War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

Stock 2000 Si vs 2.4SS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2008, 06:21 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
steddy2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-08-06
Location: Newark DE
Posts: 25,530
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
First off...it is a very real possibility that a honda is faster than our cars.

Oh well, get over yourselves.

Seriously, now do I believe that a vtec honda beat a cobalt up top?

Of course I do! That is what those cars are made to do...and jesus ******* ******* bleeding from shitting barbed wire christ will people stop quoting carrol shelby!!!!

Most F1 and champ cars have like 900-1100 HP and like 200 lb-ft of tq.

They are the fastest machines in the world. Tell me how my 45-50 lb-ft of tq won't make most of the cars out on the road look retarded for trying to race me. It isn't all about tq, there is gearing and weight issues too.

That is why 400+hp cars exist that struggle to get into the 12s and yet it is possible for a 300whp (insert generic sport compact car) can run 12s.

People need to shut the hell up and get over the fact that:

1. There are faster cars than Cobalts out there

2. Some of them are Hondas.


/end ******* rant and thread
Old 03-23-2008, 08:26 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
OzzyruleZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-13-07
Location: Keystone Heights, Fl
Posts: 6,664
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by SLoW SHO
I was in my friends bone stock 2000 Civic Si with 150,000 miles on it last night. We were at a light and some cocky ass kid in a 2.4SS was giving us revs through his n1 cannon. So he at least had a muffler on it, probably a few bolt ons, but we'll just say he had a muffler. He was also by himself.

So anyway my friend drives his car pretty well, he launched good but the 2.4SS launched just a little better (amazing this moron could actually drive). They both hit 2nd about the same time with us a half car back. Through second gear we were inching back on him, we both hit 3rd about the same time with the race being nose to nose but the Si was pulling. In 3rd we started leaving him pretty good, by the time we hit 4th ~95mph we were out a solid 2 cars and pulling.

Good times

BTW, this Si is the one with 160hp and nothing for TORQUE. Not that a tq rating means anything at all...
Just found this part here really amusing, especially coming from a V8 owner...

TQ is the actual force the engine exerts so yeah its pretty important. HP is a byproduct of TQ. It is basically the ability to do a said amount of work over time. So basically TQ is the force you feel, HP is how efficiently the force is used.
Old 03-23-2008, 08:40 PM
  #53  
Banned
 
TXRLU's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-30-05
Location: in a house
Posts: 7,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by steddy2112
First off...it is a very real possibility that a honda is faster than our cars.

Oh well, get over yourselves.

Seriously, now do I believe that a vtec honda beat a cobalt up top?

Of course I do! That is what those cars are made to do...and jesus ******* ******* bleeding from shitting barbed wire christ will people stop quoting carrol shelby!!!!

Most F1 and champ cars have like 900-1100 HP and like 200 lb-ft of tq.

They are the fastest machines in the world. Tell me how my 45-50 lb-ft of tq won't make most of the cars out on the road look retarded for trying to race me. It isn't all about tq, there is gearing and weight issues too.

That is why 400+hp cars exist that struggle to get into the 12s and yet it is possible for a 300whp (insert generic sport compact car) can run 12s.

People need to shut the hell up and get over the fact that:

1. There are faster cars than Cobalts out there

2. Some of them are Hondas.


/end ******* rant and thread


PLEASE don't tell me you think torque is insignificant as well.........


Where the **** do some people get their logic? Torque is as "irrelevant" as weight. You can build a race car to suit your needs for ANYTHING out there. Torque is needed to get a car moving period, so to say that it is "irrelevant" is stupid. Yes you can compensate for low torque by gutting a car like those dopey ricer idiots, but that's like grafting on a ball park frank because your 2" just doesn't cut it when it comes to vagina (Oh well, I may have two inches, but I rocked her world). Who cares if you rocked her world, you're still 2"........Get a clue........
Old 03-23-2008, 08:44 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
warrenb213's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-09-07
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I call total bullshit.

Stock 2000 Civic Si runs a 15.6-15.7.

Cobalt LS has even came in with times comparable.

Cobalt 2.4SS IS faster than Stock 2000 SI. End of story.
Old 03-23-2008, 09:48 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
steddy2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-08-06
Location: Newark DE
Posts: 25,530
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by TXRLU
PLEASE don't tell me you think torque is insignificant as well.........


