War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

SS/SC vs. SRT-4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2009, 12:29 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-08
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SRTrent
this thread is full of teh funniez. your friend's ported stock turbo skittle should be over 300whp with the mods he has and that tune. he should've pulled on you way harder than 1 1/2 cars. and i call bs on you beating a new SS/TC by 5 cars that's like you saying your as quick as a tuned SS/TC. stock vs stock SS/TC=SRT-4 > SS/SC. i don't wanna hear about the one glory pass about that guy who ran a 13.56. most SS/TC drivers aren't gonna run that and a 13.6 for the skittle well most SRT-4 drivers aren't gonna run that. From a roll Ian's SRT-4 > the Mustang and that's seriously what i think though. just boost the Mustang and it's over.
OMG!!! Get to work, LOL.
Old 05-08-2009, 12:36 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
2006RedCobaltSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-17-07
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SRTrent
this thread is full of teh funniez. your friend's ported stock turbo skittle should be over 300whp with the mods he has and that tune. he should've pulled on you way harder than 1 1/2 cars. and i call bs on you beating a new SS/TC by 5 cars that's like you saying your as quick as a tuned SS/TC. stock vs stock SS/TC=SRT-4 > SS/SC. i don't wanna hear about the one glory pass about that guy who ran a 13.56. most SS/TC drivers aren't gonna run that and a 13.6 for the skittle well most SRT-4 drivers aren't gonna run that. From a roll Ian's SRT-4 > the Mustang and that's seriously what i think though. just boost the Mustang and it's over.
Again, I will let people who saw it step in. My car runs very well. And yes, people also saw the race between the SS/TC and me. I don't make claims if no one else sees it because it would be hard to argue it. If you want, I'll get the SRT4 guy to come on here and tell you what he has and the end result. He was very suprised I was that close to him. My buddy (AjSS) ran him and it was the same result. Aj is a 2.7, meth, Area tuned, ported blower and full bolt-ons and cooling mods. The guy thought he would put buses on me.
Old 05-08-2009, 12:38 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-08
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ajm5036
SS/SC TVS > stock SS/TC > SRT-4 > SS/SC
Tuned SS/TC > TVS SS/SC > stock SS/TC > stock SRT-4 > stock SS/SC



Originally Posted by 2006RedCobaltSS
Again, I will let people who saw it step in. My car runs very well. And yes, people also saw the race between the SS/TC and me. I don't make claims if no one else sees it because it would be hard to argue it. If you want, I'll get the SRT4 guy to come on here and tell you what he has and the end result. He was very suprised I was that close to him. My buddy (AjSS) ran him and it was the same result. Aj is a 2.7, meth, Area tuned, ported blower and full bolt-ons and cooling mods. The guy thought he would put buses on me.
Maybe the guy was lying, or maybe his car was running shitty that day, you never know. But with his said mods, he should have beat you by more.

Last edited by FutureEcotecOwner; 05-08-2009 at 12:38 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 05-08-2009, 01:22 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
2006RedCobaltSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-17-07
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
Tuned SS/TC > TVS SS/SC > stock SS/TC > stock SRT-4 > stock SS/SC





