War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

New Civic SI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2006, 12:25 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OniMirage's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-14-05
Location: Phx, AZ
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New Civic SI

So i was on my way to work this morning listening to some oakenfold when i notice some shiny new lights in my rear view mirror getting onto the freeway. I was just cruisin enjoying the morning air and nearly none existant traffic and as a black z3 changed lanes, i noticed an H logo coming up fast. As it got closer I saw it, the SI logo on the grill and thought this has to be an older model with the logo added. The car pull passed me and I new instantely that it was the new SI. I thought hm it's a nice looking car and just kept driving.

The civic then slowed it's rate of travel and started to pace me. After looking in every direction to check for the guy in blue i dropped it into 4th and checked my speed, a steady 63 mph. The civic heard my engine rev up a bit from my downshift and must have thought that I was goin for it so he downshifted and darted forward. I slammed the gas but forgot that i was still in 4th and the civic was pulling. I realized the error and shifted to 3rd as the civic was at my front end and that was it, it was all over. As if the theme song from the intro in gt4 was playing in the background, and time was in slow motion, I pulled on him. It was in my opinion bad. By the end of 3rd I had reduced his lead to my back end and going into 4th was even worse as I pulled car lengths away from the SI. Since I could see the entire civic and a large space of road between us in my rear view I discontinued going any further and the SI knowing of its loss got into the hov and just slowed down as I slowed down to get onto my exit.
Old 05-11-2006, 12:27 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
CobaltBurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea they are slow.....
Old 05-11-2006, 12:46 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
player_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-20-05
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They really aren't all tha impressive
Old 05-11-2006, 12:49 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OniMirage's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-14-05
Location: Phx, AZ
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by player_1
They really aren't all tha impressive
no not really but i wouldn't mind driving next to one on the freeway definently not ricey looking like the older models. hopefully alot of the owners keep em looking stock
Old 05-11-2006, 12:56 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
ralliartist's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-06-05
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
nice runs man!!! those cars are starting to show everyone how really fast they are. the hype is starting to disappear. It's definitely not the car that the magazines said it was.
Old 05-11-2006, 01:02 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
SLSDuke82's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-31-05
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Must've had his VTEC turned off
Old 05-11-2006, 01:04 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OniMirage's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-14-05
Location: Phx, AZ
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SLSDuke82
Must've had his VTEC turned off
dude get it right i can't believe you said that, its V-TACH lol
Old 05-11-2006, 01:07 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
mycavisux97's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-05
Location: canandaigua, New York
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice kill.. magazines likce car and driver just love hondas.. magazines in real life don't count
Old 05-11-2006, 01:14 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
AmericanMuscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-06
Location: US
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice kill.

I've heard the new Si's are "fun to drive", but they aren't fast by any means of the word
Old 05-11-2006, 01:15 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CobaltLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-19-06
Location: New York (upstate)
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yay! Beat down those imports...I have yet to race one in my 2.2...I hope I get a chance soon to see how i'll hold up.
Old 05-11-2006, 02:32 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
CobaltBurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i hate all car magazine for hte most part, if its a Honda its god to them..... IE (RIDGELINE THE TRUCK OF THE YEAR HAHAHAHWTF???A?A??A?A
Old 05-11-2006, 03:49 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Spoony's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-05
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CobaltBurst
i hate all car magazine for hte most part, if its a Honda its god to them..... IE (RIDGELINE THE TRUCK OF THE YEAR HAHAHAHWTF???A?A??A?A
That's not necessairly true...R&T did a comparo of the RSX-S vs the Cobalt SS, it was close...but they didn't give the win to the RSX.

http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....&page_number=1

The RSX-S lost in all but 2 performance categories..(one of which isn't really much of a performance category)...of course it madeup some ground in the "subjective ratings"...though it is interesting to me how the RSX was out-braked pretty badly and still scored a max rating on their subjective ratings for braking...
Old 05-11-2006, 04:13 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
IonNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: AZ
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if you think the magazines treat the SS/SC bad...try reading up on a Redline.

Funny how that Chevy badge can get you so many better reviews
Old 05-11-2006, 04:19 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
joedashow's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-26-06
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IonNinja
if you think the magazines treat the SS/SC bad...try reading up on a Redline.

Funny how that Chevy badge can get you so many better reviews
That happens when you spend your first 10 years as the "bottom of the barrel" division. Can't just change people's impression overnight, even though Saturns are leaps and bounds over the original '92s.
Old 05-11-2006, 04:29 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
CobaltBurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i had a 92 SC 2 > and i beat hondas all day with it lol
Old 05-11-2006, 04:30 PM
  #16  
Member
 
Spoony's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-05
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IonNinja
if you think the magazines treat the SS/SC bad...try reading up on a Redline.

Funny how that Chevy badge can get you so many better reviews
The complaints on the redline that I've red seemed to be mostly in regards to the center mounted gauges, shift lights and other minor things. Other then that reviews have pretty much shared the same negatives and positives.

One really funny thing...at least to me, is that in their 5 car round-up they placed the Acura RSX ahead of the cobalt (and everything else) as the first place car...then when they did a comparison of these 2 cars head-2-head, the Cobalt took the win.

So the acura is better when there are more cars in the mix...I guess...(?)
Old 05-11-2006, 04:39 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
joedashow's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-26-06
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CobaltBurst
i had a 92 SC 2 > and i beat hondas all day with it lol
This is my brother's SC2:



My only complaint is that whoever owned it before him put a fart can on it. Pretty embarassing when you take off at a light next to a Charger, GTO, Vette, etc...
Old 05-11-2006, 05:20 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
CobaltBurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice, mine was TEAL god the look on their faces when they were beat.... priceless!!
Old 05-11-2006, 05:37 PM
  #19  
Member
 
ssritz's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-14-06
Location: VA Beach
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CobaltLT
Yay! Beat down those imports...I have yet to race one in my 2.2...I hope I get a chance soon to see how i'll hold up.
Actually it would be the same story in a 2.2. Just beat him before the govi kicks in and whatch your shifting and you will be alright. Just took one down a couple of days ago in my 2.2 .
Old 05-12-2006, 06:03 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
ralliartist's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-06-05
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ssritz
Actually it would be the same story in a 2.2. Just beat him before the govi kicks in and whatch your shifting and you will be alright. Just took one down a couple of days ago in my 2.2 .
you just took down what in your 2.2? an Si? doubtful. was he racing or was it a parked car?
Old 05-12-2006, 08:58 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
stg2cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-29-06
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
have you guys ever driven a si before (i mean the o6) b/c yes they are slower than the cobalt ss/sc in the straight lines but in autocroses they do better times than the cobalt the quality on those car are a lot better weights less than the ss/sc and did i mention the 8k rpms and yet cost less than the ss/sc which you can use the difference to buy a turbo or sc and yes is a honda

My girdfriend has one and i drive a cobalt ss/sc i love my car but i enjoy driving her as well
Old 05-12-2006, 09:05 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
CobaltBurst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-08-05
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ummmm last i checked they costed more than an SS/SC and I really doubt they are faster in autocrosses, its the driver of the SS/SC sucking if so... Torque is key in acceleration which is what is needed in autocrosses, and the SI DOESNT HAVE IT. As well as the SS's LSD.... i think the SI is around 23,000 i got my ss for 21
Old 05-12-2006, 11:31 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
stg2cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-29-06
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nope

Originally Posted by CobaltBurst
ummmm last i checked they costed more than an SS/SC and I really doubt they are faster in autocrosses, its the driver of the SS/SC sucking if so... Torque is key in acceleration which is what is needed in autocrosses, and the SI DOESNT HAVE IT. As well as the SS's LSD.... i think the SI is around 23,000 i got my ss for 21
We payed for her si 19950 (LSD standard) and i payed 23000 b/c i bought the g85 if you got yours for 21 thats not including the lsd and belive me they are faster in autocrosses b/c i didn't belive but i had two pros driving the cars the si was like 1.5 seconds faster that with ALL SEASON TIRES VERSUS THE PIRELLIS
Old 05-12-2006, 12:02 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OniMirage's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-14-05
Location: Phx, AZ
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
where did you come across this information about the si beating an ss on the turns? a bunch of us ss drivers are about to see the grand am cup race tomorrow and out of alot of much higher quality faster and quicker cars than the si, the ss is currently in first place for the season
Old 05-12-2006, 12:10 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
stg2cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-29-06
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we are comparing stock versus stock and you got to remember the ss has been out for two years and si (06) not even 6 months just wait
but anyway i still like my ss/sc but the si has better quality, i invite you to drive one and you will understand what im taking about


Quick Reply: New Civic SI



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:36 AM.