MillerCycle

I was at the movies and didn't have time to even look at this thread till just now, so I decided to answer all the questions. Since you know I'm stock and I proved you wrong... You call me a troll.

cranemaster

You haven't proved anything nor have I clicked on any videos or read anything on this thread.

Youre a Honda ricer with a slow family car, who argues on the Internet about other shitty slow family cars. Grats.

MillerCycle

Thanks for your ignorant contribution to the thread.

FasterIsBetter

**** is slow. Thanks for the mediocre contribution and attempt at bashing a fwd car forum. I have seen stock LSJ Cobalts beat on G35s all day...but hey its just a econobox pos that cost half of what your car does. Good times I guess? See the funny thing is we don't bash on an actually fast car but **** is slow. Hop on back to the G forums with your Bolton g35. We'll stick with our bolt on cobalts that are running mid to low 12s all day, a couple in 11s. Oh and did I mention they still cost half as much?

MillerCycle

Hahahaha... It's funny you guys think I am hiding something or have some secret mod! Did you see my bolt ons on the last page ? I made a walk around to highlight them for ya

Yeah it's slow, it's stock L99 Camaro SS slow. As proven in recorded evidence time and time over. Weather/DA/track prep was great for both of us!

MillerCycle

He's a friend of mine... He used to own a WRX. But he sold it. If you go over past posts you will see his SRT8 and vids of it racing a T/C CSS.

MillerCycle

Is that Protuned or running base OTS maps ?

714ionredline

iTrader: (1)

@miller- so did you sell your accord?? And how the hell did motorweek only do a 14.2 on a stock g35 and your were able to do a 13.6 all stock? Btw nice upgrade...

CordiaDOHC

iTrader: (2)

Don't get too excited Jr. Your buddy either needs to fix something or needs to learn how to drive his car. Hell my eclipse only lost by 1 car length to a 99 cobra. Sure as hell doesn't mean my eclipse runs 13's or that its fast. Just means the guy couldn't drive or his car was sick. And showing shots of the car doesn't mean anything. Doesn't mean you couldn't of found a higher rpm factory torque converter. Or put in numerically higher gears in back. Or ported the intake and heads. Deleted the air silencer/resonator. Etc Etc. All of that would make it run stronger yet look stock. Fact of the matter is these cars don't compete head to head and in a true heads up with even drivers the camaro is trapping a minimum of 5mph faster. And dollar for dollar the camaro will pick up more power. Now put this all aside and this is a Chevy forum not a Nissan forum for a retired grandpa golfers car.

1BADSS/SC

The ss runs low 13's high 12's stock. The camaro needs a driver mod and the g35 is probly tuned at the least. Stock for stock the ss is faster. Mod for mod the ss is faster.

This was a good drivers race though for the most part.

muskegoil

Hes a real tool. He says his friend bolted tuned 5.0 with drag radial traps 108. Lmao. You guys know how a new tuned 5.0 with tires runs and it ain't even close to that. He's not stock,,,,but whats up with all those shitty drivers at his track. His other buddy runs 13.5 at 106 with a cai and tune charger srt. He must be the only good driver in his world.

VR09Sedan

I could see that happening in ideal weather conditions. The 3.7 Stang ( I have) with 2.73 Grandma gears were tested as a low 14 second car when there have been a few to get 13.7-13.8. Track pack are mid 13 second cars with the 3.31s. The 3.7 is about the same wieght as the G35 Sedan at 3500lbs making around 250-260WHP. Same weight, same power auto transmission, very close trap speeds, it could happen.

The new WRX's are pretty quick. Downside is you have to absolutely abuse it off the line to get those great times. (High RPM, clutch murdering launches) But hey, that's why most of the owners bought em

OzzyruleZ

Well according to the thread at Camaro5 it really wasn't that great of weather. That was my first thought. However a DA of 500ft isn't really great. My best pass in my 350Z, which is stock, was on a day the DA was -220 DA which is GREAT conditions. The atmosphere was as dense as being 220 feet below sea level.

