Gto
#128
Originally Posted by lsjwannabe
people need to stop putting good motor's in heavy cars end of story.
#132
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can tell u now though, my CSRT would crush my SS/SC, so Im not very impressed with the GTO's. Too heavy of a car to be a good platform. Not to mention expensive as HELL to mod.
#133
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-05-08
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GTO's arent that great. I raced one in my SS/SC when I had it. 2.9", stage 2, GMPP exhaust, and I held dead even with him from a 40 ( he had a stock 6.0l ). Now, my car was freak, and I pulled multiple car lengths on my friends SS/SC who had the same exact mods at me.
I can tell u now though, my CSRT would crush my SS/SC, so Im not very impressed with the GTO's. Too heavy of a car to be a good platform. Not to mention expensive as HELL to mod.
I can tell u now though, my CSRT would crush my SS/SC, so Im not very impressed with the GTO's. Too heavy of a car to be a good platform. Not to mention expensive as HELL to mod.
Oh well we have now opened the gate to hell so hold on.
#136
Banned
Join Date: 01-13-08
Location: Tallahassee/Miami
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GTO's arent that great. I raced one in my SS/SC when I had it. 2.9", stage 2, GMPP exhaust, and I held dead even with him from a 40 ( he had a stock 6.0l ). Now, my car was freak, and I pulled multiple car lengths on my friends SS/SC who had the same exact mods at me.
I can tell u now though, my CSRT would crush my SS/SC, so Im not very impressed with the GTO's. Too heavy of a car to be a good platform. Not to mention expensive as HELL to mod.
I can tell u now though, my CSRT would crush my SS/SC, so Im not very impressed with the GTO's. Too heavy of a car to be a good platform. Not to mention expensive as HELL to mod.
#137
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#139
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-05-08
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#140
Banned
Join Date: 01-13-08
Location: Tallahassee/Miami
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you don't have to be heavy to have an interior...
My car is a bit over 2800, the cobalt is around 2900, rsx is about 2700. Those are normal econobox curb weights...The GTI (3200) and he Caliber (about 3200)....are heavier ones. To try and act like that's not the case, well I dunno what to tell you
Hell an Evo 9 is about 3200...but I can live with that because AWD components DEFINITELY add to the weight of a car...but a 3200 lb FWD econobox??? Hell no, that weight is simply...unjustified
My car is a bit over 2800, the cobalt is around 2900, rsx is about 2700. Those are normal econobox curb weights...The GTI (3200) and he Caliber (about 3200)....are heavier ones. To try and act like that's not the case, well I dunno what to tell you
Hell an Evo 9 is about 3200...but I can live with that because AWD components DEFINITELY add to the weight of a car...but a 3200 lb FWD econobox??? Hell no, that weight is simply...unjustified
#141
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-05-08
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you don't have to be heavy to have an interior...
My car is a bit over 2800, the cobalt is around 2900, rsx is about 2700. Those are normal econobox curb weights...The GTI (3200) and he Caliber (about 3200)....are heavier ones. To try and act like that's not the case, well I dunno what to tell you
My car is a bit over 2800, the cobalt is around 2900, rsx is about 2700. Those are normal econobox curb weights...The GTI (3200) and he Caliber (about 3200)....are heavier ones. To try and act like that's not the case, well I dunno what to tell you
#142
Banned
Join Date: 01-13-08
Location: Tallahassee/Miami
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
we're talking about econoboxes....My car did mid 13's stock BTW. You took ONE example (the only one that ran high 14's) and used that...not a real good position to take in order to make a point
Like I said an AWD Evo 9 weighs about the same as a Caliber SRT...that's not acceptable for a FWD Econobox, no justification for that extra weight
Like I said an AWD Evo 9 weighs about the same as a Caliber SRT...that's not acceptable for a FWD Econobox, no justification for that extra weight
#144
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-05-08
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
we're talking about econoboxes....My car did mid 13's stock BTW. You took ONE example (the only one that ran high 14's) and used that...not a real good position to take in order to make a point
Like I said an AWD Evo 9 weighs about the same as a Caliber SRT...that's not acceptable for a FWD Econobox, no justification for that extra weight
Like I said an AWD Evo 9 weighs about the same as a Caliber SRT...that's not acceptable for a FWD Econobox, no justification for that extra weight
#146
Banned
Join Date: 01-13-08
Location: Tallahassee/Miami
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if you say so....I don't care to argue with you really. There are plenty of videos and slips of stock ones doing mid 13's...but I'll just let you win this one (you like to argue, and I don't really care to prove anything to you which is pretty common knowledge)
#147
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-05-08
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like to argue with fanboys and you seem to fit the bill perfectly. I am not alone in saying you are full of **** when it comes to stock SRT-4's running id 13's this argument is so 2005 it isn't even funny.
#149
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-05-08
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts