Turbo'ed Firebird vs Cobalt SS/TC
#1
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 07-19-08
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turbo'ed Firebird vs Cobalt SS/TC
Ok So the Details
1998 Pontiac Firebird 3.8L V6 5spd Auto
t70 turbo running only 9psi
gtp manifolds, custom catless exhaust
ws9 ram air intake setup
stock internals, stock fuel pump/injectors
mild 91 octane tune
fairly new Nitto DR's
2008 Cobalt SS/TC
Custom Tune
Charge Piping
K/N Filter
Lowered on Sportlines
So my friends almost done with his turbo v6 build and he should be dynoing around 320rwhp if they ever get the tune right. We met a guy the other night in a parking lot with a new cobalt ss/tc who claimed to dyno around 290 whp. They are going to race sometime this month, one from a dig, just for ***** and giggles, and then a couple from a 40 and 50 roll. Inputs? Any and all input is welcome, thanks for reading.
guess no one gives a ****. /bump
1998 Pontiac Firebird 3.8L V6 5spd Auto
t70 turbo running only 9psi
gtp manifolds, custom catless exhaust
ws9 ram air intake setup
stock internals, stock fuel pump/injectors
mild 91 octane tune
fairly new Nitto DR's
2008 Cobalt SS/TC
Custom Tune
Charge Piping
K/N Filter
Lowered on Sportlines
So my friends almost done with his turbo v6 build and he should be dynoing around 320rwhp if they ever get the tune right. We met a guy the other night in a parking lot with a new cobalt ss/tc who claimed to dyno around 290 whp. They are going to race sometime this month, one from a dig, just for ***** and giggles, and then a couple from a 40 and 50 roll. Inputs? Any and all input is welcome, thanks for reading.
guess no one gives a ****. /bump
Last edited by TurbochargedFuture88; 12-01-2008 at 10:16 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-15-08
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#8
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 07-19-08
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My friend's firebird just got off the dyno this morning. A little better than we had hoped for, got the tune down and final numbers were around 330rwhp 345 lb/ft @ 8 PSI. Should put him in the mid/high 12's, maybe lower mid 12's since hes running DR's now.
#9
Senior Member
those firebirds way more than rosie odonald in Rosannne... the t/c well pwn him esspically with that anti-boost shift thing they have... because that firebird which is auto will not have boost lag either between gears... and neither should the t/c however for some reason a stick is just always quicker than an auto on a roll... remember i said roll. not at the track.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-05-08
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After owning 2 LS1 Camaros and now my 350whp C6 I doubt your friend will be running low 12's. Also did he make sure he is using the one piece DS and did he replace the stock open differential or was it a Y87?
When you make comments like this don't ask why people gang up on you for arogance in other threads.
Last edited by LS2guy; 12-03-2008 at 09:54 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-13-08
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-06-05
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
eh, I'm not hating cause it's a 3600lb firebird, I'm hating cause it's a v6 and it sounds like a really cheap build and 330/345 definitely isn't enough to beat a cobalt putting out 290ish/310+tq. He is on stock bottom end, stock pump, stock injectors (stock fuel supply is enough for me to know bad things couuld happen at his power level), and also he is probably on stock trans, stock rear end (open diff). This is not a thoroughly thought out build. This is a very cheap build. He isn't putting that power to the ground effeciently, and that's not even a lot of power for his vehicle's weight. And at the same time, it's too much power for that stock fuel system.
Cobalt wins.
Cobalt wins.
#16
Senior Member
sorry guys the balt is going to win... i'm sticking with that. personally those 3.8 motors in those v6 firebirds are just weak. couldnt even spin wheels in the snow(figuretivly speaking). for real my old 2001 COUGAR duratec OWNNNNNNED my good friend chris's 01 or w.e v6 firebird and he had i/h/e. chip, timing advanced etc... and oh my cougar was hmm sri and cat-back. Nothing else... how does a cougar 165 or so at the wheels pwn the HELLLL i mean pwn the hell out of a firebird like that. and yes his was an automatic. no driver mod needed and the kid could drive my car just as good as me. see the comparison i'm trying to make? i think his firebird was putting out 235-240 with the tune. it was a coupe also. and remember my cougar 165 or so at the wheels... those v6 firebirds are junk. the v6's i never said NOTHING bout those bad ass formula's or WS6's. god i would die for a WS6
just wanted to add or correct one more thing when i say putting out i mean hp not tq... tq i couldnt tell you. but he never stood a chance against my duratec and adding a 8psi untuned turbo probably would of made him WALK away from me not own me... and my cougar could never EVER keep up with a ss/sc let alone a sweet ss/tc
just wanted to add or correct one more thing when i say putting out i mean hp not tq... tq i couldnt tell you. but he never stood a chance against my duratec and adding a 8psi untuned turbo probably would of made him WALK away from me not own me... and my cougar could never EVER keep up with a ss/sc let alone a sweet ss/tc
Last edited by 06SS ALL DAY; 12-03-2008 at 10:54 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#17
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
what makes you think the firebird weighs soo much. just looked it up they are about 3300 pounds with the auto. i bet its only about a 300 pound difference at most. and with enough traction why couldnt it be in the 12's. stock ls1 cars are in 12's all the time and this is putting down the same power with a bit less weight from them.
