War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

wooow!!! My cobalt beat the M6!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-2009, 08:01 PM
  #76  
Senior Member
 
Jackalope's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-12-06
Location: here
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC
This is the type of fainboi I was referring to in the other thread....

where do these people come from?
The dark side of the moon. Whats worse is people ACTUALY believe him.
Old 06-08-2009, 08:09 PM
  #77  
Senior Member
 
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jackalope
The dark side of the moon. Whats worse is people ACTUALY believe him.
I dont understand. I feel like pulling my hair out from the stupidity of some people on here....
Old 06-08-2009, 08:12 PM
  #78  
Senior Member
 
Jackalope's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-12-06
Location: here
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC
I dont understand. I feel like pulling my hair out from the stupidity of some people on here....
Like I said before tho YES a Cobalt could beat an M6 but I think you'd need a few more mods. And then which car wuld you really rather have? or which one has a higher "ASS FACTOR" meaning which car will get you more ass.
Old 06-08-2009, 08:15 PM
  #79  
Senior Member
 
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jackalope
Like I said before tho YES a Cobalt could beat an M6 but I think you'd need a few more mods. And then which car wuld you really rather have? or which one has a higher "ASS FACTOR" meaning which car will get you more ass.
and LNF would only take one with a ******* turbo upgrade. No bolt on LNF is going to take one. No way in hell that turbo is going to net a 121 mph trap. Thats rediculous power netting that high of a trap stock.

no "STOCK WITH TUNE ONLY!" nuthugger lnf is going to win from a roll or a dig. There is no way. A turbo upgraded LSJ, yes. A turbo upgraded LNF, I would think so. A stock turbo LNF, no ******* way.

why am I telling u this? U already know this
Old 06-08-2009, 08:22 PM
  #80  
Senior Member
 
Deathscythe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-28-06
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so do you think a 330 whp equipped lsj can't hang with or beat a challenger srt8?
Old 06-08-2009, 08:24 PM
  #81  
Senior Member
 
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Deathscythe
so do you think a 330 whp equipped lsj can't hang with or beat a challenger srt8?
the lsj should crush it? why?
Old 06-08-2009, 08:27 PM
  #82  
Senior Member
 
Deathscythe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-28-06
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what's the weight difference between that and an m6?
Old 06-08-2009, 08:34 PM
  #83  
Senior Member
 
Jackalope's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-12-06
Location: here
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The SRT8 what? Cause some of them are over 4000 pounds. And they have only what 425hp? The M6 wieghs less and has 500 hp.

Hell I can compete with the SRT8 cars but I know I'll get my ass handed to me by an M6!
Old 06-08-2009, 08:36 PM
  #84  
Senior Member
 
Deathscythe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-28-06
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
even in it's normal state? If you have a gt then yeah, but a gxp would be able to handle the p400 for the most part.
Old 06-08-2009, 08:40 PM
  #85  
Senior Member
 
Jackalope's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-12-06
Location: here
Posts: 12,764
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Deathscythe
even in it's normal state? If you have a gt then yeah, but a gxp would be able to handle the p400 for the most part.
The GXP is a high 12 car stock. My GT is a low 13 car stock. Even in its p400 state it still has 400hp vs my 370hp and it weighs less. My car crushes the scales at 4050!

But gimme a 5 series and I'll **** him up! Been there and done that! NO not an M5 just a 5 series.
Old 06-08-2009, 08:49 PM
  #86  
Senior Member
 
Deathscythe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-28-06
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so you are at a slight disadvantage. He doesn't have the power exactly, but has half a ton less the weight you do.
Old 06-08-2009, 09:27 PM
  #87  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
06G85's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-19-09
Location: Severn, Maryland
Posts: 4,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mkriebs
I'm taking this as a joke.
You're right lol ..this guy is nuts.
Old 06-08-2009, 09:28 PM
  #88  
Senior Member
 
Nismothecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-21-08
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 3,186
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i believe it. i was behind an M5 a few months ago at a light we both pulled away fast and gunned it(i know he did cuz i could see the car squat and a tiny puff of smoke out of the exhaust). he pulled a car and a half on me and stayed that way till 110. then we hit a light. i would have tried again but he made a left at the last second. i have an MS3 with just an intake.

so a tuned SS could probably do that. ive also heard that there is a button you can press on those cars that gives it full power. i heard its 400hp normally and if you hit the performance button you get 500hp. but thats just something i heard or read. not sure if its true. if its true and if they only had 400hp then i could see it being very true.
Old 06-08-2009, 09:38 PM
  #89  
Senior Member
 
Deathscythe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-28-06
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it is true, and that's the reason why this is possible. Some don't want to believe, but like I keep saying, numbers don't lie.
Old 06-08-2009, 10:09 PM
  #90  
Banned
 
SLoW SHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-29-06
Location: CT
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jackalope
The GXP is a high 12 car stock. My GT is a low 13 car stock. Even in its p400 state it still has 400hp vs my 370hp and it weighs less. My car crushes the scales at 4050!

But gimme a 5 series and I'll **** him up! Been there and done that! NO not an M5 just a 5 series.
Idk about that... On the G8 boards people go nuts if they run 13.4's
Old 06-08-2009, 10:49 PM
  #91  
Senior Member
 
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Deathscythe
it is true, and that's the reason why this is possible. Some don't want to believe, but like I keep saying, numbers don't lie.
power/weight ratio doesnt take into account gearing. Power/weight ratio doesnt atke into account other factors either, thats why its a POOR basis for comparison.

For example, lets take a 300 whp LSJ vs a 300 whp LNF. In theory, they should be almost equal in speed. HOWEVER we all know the LSJ will smoke the LNF at the same power level.

This is just one example of why power/weight ratio are extremely poor basises for comparison. A tuned fully bolted LNF can run high 12's @ ~113 mph. A stock M6 can run mid to low 12's at 120+ mph. The trap and the times just show even a fully bolted LNF will NOT beat a stock M6 from a dig or a roll. Its not happening.

the quarter mile times show how much power a car is really making, and how well it launches. Even with a shitty launch, the trap still shows how much power the car is making when traction comes.
Old 06-08-2009, 11:35 PM
  #92  
Senior Member
 
Deathscythe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-28-06
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you make it sound like gearing is going to make up for an 1100 lb difference in weight when the power to the ground from both vehicles is similar. Between these two vehicles your comparison doesn't make any sense. Gearing has almost nothing to do with this because of the vast differences between the two. The only real comparisons that can be made with this matchup is power output and curb weight which I did. Don't get me wrong, I understand you fully, but that doesn't apply here. What you referred to is a match where all variables are equal. This one the op stated obviously isn't.

Everyone is hung up on the fact that he ran in m mode when the op doesn't even know. The only way this makes sense is that he didn't. And if he didn't, that m6 wouldn't be running 12's in the 1/4 and trapping so high, since the normal setting is 105 hp less. That's all there is to it.
Old 06-09-2009, 01:17 AM
  #93  
Senior Member
 
04YellowGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-30-06
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Deathscythe
you make it sound like gearing is going to make up for an 1100 lb difference in weight when the power to the ground from both vehicles is similar. Between these two vehicles your comparison doesn't make any sense. Gearing has almost nothing to do with this because of the vast differences between the two. The only real comparisons that can be made with this matchup is power output and curb weight which I did. Don't get me wrong, I understand you fully, but that doesn't apply here. What you referred to is a match where all variables are equal. This one the op stated obviously isn't.

Everyone is hung up on the fact that he ran in m mode when the op doesn't even know. The only way this makes sense is that he didn't. And if he didn't, that m6 wouldn't be running 12's in the 1/4 and trapping so high, since the normal setting is 105 hp less. That's all there is to it.
The hp/lb factor is a bunch of ****. At the end of the day a 500hp car is going to move out especially from a roll . The biggest thing your forgetting is that after a object is moving weight plays less of a factor.