Where the **** do some people get their logic? Torque is as "irrelevant" as weight. You can build a race car to suit your needs for ANYTHING out there. Torque is needed to get a car moving period, so to say that it is "irrelevant" is stupid. Yes you can compensate for low torque by gutting a car like those dopey ricer idiots, but that's like grafting on a ball park frank because your 2" just doesn't cut it when it comes to vagina (Oh well, I may have two inches, but I rocked her world). Who cares if you rocked her world, you're still 2"........Get a clue........
Ok, since I have NO clue at all.

How come sportbikes are faster with less hp and tq?

Power to weight...it is how a Lotus Elise is fast too, but since they are torqueless wonders as well they must be slow.

TDI Jettas are the fastest 4 cyl you can buy. Hands down. They have more torque than most.

******* christ a honda beat a cobalt and everyone is up in arms

People need to learn some new ******* quotes and not care if something beats something. There will always be something faster than you...period...

That is my case I was trying to make. Fuckface up there talking about dicksize lost me about third word into his second sentence.

Get a half a clue, then work slowly to a whole clue and maybe, just maybe you will be able to comprehend what I said in my previous post.

Does it say that tq is insignificant in my first post fuckface?

ZOMG IT DOESN'T. Give yourself a huge ******* star man! Bravo! Seriously I said the world of fast cars does NOT revolve around torque and pointed out that the fastest of fast cars are not torque monsters.

So lessons learned?

******* learn to ******* read before for EPICLY failing to try to bust my *****.

"Well Steve what about the audi race TDIs asstwat?"

Yeah so what, there has been less torque cars since them that have ran faster times. And F1 cars are still faster.

It's ok people, Hondas can be fast to...and why can't people get that maybe the 2.4 driver was a ******* retard too?

Oh no, instead act like the ******* world is coming to a motherfucking end.

Old 03-23-2008, 09:54 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
stage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-28-07
Location: canada
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lsjwannabe
who cares there both slow, **** happens

yes i agreeee
Old 03-23-2008, 10:12 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
Badju587's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-09-07
Location: Severance, CO
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by steddy2112
and jesus ******* ******* bleeding from shitting barbed wire christ will people stop quoting carrol shelby!!!!
Hey Steddy, I share the frustration with people quoting Shelby, especially when they take the statement at face value (BTW... I think he was right, just not for the reasons most people think of, PM me if you're interested).
Old 03-23-2008, 10:21 PM
  #58  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
SLoW SHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-29-06
Location: CT
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by steddy2112
First off...it is a very real possibility that a honda is faster than our cars.

Oh well, get over yourselves.

Seriously, now do I believe that a vtec honda beat a cobalt up top?

Of course I do! That is what those cars are made to do...and jesus ******* ******* bleeding from shitting barbed wire christ will people stop quoting carrol shelby!!!!

Most F1 and champ cars have like 900-1100 HP and like 200 lb-ft of tq.

They are the fastest machines in the world. Tell me how my 45-50 lb-ft of tq won't make most of the cars out on the road look retarded for trying to race me. It isn't all about tq, there is gearing and weight issues too.

That is why 400+hp cars exist that struggle to get into the 12s and yet it is possible for a 300whp (insert generic sport compact car) can run 12s.

People need to shut the hell up and get over the fact that:

1. There are faster cars than Cobalts out there

2. Some of them are Hondas.


/end ******* rant and thread
x2

Originally Posted by OzzyruleZ
Just found this part here really amusing, especially coming from a V8 owner...

TQ is the actual force the engine exerts so yeah its pretty important. HP is a byproduct of TQ. It is basically the ability to do a said amount of work over time. So basically TQ is the force you feel, HP is how efficiently the force is used.
I never said tq was irrelevant, I said the tq rating was. Meaning a Cobalt makes more tq, something like 165 compared to the honda's 110. Those numbers mean nothing to me. What if the honda made its 110tq at 12,000rpm? It'd have 250hp and it would light your **** on fire if you were in the Cobalt that makes its ~165tq around 4500rpm. Torque rating is pointless when your talking about which car is faster. Torque ITSELF is obviously not irrelevant, you need torque to apply force so that you move. People just have no idea what is actually going on, especially when they're like "Well I won off the line because I have more torque" or "I'm faster because I had more torque"

Sorry but it's feasible that a car with 100ft/lbs of tq that weighed 3000lbs could shatter the life of a car that made 400 ft/lbs of tq and weighs 3000lbs.