Maybe the guy was lying, or maybe his car was running shitty that day, you never know. But with his said mods, he should have beat you by more.
Well I sent him the link to have him put his input on this. Like said before, his car is pretty quick that's the reason I made this thread. Knew I would lose. But j thougt I would lose
Old 05-08-2009, 01:34 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
G85 SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-25-07
Location: Kissimmee, Fl
Posts: 6,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
Wonder what a TVS guy would say to a 50 trim, or stage 3?? There is a guy here who goes to the local 1/8 mile and he has stage 3 and bolt ons and he runs deep into the 7's in the 1/8 mile.
SRT's get traction though. The Cobalt not so much. I even mentioned that SRT-s with bigger turbos and tuned are beasts....There's a 60trim SRT-4 running around here somewhere. It's a commemorative edition. Only seen it 1 time out on Kirkman in front of Universal and oh-em-gee....
Old 05-08-2009, 01:37 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-08
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by G85 SS
SRT's get traction though. The Cobalt not so much. I even mentioned that SRT-s with bigger turbos and tuned are beasts....There's a 60trim SRT-4 running around here somewhere. It's a commemorative edition. Only seen it 1 time out on Kirkman in front of Universal and oh-em-gee....
Besides the 50 trim, there are quite a few nice turbo upgrades for the SRT-4. My Brother is looking to get a Delta 55 or something like that later this year or next year.
Old 05-08-2009, 01:41 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
restonSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-13-08
Location: up my own ass
Posts: 2,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
theres no way a tuned ss/tc is better than a tvs/sc. no chance in hell
Old 05-08-2009, 01:44 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-08
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by restonSS
theres no way a tuned ss/tc is better than a tvs/sc. no chance in hell
LOL, I dont know much about the TVS S/C, but figured I would post that. What kind of #'s do the TVS S/C's put down? Atleast 300whp correct?
Old 05-08-2009, 01:44 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
~Mike~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-04-08
Location: Wadsworth, OH
Posts: 4,613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by restonSS
theres no way a tuned ss/tc is better than a tvs/sc. no chance in hell
are we talking tune only on the tc? Cuz depending on the tune of the TVS s/c, they're pretty close to equal in power. Guys are getting close to and over 300whp on just a tune on their tc's which is right around the same place a TVS puts you depending on pulley size
Old 05-08-2009, 01:45 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-08
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ~Mike~
are we talking tune only on the tc? Cuz depending on the tune of the TVS s/c, they're pretty close to equal in power. Guys are getting close to and over 300whp on just a tune on their tc's which is right around the same place a TVS puts you depending on pulley size
Ahh so I guess I was right in my last post when I said the TVS S/C puts out about 300whp. Looks like it is pretty close in comparison to a tuned SS/TC.
Old 05-08-2009, 01:47 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
~Mike~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-04-08
Location: Wadsworth, OH
Posts: 4,613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
LOL, I dont know much about the TVS S/C, but figured I would post that. What kind of #'s do the TVS S/C's put down? Atleast 300whp correct?
The TVS can net anywhere from like 300-350 whp on the lsj's. Depending upon pulley size and tune and other mods. So, like I said...depending on how the TVS balt is set up, it'd be fair between a tuned tc and the tvs
Old 05-08-2009, 01:52 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-08
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ~Mike~
The TVS can net anywhere from like 300-350 whp on the lsj's. Depending upon pulley size and tune and other mods. So, like I said...depending on how the TVS balt is set up, it'd be fair between a tuned tc and the tvs
Oh ok. How much does the TVS S/C cost?
Old 05-08-2009, 01:57 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
~Mike~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-04-08
Location: Wadsworth, OH
Posts: 4,613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the TVS is like 1850 or something like that off of OTTP. I do believe they have the lowest price around right now. It's fairly cheap if you compare that to say the Hahn turbo swap kit
Old 05-08-2009, 02:05 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-08
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ~Mike~
the TVS is like 1850 or something like that off of OTTP. I do believe they have the lowest price around right now. It's fairly cheap if you compare that to say the Hahn turbo swap kit
That is pretty damn cheap for an aftermarket S/C, wish the Kenne Bell S/C for my Mustang was that cheap, LOL.
Old 05-08-2009, 02:58 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
~Mike~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-04-08
Location: Wadsworth, OH
Posts: 4,613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I'm not saying the Harrop isn't a good product, but it's not as "sought after" as the Kenne Bell is and the Kenne Bell is a much larger s/c the the Harrop. 1.3L vs 2.1 or higher lol
Old 05-08-2009, 03:02 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-08
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ~Mike~
Well, I'm not saying the Harrop isn't a good product, but it's not as "sought after" as the Kenne Bell is and the Kenne Bell is a much larger s/c the the Harrop. 1.3L vs 2.1 or higher lol
Yeah I know what you mean. But I've been doing some research here lately and I might stay N/A with my GT for now atleast. I can get a cam setup and full exhaust and push right around 350whp N/A.
Old 05-08-2009, 03:06 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
~Mike~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-04-08
Location: Wadsworth, OH
Posts: 4,613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
Yeah I know what you mean. But I've been doing some research here lately and I might stay N/A with my GT for now atleast. I can get a cam setup and full exhaust and push right around 350whp N/A.
Well that's what happens when you have twice the cylinders as we do lol Add the Kenne Bell and buy some diapers, you might need them lol
Old 05-08-2009, 03:11 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
FutureEcotecOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-08
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ~Mike~
Well that's what happens when you have twice the cylinders as we do lol Add the Kenne Bell and buy some diapers, you might need them lol
When I was just checking out some cams, I seen this one guy was pushing 740rwhp in his 3v GT on the stock motor with bolt ons and a S/C. That sounds badass, LOL.
Old 05-08-2009, 08:11 PM
  #44  
Member
 
scottw03's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-07-06
Location: Pikeville, NC
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
SS/TC > SRT-4 > SS/SC

