Me Vs. VIPER Vs. JEEP?
#27
Originally Posted by 97CIVIC
I thought it was Dodge motors, but its Chrystler motors
All 3 of the SRT-8s are capable of mid to high 12s bone stock.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-22-06
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 280Z1977
It is Daimler Chrysler (DCX) motors.
All 3 of the SRT-8s are capable of mid to high 12s bone stock.
All 3 of the SRT-8s are capable of mid to high 12s bone stock.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-11-05
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have personally seen an SRT-8 Cherokee go 12.9 @ 10X (think it was 104) mph bone stock w/ the dealer plates still on it. It was actually trailored up to the track as well.
#31
Originally Posted by leviticus88
No sir... not 12's. Don't BS a BSer!
http://www.300cforums.com/forums/srt...one-stock.html
#34
Originally Posted by snobird
if im correct the srt 8 charger they say is mid 5s o to 60 can someone confirm this cause if so the jeep is faster
#35
Junior Member
Join Date: 11-23-05
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 280Z1977
That just means it is quicker to 60, due to AWD. The Charger and 300C will have more topend. They are all capable of mid to high 12s.
I would love to own any SRT-8 vehicle.....
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: 01-02-05
Location: Toronto (woodbridge)
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by joedashow
That HAD to be the Grand Cherokee SRT-8. I want to race one in a Trailblazer SS.
yea that jeep goes!!!
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-30-06
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 5,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In this particular test, the SRT Chrysler ran 60 in 4.8 and the quarter in 13.2. I think the Charger is a tad lighter than the C as well. (still a porker though!)
#38
Member
Join Date: 11-08-05
Location: NewYork/Florida
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by joedashow
That HAD to be the Grand Cherokee SRT-8. I want to race one in a Trailblazer SS.
Hell yea that is, my school (Northwood Univ.) puts on an autoshow everyear and DaimlerChrysler sent down the entire SRT line with a Showcar and Prototype Technician. He said they underrated those engines by 45hp, theyre actually puttin down 470hp on a dyno. The JEEP was ******* fast. The Charger was incredible and even the SRT6 Crossfire was amazingly quick. I cant wait for next year because I'll be runnig the show and I'll be able to take one home for the nite,lol. They did a kick ass job. Id love to see the Trailblazer SS run it but I dont think it could shake a stick at the SRT8. I saw a Trailblazer SS today when I picked up my car from the dealer theyre pretty sweet looks wise though.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-30-06
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 5,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The difference between the Jeep and Chevy I think are similar to just about any SRT to SS comparison, in that the SRT is more about ***** to the walls performance with little regard to anything else, while the Chevy may not be as fast, but will genereally be more comfortable / practical as a daily driver.
#40
Originally Posted by elmstreet
probably goes from Full to Empty in under 5 seconds as well lmao
#41
Originally Posted by Zoomyjs
does dodge make jeep? does jeep make dodge? do they just work together?
are they chinese/japenese? or american?
are they chinese/japenese? or american?
#43
Originally Posted by Cman06sssc
2000 Dodge viper 1/4 mile 11.861 @ 126.187
V/S
2006 Jeep SRT8 1/4 mile 13.49 @ 102.24
=
Lance Armstrong
V/S
Quadriplegic
V/S
2006 Jeep SRT8 1/4 mile 13.49 @ 102.24
=
Lance Armstrong
V/S
Quadriplegic
#45
Originally Posted by cobaltR
The trailblazer ss runs around a 14.4ish in the quarter....so technically it would beat a stock ss/sc.....but obviously it would be close race....but the srt8.....forget it....that thing is one sick suv.....its supposely runs mid-low 13's...I've seen 13.3-13.5 times for those.
#46
Originally Posted by 97CIVIC
it has the same engine as the base model of the corvette(Ls6),and that engine has 400hp!
#47
Originally Posted by Tomtwtwtw
The difference between the Jeep and Chevy I think are similar to just about any SRT to SS comparison, in that the SRT is more about ***** to the walls performance with little regard to anything else, while the Chevy may not be as fast, but will genereally be more comfortable / practical as a daily driver.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-30-06
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 5,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 280Z1977
Have you been in any SRT vehicles, other then an SRT-4??? I can't comment on the SRT-10, but the SRT-6 and SRT-8s come with AWESOME and very comfortable interiors.
#49
Originally Posted by Tomtwtwtw
I think you misunderstand me. I didn't mention anything about the interiors of either car...I mean more along the lines of a comfortable ride, versatility, etc... i.e. The GTO gets better reviews on ride and cruising comfort than the SRT-8 Charger, the Cobalt gets better marks than the Neon in the same department, the Trailblazer SS can tow stuff, the Jeep can't, and so on. Nothing against SRT at all, I just think they're aiming at a slightly different crowd than the SS vehicles are. Hence the reason I got a Cobalt. I like the Neon, but the Cobalt, inho, is quieter, and more comfortable to drive every day than the Neon. I want a quick car, but I don't need the fastest on my block.
#50
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 05-03-05
Location: Ar-kan-sas
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tomtwtwtw
I think you misunderstand me. I didn't mention anything about the interiors of either car...I mean more along the lines of a comfortable ride, versatility, etc... i.e. The GTO gets better reviews on ride and cruising comfort than the SRT-8 Charger, the Cobalt gets better marks than the Neon in the same department, the Trailblazer SS can tow stuff, the Jeep can't, and so on. Nothing against SRT at all, I just think they're aiming at a slightly different crowd than the SS vehicles are. Hence the reason I got a Cobalt. I like the Neon, but the Cobalt, inho, is quieter, and more comfortable to drive every day than the Neon. I want a quick car, but I don't need the fastest on my block.