The Cobalt SS weighs 2975 and a GT500 weighs 3950.

Even if he is making 300fwhp he still isn't hanging with a Shelby so whats your excues for that?
Old 06-09-2009, 01:26 AM
  #94  
Senior Member
 
ralliartist's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-06-05
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
this thread is hilarious. I saw a thread just like this on fbodyeurope the other day. A guy with a c6 z06 with a few bolt ons ended up running a stock m6 on the autobahn. He said the m6 stayed just a few cars back all the way up to 160 from about a 80mph roll.

Only difference, his was believable.
Old 06-09-2009, 01:51 AM
  #95  
Senior Member
 
2MCHBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-27-09
Location: Climbin In Your Window...
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC
This is just one example of why power/weight ratio are extremely poor basises for comparison. A tuned fully bolted LNF can run high 12's @ ~113 mph.
What owners on this forum have ran those times?
Old 06-09-2009, 09:13 AM
  #96  
Senior Member
 
Deathscythe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-28-06
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 04YellowGT
The hp/lb factor is a bunch of ****. At the end of the day a 500hp car is going to move out especially from a roll . The biggest thing your forgetting is that after a object is moving weight plays less of a factor.

The Cobalt SS weighs 2975 and a GT500 weighs 3950.

Even if he is making 300fwhp he still isn't hanging with a Shelby so whats your excues for that?
And once again, you're another person that doesn't bother to read what you quote. I'm not talking about him beating a 500 hp car, I'm talking about a 395hp car getting beat by a 300whp car that weighs a half-ton less.

Since we're talking about 500hp cars, riddle me this one. Why is the 505hp z06 just as fast to 60 and in the 1/4 mile as the srt-10? The srt-10 has 600hp, so why are they so close? There's a 250 lb difference between the two, with the viper being the heavier of the two. And why is the gt500 1/4 mile time a whole second slower than both even though the gearing is shorter to help with acceleration? It weighs 550lb more than the viper does and 800lb more than a z06.

Don't try to convince me that weight doesn't matter.
Old 06-09-2009, 09:36 AM
  #97  
Senior Member
 
MaxVQ35DE's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-17-08
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATTENTION:

Put your sport compact crackpipes down, I dont want to hear any more "I beat a supercar in my 13 second FWD car"

I dont want to hear about partial throttle C6's, V8 m3's, V10 M5s and M6's, Gallardos, Ultimas, Skylines, terminator cobras, GT500s chipped 335is i just dont want to hear it.... ITS BULLSHIT
Old 06-09-2009, 10:07 AM
  #98  
Senior Member
 
Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-22-08
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 2MCHBoost
What owners on this forum have ran those times?
revhigh18 went 12.750 @ 113mph with a tune and light bolt-ons on street tires in his LNF.
Old 06-09-2009, 10:10 AM
  #99  
Senior Member
 
LittleMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-06
Location: HepCat City
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Force
revhigh18 went 12.750 @ 113mph with a tune and light bolt-ons on street tires in his LNF.
really? that is a sweet time/trap...
Old 06-09-2009, 10:45 AM
  #100  
Member
 
Sarvoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-25-08
Location: The Moon
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MaxVQ35DE
ATTENTION:

Put your sport compact crackpipes down, I dont want to hear any more "I beat a supercar in my 13 second FWD car"

I dont want to hear about partial throttle C6's, V8 m3's, V10 M5s and M6's, Gallardos, Ultimas, Skylines, terminator cobras, GT500s chipped 335is i just dont want to hear it.... ITS BULLSHIT

Wait..

Terminators and GT500s aren't supercars.

That's all.


Quick Reply: wooow!!! My cobalt beat the M6!!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 AM.