Originally Posted by Badju587
Hey Steddy, I share the frustration with people quoting Shelby, especially when they take the statement at face value (BTW... I think he was right, just not for the reasons most people think of, PM me if you're interested).
Thank you.
Old 03-23-2008, 10:25 PM
  #59  
Junior Member
 
zsk8er16's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-05-06
Location: Southern IN
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SLoW SHO
S2000 is still pulling hardcore from a roll...
U dont kno what ur talkn about here for sure. One of my good friends with an 04 s2k with the 2.2 l (i think) would lose by several cars from a 40 roll when we were both stock.
Old 03-23-2008, 10:26 PM
  #60  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
SLoW SHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-29-06
Location: CT
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zsk8er16
U dont kno what ur talkn about here for sure. One of my good friends with an 04 s2k with the 2.2 l (i think) would lose by several cars from a 40 roll when we were both stock.
Your good friend happen to be retarded?
Old 03-23-2008, 10:31 PM
  #61  
Junior Member
 
zsk8er16's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-05-06
Location: Southern IN
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SLoW SHO
Your good friend happen to be retarded?
How retarded do u have to b to put the car into 2nd gear and put ur foot on the gas???
Old 03-23-2008, 10:31 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
stage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-28-07
Location: canada
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SLoW SHO - y r u here btw? do u own a cobalt or?

just ban this guy plz
Old 03-23-2008, 11:34 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
steddy2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-08-06
Location: Newark DE
Posts: 25,530
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by zsk8er16
U dont kno what ur talkn about here for sure. One of my good friends with an 04 s2k with the 2.2 l (i think) would lose by several cars from a 40 roll when we were both stock.
Anything can happen on the street.

The S2k is a faster car than the Cobalt
Old 03-23-2008, 11:37 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
2.4SlowassBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-08-07
Location: Lakeland, Florida
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
**** it, everyone in this thread has a slow car...
Old 03-23-2008, 11:38 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
steddy2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-08-06
Location: Newark DE
Posts: 25,530
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Indeed I do...

If you feel that way I don't give a ****...the car isn't my fast
Old 03-24-2008, 12:22 AM
  #66  
Senior Member
 
stage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-28-07
Location: canada
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
imo everything is slow....11 sec or better is somthing somthing fast
Old 03-24-2008, 01:45 AM
  #67  
Junior Member
 
zsk8er16's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-05-06
Location: Southern IN
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by steddy2112
Anything can happen on the street.

The S2k is a faster car than the Cobalt
they have about 195 whp stock and have no torque but weigh 2000 lbs less. Cobalts can have from 205-220 whp stock and way more torque. I beat him everytime from a roll but he would smoke me from a dig.
Old 03-24-2008, 01:47 AM
  #68  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
lsjwannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-06
Location: on here
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2.4SlowassBalt
**** it, everyone in this thread has a slow car...
i do
Old 03-24-2008, 01:50 AM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
CinciSS07's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-09-07
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SLoW SHO
This car has ran 15.3 @ 89 bone stock thats just what they do, sorry the SS/NA is slower than a 2000 Si, saw it with my own eyes. The 06-08 Si is more of a mid-high 14 second car with traps easilly over 95mph.
just because you saw ONE race happen like that doesn't mean you can assume this outcome would happen in EVERY situation like that.
Old 03-24-2008, 01:54 AM
  #70  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
steddy2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-08-06
Location: Newark DE
Posts: 25,530
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by zsk8er16
they have about 195 whp stock and have no torque but weigh 2000 lbs less. Cobalts can have from 205-220 whp stock and way more torque. I beat him everytime from a roll but he would smoke me from a dig.
A lighter car that lives in the upper RPM...you are faster from a roll...to a point...then stock for stock he will pull you...it is what honda is known for

And from a dig all the way up to top speed I bet the S2k is faster than the cobalt
Old 03-24-2008, 01:56 AM
  #71  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
lsjwannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-06
Location: on here
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why are we arguing agian?
Old 03-24-2008, 01:59 AM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
Projekt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-03-07
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 24,280
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by lsjwannabe
why are we arguing agian?
cuz steedy is online
Old 03-24-2008, 02:00 AM
  #73  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
lsjwannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-06
Location: on here
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it's all becoming clear now
Old 03-24-2008, 02:02 AM
  #74  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
steddy2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-08-06
Location: Newark DE
Posts: 25,530
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Hey, I can't help these poor misinformed souls.

Old 03-24-2008, 02:03 AM
  #75  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
lsjwannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-06
Location: on here
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sometimes you just have to let them find out the hard way


Quick Reply: Stock 2000 Si vs 2.4SS



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 AM.