Wait til my Brother sees this, LOL!!! He knows I love him and I'm just messing around!!
I agree, stock vs stock I believe that the SS/TC > SRT-4 > SS/SC

Now modded, it is anyone's game then. It all depends on how much money you are willing to throw at the car and what kind of mods you put on it to maximize performance output.

Originally Posted by G85 SS
SRT's get traction though. The Cobalt not so much. I even mentioned that SRT-s with bigger turbos and tuned are beasts....There's a 60trim SRT-4 running around here somewhere. It's a commemorative edition. Only seen it 1 time out on Kirkman in front of Universal and oh-em-gee....
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH


In what world do you live in?????

With 250 ft/lbs of torque stock and who knows after modded, traction is what owns 90% of SRT-4 owners. Just like everyone else we look for ways to gain it back though. wider stickier tires, traction control systems, EBC's with boost by gear/rpm/mph, etc....

I know with just my stock turbo car at 20 psi I put down 340 ft/lbs of torque and 287 whp with a dump exhaust, wga, intake, S2 computer, S1 injectors, pump gas, boosting 20 psi falling to 15 psi at redline.

With my modified stocker turbo I ran the times in my sig and was probably somewhere around 330 whp and over 340 wtq. Traction is definitely an issue with any high hp/high tq FWD car.

Originally Posted by FutureEcotecOwner
Besides the 50 trim, there are quite a few nice turbo upgrades for the SRT-4. My Brother is looking to get a Delta 55 or something like that later this year or next year.
55lb compressor wheel. Bigger than a 50 trim which will do about 400 whp fairly easily and over 300 without tuning.

Originally Posted by ~Mike~
the TVS is like 1850 or something like that off of OTTP. I do believe they have the lowest price around right now. It's fairly cheap if you compare that to say the Hahn turbo swap kit
So what you are saying is you have to spend $1850 to make roughly the same hp as the SS/TC with just a tune which probably cost less than $500, right?

That IMO make the SS/TC > TVS SS/SC

Last edited by scottw03; 05-08-2009 at 08:11 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 05-08-2009, 08:16 PM
  #45  
The Stig
 
MarcS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-05
Location: New York
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^You can't compare a stock car to a modified one.
Old 05-08-2009, 08:30 PM
  #46  
Member
 
scottw03's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-07-06
Location: Pikeville, NC
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MarcS
^You can't compare a stock car to a modified one.
I am not the one technically comparing stock to modded. Someone else brought up the whole TVS > SS/TC. Plus a tuned SS/TC is not stock. The tune didn't come on your car when you bought it right, hence not stock

I will rephrase the statement for you: Tuned SS/TC > TVS SS/SC

Better?

spending less than $500 (probably) is > spending $1800+ for 300 whp.
Old 05-08-2009, 08:31 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
poppagun's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-13-06
Location: stl
Posts: 2,928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mike who was this
Old 05-08-2009, 08:43 PM
  #48  
The Stig
 
MarcS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-05
Location: New York
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by scottw03
I am not the one technically comparing stock to modded. Someone else brought up the whole TVS > SS/TC. Plus a tuned SS/TC is not stock. The tune didn't come on your car when you bought it right, hence not stock

I will rephrase the statement for you: Tuned SS/TC > TVS SS/SC

Better?

spending less than $500 (probably) is > spending $1800+ for 300 whp.
Thats better
Old 05-08-2009, 08:45 PM
  #49  
Member
 
scottw03's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-07-06
Location: Pikeville, NC
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MarcS
Thats better
LOL, ok man, that was what I was trying to get across, just not clearly the first time.
Old 05-09-2009, 12:43 AM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
1bdstlLSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-14-08
Location: st.louis
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I saw the race 2006 isn't lying at all I know the srt4 owner wes and with a boost leak he made 245whp/300wtq he is making making 280whp without his mopar stage 1pcm...2006 has a freak


Quick Reply: SS/SC vs. SRT-4



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 AM.