SS/SC vs. Mustang GT/CS
10-04-2006, 07:45 PM
#28
New Member
Join Date: 10-17-05
Location: Walden Ny
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know different tracks will yield better or worse times.... But , My brother has a stock 05 GTO, and after only three times to the track has a best time of 13.94.
What am i trying to say?....well Chevypowered seems to me that with the mods you have, you should be getting better times. It could be the track, or it could be your driving whos to tell.
What am i trying to say?....well Chevypowered seems to me that with the mods you have, you should be getting better times. It could be the track, or it could be your driving whos to tell.
10-04-2006, 07:53 PM
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-05-05
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Conflykt
I know different tracks will yield better or worse times.... But , My brother has a stock 05 GTO, and after only three times to the track has a best time of 13.94.
What am i trying to say?....well Chevypowered seems to me that with the mods you have, you should be getting better times. It could be the track, or it could be your driving whos to tell.
What am i trying to say?....well Chevypowered seems to me that with the mods you have, you should be getting better times. It could be the track, or it could be your driving whos to tell.
Did your brother run his car in NY? IF so the elevation of that track is at most 2,000'.
10-04-2006, 09:38 PM
#33
New Member
Join Date: 10-17-05
Location: Walden Ny
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chevypowered
I've got a good time for my track, when i raced everyone didn't expect me to get those times. That was with a 7,000' air density and on a track that was not swept or cleaned or preped. I would beat STI's about every other time. I would have had a better 60' with better prep. When i dynoed i had 280 WHP and WTQ, i think that is an exelent time for that amount of HP and Tq in a 3,800 lbs vehicle, don't you think?
Did your brother run his car in NY? IF so the elevation of that track is at most 2,000'.
Did your brother run his car in NY? IF so the elevation of that track is at most 2,000'.
the car is 400 stock at the engine...with the bolt ons you have i would guess it should be at least 425- 450 at the engine......so you're losing anywhere from 220 to 270 hp through the drive train???????
10-04-2006, 09:59 PM
#34
New Member
Join Date: 10-17-05
Location: Walden Ny
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok well i looked up nhra correction tables, and if you are at 7000' (is that what the track you're at is at?) you ran 12.77
The track he ran at is 860'......corrected that is 13.76
so yes that is a good time....of course i looked up the track elevation, not the air density of the day he ran.
The track he ran at is 860'......corrected that is 13.76
so yes that is a good time....of course i looked up the track elevation, not the air density of the day he ran.
10-04-2006, 10:58 PM
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-05-05
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Conflykt
I'm not sure what the elevation is, but wait you only have 28o whp with an 06 goat? with bolt ons
the car is 400 stock at the engine...with the bolt ons you have i would guess it should be at least 425- 450 at the engine......so you're losing anywhere from 220 to 270 hp through the drive train???????
the car is 400 stock at the engine...with the bolt ons you have i would guess it should be at least 425- 450 at the engine......so you're losing anywhere from 220 to 270 hp through the drive train???????
i know it sucks. I couldn't imagine this beast at sea level. 
Originally Posted by Conflykt
ok well i looked up nhra correction tables, and if you are at 7000' (is that what the track you're at is at?) you ran 12.77
The track he ran at is 860'......corrected that is 13.76
so yes that is a good time....of course i looked up the track elevation, not the air density of the day he ran.
The track he ran at is 860'......corrected that is 13.76
so yes that is a good time....of course i looked up the track elevation, not the air density of the day he ran.
10-12-2006, 01:01 AM
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-09-06
Location: PA
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is awesome cuz I'm a ford hater. Specailly Mustangs...I raced one today. Was a new GT. The guy didint even want to give me the time, but finally after lol at me we raced. Was even untill I hit high rpms in second. After that I slowly pulled away and I'm stock. Was fun as hell and he wouldnt even look at me after that. Just a mean, sad puppy dog face that he lost to a 4 banger chevy. I love it!
10-15-2006, 12:12 PM
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: 01-22-06
Location: Canada Oakville Ontario
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by budman128
The GT/CS ( 54C ) package will include - Photos: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4
Larger Air Intake
Custom Intake Engine Cover w/pony emblem
Integrated Chin Spoiler
1.5-inch lower ride height than Mustang GT
Hood Scoop
Side Scoops
GT/CS Decals along the front fender and door
Diffuser Rear Wing
California Special Floor Mats
Bright rolled dual exhaust tips
18-inch polished aluminum 5-spoke wheels (64W)
It has an intake not much faster than any other new style gt but I agree there no slouch
Larger Air Intake
Custom Intake Engine Cover w/pony emblem
Integrated Chin Spoiler
1.5-inch lower ride height than Mustang GT
Hood Scoop
Side Scoops
GT/CS Decals along the front fender and door
Diffuser Rear Wing
California Special Floor Mats
Bright rolled dual exhaust tips
18-inch polished aluminum 5-spoke wheels (64W)
It has an intake not much faster than any other new style gt but I agree there no slouch
10-15-2006, 12:58 PM
#41
Banned
Join Date: 03-14-06
Location: soon to banned as I am from MANITOBA?
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Kahless
gt is a 25k bubble. maybe the cs is 30k but it has no performance enhancements. which only puts it just above the ss.sc. and stock vs modified ='s 
when talking smack of beating them in a more expensive car. but a win is a win. was the car a slush or stick?
when talking smack of beating them in a more expensive car. but a win is a win. was the car a slush or stick?I have seen stock 2005 or so stangs doing 14.2.
Chevypowered I would like to know if your tires are stock. 2.0 60ft is really good.
10-15-2006, 01:28 PM
#42
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 05-03-05
Location: Ar-kan-sas
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ssnipes
I am surprised that a CS stang has no performance enhancements. Are you sure. I saw a girl (who can drive) with a CS and she ran 13.5 all day.
I have seen stock 2005 or so stangs doing 14.2.
Chevypowered I would like to know if your tires are stock. 2.0 60ft is really good.
I have seen stock 2005 or so stangs doing 14.2.
Chevypowered I would like to know if your tires are stock. 2.0 60ft is really good.
10-15-2006, 02:00 PM
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ssnipes
I am surprised that a CS stang has no performance enhancements. Are you sure. I saw a girl (who can drive) with a CS and she ran 13.5 all day.
I have seen stock 2005 or so stangs doing 14.2.
Chevypowered I would like to know if your tires are stock. 2.0 60ft is really good.
I have seen stock 2005 or so stangs doing 14.2.
Chevypowered I would like to know if your tires are stock. 2.0 60ft is really good.
well a bunch of people have run 13.6's in bone stock, stick gt's. I think the cs actually has some suspension mods done, but im not sure.
10-15-2006, 10:37 PM
#44
Banned
Join Date: 03-14-06
Location: soon to banned as I am from MANITOBA?
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro
well a bunch of people have run 13.6's in bone stock, stick gt's. I think the cs actually has some suspension mods done, but im not sure.
Yeah I believe it is possible. I just thought about what could be the difference and then I remembered she has Drag radials.
10-15-2006, 10:55 PM
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-09-06
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ssnipes
Yeah I believe it is possible. I just thought about what could be the difference and then I remembered she has Drag radials.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post