i say its close but the bird will take it until its speed limiter at 118 hahahaha
i say its close but the bird will take it until its speed limiter at 118 hahahaha
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-06-05
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
what makes you think the firebird weighs soo much. just looked it up they are about 3300 pounds with the auto. i bet its only about a 300 pound difference at most. and with enough traction why couldnt it be in the 12's. stock ls1 cars are in 12's all the time and this is putting down the same power with a bit less weight from them.
i say its close but the bird will take it until its speed limiter at 118 hahahaha
i say its close but the bird will take it until its speed limiter at 118 hahahaha
#19
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
the stock tranny is very strong. i never had aproblem with mine and i beat it, well i beat it severly. has it been confirmed that he has the open diff, they did come with optional posi, y87 i think was the package with dual exhaust and all that. and he has dr's to help out.
im gonna give him the benefit of the doubt, those 3.8s arent as bad as everyone thinks they are. and the ls1's with the same hp and tq but 100lbs heavier run 12's. im just saying it could happen. but we wont know until they come back with some time slips
im gonna give him the benefit of the doubt, those 3.8s arent as bad as everyone thinks they are. and the ls1's with the same hp and tq but 100lbs heavier run 12's. im just saying it could happen. but we wont know until they come back with some time slips
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-26-06
Location: Marlton, NJ
Posts: 9,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 3.8 is a pretty stout motor and I wouldn't count out the Firebird, ESPECIALLY since he's RWD. From a dig, I think the Firebird is going to put some space on the Cobalt, from a roll the Cobalt may take him because of the weight difference. Also going to depend on how the turbo spooling differs on the two vehicles, the speeds they roll from, and the tuning.
FWD is MUCH more difficult to launch with, so even with the weight difference, I think the RWD has an advantage.
FWD is MUCH more difficult to launch with, so even with the weight difference, I think the RWD has an advantage.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-05-08
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sorry guys the balt is going to win... i'm sticking with that. personally those 3.8 motors in those v6 firebirds are just weak. couldnt even spin wheels in the snow(figuretivly speaking). for real my old 2001 COUGAR duratec OWNNNNNNED my good friend chris's 01 or w.e v6 firebird and he had i/h/e. chip, timing advanced etc... and oh my cougar was hmm sri and cat-back. Nothing else... how does a cougar 165 or so at the wheels pwn the HELLLL i mean pwn the hell out of a firebird like that. and yes his was an automatic. no driver mod needed and the kid could drive my car just as good as me. see the comparison i'm trying to make? i think his firebird was putting out 235-240 with the tune. it was a coupe also. and remember my cougar 165 or so at the wheels... those v6 firebirds are junk. the v6's i never said NOTHING bout those bad ass formula's or WS6's. god i would die for a WS6
just wanted to add or correct one more thing when i say putting out i mean hp not tq... tq i couldnt tell you. but he never stood a chance against my duratec and adding a 8psi untuned turbo probably would of made him WALK away from me not own me... and my cougar could never EVER keep up with a ss/sc let alone a sweet ss/tc
just wanted to add or correct one more thing when i say putting out i mean hp not tq... tq i couldnt tell you. but he never stood a chance against my duratec and adding a 8psi untuned turbo probably would of made him WALK away from me not own me... and my cougar could never EVER keep up with a ss/sc let alone a sweet ss/tc
There is no way in hell your friend had a 3800 maybe a 3400 but not a 3800. I could kill Duratec V-6 Cougars in my POS daily driven 1993 Cavalier Z24 A3. My Cavalier ran a best time of 16.0 in the 1/4 mile. I then bought a 2001 Z24 M5 as a daily driver and when I raced KlugSRT-4's 2001 Firebird V6 it was a dead even race until speed limiters.
A decent 3800 with Y87 will average low 15's 100% bone stock your Cougar on the other hand might run high 16's.
#24
Senior Member
There is no way in hell your friend had a 3800 maybe a 3400 but not a 3800. I could kill Duratec V-6 Cougars in my POS daily driven 1993 Cavalier Z24 A3. My Cavalier ran a best time of 16.0 in the 1/4 mile. I then bought a 2001 Z24 M5 as a daily driver and when I raced KlugSRT-4's 2001 Firebird V6 it was a dead even race until speed limiters.
A decent 3800 with Y87 will average low 15's 100% bone stock your Cougar on the other hand might run high 16's.
A decent 3800 with Y87 will average low 15's 100% bone stock your Cougar on the other hand might run high 16's.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-26-06
Location: Marlton, NJ
Posts: 9,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is no way in hell your friend had a 3800 maybe a 3400 but not a 3800. I could kill Duratec V-6 Cougars in my POS daily driven 1993 Cavalier Z24 A3. My Cavalier ran a best time of 16.0 in the 1/4 mile. I then bought a 2001 Z24 M5 as a daily driver and when I raced KlugSRT-4's 2001 Firebird V6 it was a dead even race until speed limiters.
A decent 3800 with Y87 will average low 15's 100% bone stock your Cougar on the other hand might run high 16's.
A decent 3800 with Y87 will average low 15's 100% bone stock your Cougar on the other hand might run high 16's.
Anyways...I think the RWD will come into play as far as running from a dig. Running from a roll could be anyones race, but I may have to lean towards the Cobey for that win..