 @ 100mph 1/4. Thats quite a difference when compaired to C&D's 15 second plus 0-100.
Who cares how refined the RSX is? Does that make up for it's lack of power?
Car & Driver is worthless anyway. Especially when other road tests of the Cobalt SS have yielded a 14.4 @ 100mph 1/4. Thats quite a difference when compaired to C&D's 15 second plus 0-100.
01-03-2006, 11:14 AM
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: 12-06-05
Location: California
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Xenozx
hell if you look closely they say the cobalt weighs less then the ION
01-03-2006, 12:46 PM
#56
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 09-11-05
Location: Alabama
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Darksun280
I agree but some people like to find the smallest thing to bitch about to say why there car is better than another. Next its going to be Red cobalts are faster than the black cobalts.
01-03-2006, 01:25 PM
#57
Banned
Join Date: 11-11-05
Location: Bako
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by codyss
Sorry but when I am looking to go fast refinement is right under fuel economy.
Who cares how refined the RSX is? Does that make up for it's lack of power?
Car & Driver is worthless anyway. Especially when other road tests of the Cobalt SS have yielded a 14.4 @ 100mph 1/4. Thats quite a difference when compaired to C&D's 15 second plus 0-100.
Who cares how refined the RSX is? Does that make up for it's lack of power?
Car & Driver is worthless anyway. Especially when other road tests of the Cobalt SS have yielded a 14.4 @ 100mph 1/4. Thats quite a difference when compaired to C&D's 15 second plus 0-100.
They have already said why they got those numbers. This thread needs to be locked, this horse has already completely decomposed.
01-03-2006, 02:44 PM
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-04-05
Location: LongIsland
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wasey13
They have already said why they got those numbers. This thread needs to be locked, this horse has already completely decomposed.
01-03-2006, 02:47 PM
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-04-05
Location: LongIsland
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by codyss
Enough about the damn weight issue, how many sources have put the Cobalt SS 20-80lbs lighter than the ION already?
01-03-2006, 02:56 PM
#61
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 09-11-05
Location: Alabama
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How about that niether one is faster than the other. Lets just leave it at that. The only reason i started this thread was because they were saying the the redlines are faster on the redlineforums.
01-03-2006, 03:04 PM
#62
Banned
Join Date: 11-11-05
Location: Bako
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Darksun280
Whats this Wasey you giving up the good fight?!? Thats not like you. Don't tell me The cobalt diehard, nutswingers on this site are actually starting to get to you.
01-03-2006, 04:58 PM
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-01-05
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pclear9061
HAHAHAHAHAHA i would like to know where in that post that you see any weights?
our LBS per HP are lower then the Redlines, yet both cars show 205 HP. It doesnt show the weight, but if you do the math this says we are lighter...
READ foo :P
01-03-2006, 09:34 PM
#64
Banned
Join Date: 10-30-05
Location: in a house
Posts: 7,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GotBoost?
How about that niether one is faster than the other. Lets just leave it at that. The only reason i started this thread was because they were saying the the redlines are faster on the redlineforums.
...........and the SRT4s beat both cars by "bus-lengths" on the SRT4 forums, a "lightly" modded Mustang GT can run with a new Z06 on the Mustang forum, the new Honda Civic SI can run with a 350Z on the Civic forums, there's a trend but I can't quite put my finger on it...........?!?!?!?!
01-04-2006, 05:01 PM
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-01-05
Location: Delaware
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TXRLU
...........and the SRT4s beat both cars by "bus-lengths" on the SRT4 forums, a "lightly" modded Mustang GT can run with a new Z06 on the Mustang forum, the new Honda Civic SI can run with a 350Z on the Civic forums, there's a trend but I can't quite put my finger on it...........?!?!?!?!
But a stock SRT-4 beats us by about 20 cars (yea someone said that on the SRT forums. He was like "Nice try chevy" I just laughed. It was built by the hand of god though, so maybe its true....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
royce777
Parts
27
09-28-2015 07:11 AM