My car put down 265whp. My pass had a better 60' than this guy. If he cut a 60' identical to mine he would have ran a time close to or faster than mine. In conditions that are the equivalent to 700ft of higher elevation, which means less oxygen, in a car that has the same amount of power, that weighs 200lbs more.

You're car is either a factory freak or something is done to it. The math doesn't add up. I own a stock VQHR in a lighter car. I know what they run. You can walk around the car all day long. A tune and gears aren't something you can see.

1BADSS/SC

G35's are slow anyway who really cares? Theyre heavy underpowered luxury cars. Big deal.

Even the fast luxury cars are overpriced for their performance.

04silverwrx

I would expect more from a fellow SRT owner. your an idiot Musk. The 5.o stang has a muffler delete and thats all. He did trap 108 and that is very much possible in a new 5.0 mustang. He has trapped 110-111 in a track in Mississippi. He showed me the slip. The DA that night was good for OKLAHOMA. This isnt Houston we dont get negative DA's here. The car is stock face it. Another guy has gone 13.5 in his G35 sedan. Are you gonna call BS on him too? Last year my car went 13.2@108 on motor at the same track millercylce ran at. It has an intake, programmer and gutted cats. It has also gone 12.344 @ 115 and has trapped 118. Ya its slow thats why im getting a 2011-2012 mustang 5.0. Its a nice car but much easier to go fast in a car that doesnt weigh 4300 LBS. Also my SRT has 75k miles so its time for something new. A whole lot of e-thuggin and bench racing going on in this thread. It is what it is get over it

muskegoil

You guys kill me lol. First miller says tuned and drag radial on the 5.0. Now you say muffler delete. Whos right ..youre saying youre srt went 12.34 at 115 and trapped as high as 118. But you were going thumbs up on a 13.5 106 run. At the same track as miller with his (stock) lol g35 hero run. So miller should be pulling low 13 at a better track then lmao. Wtv you guys are tools.

muskegoil

Those 5.0 trap more than 108 stock. And dont blame the track. If miller can fly down the track lol at 13.6 at 102. The 5.0 should be 110 and over trap. Especially with drag radials.

Vander Nars

iTrader: (5)

Another miller thread that has gone to ****, i dont think miller has ever made a thread without pissing off half the forum. lol

Viceversa10

new Cobe?

1BADSS/SC

17 posts? Me thinks i smell a spam troll...

CordiaDOHC

iTrader: (2)

In the end its a G35. Go to starbucks get a coffee then go home and see if your latest version of Golf digest has come in.

muskegoil

I think youre right,hes supposely miller buddy lol but they tell different stories lol. I give up you guys deal with him.

FasterIsBetter

^^This!

When a respected and seasoned 350Z owner chimes in and says its even near impossible in a stock 350Z let alone a stock G35 something is wrong with this picture and I'm guessing it was probably a track fluke with their sensors and a horrible driver in the Camaro because a stock G35 sedan just won't run that time as well as being through the auto, prob is making less than 265whp.

MillerCycle

Here's a stock G35 auto sedan. Same color, same trans, everything. Ran the same trap and ET as me. It's normally a 13.7-13.8 car, so to hit 13.5-13.6 isn't unreasonable. I don't understand why it's so inconceivable that it could happen.


I don't have 4.08 gears, 2nd goes to 65 and 3rd goes to 105(if manually shifted before redline). If I had a tune it would trap more then 102... That's what it's rated stock.

MillerCycle

Hey... I never said tune for the 5.0. Yes it is on Nitto Drag radials, DR's don't add mph to the trap. I said I/e.... which is cai and muffler delete for the 5.0.

His SRT8 has gone 12.3 at 115-118 mph, but on wet 100 shot of nitrous.

13.5 @ 106 run was all motor in 2500+ DA. He didn't run his SRT8 when I ran my G35.